Open Access

Portrait of inflammatory response to ionizing radiation treatment

  • Federica Maria Di Maggio1, 2,
  • Luigi Minafra2,
  • Giusi Irma Forte2,
  • Francesco Paolo Cammarata2,
  • Domenico Lio1,
  • Cristina Messa2, 3, 4,
  • Maria Carla Gilardi2, 3, 5 and
  • Valentina Bravatà2Email author
Journal of Inflammation201512:14

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12950-015-0058-3

Received: 25 August 2014

Accepted: 29 January 2015

Published: 18 February 2015

Abstract

Ionizing radiation (IR) activates both pro-and anti-proliferative signal pathways producing an imbalance in cell fate decision. IR is able to regulate several genes and factors involved in cell-cycle progression, survival and/or cell death, DNA repair and inflammation modulating an intracellular radiation-dependent response. Radiation therapy can modulate anti-tumour immune responses, modifying tumour and its microenvironment. In this review, we report how IR could stimulate inflammatory factors to affect cell fate via multiple pathways, describing their roles on gene expression regulation, fibrosis and invasive processes. Understanding the complex relationship between IR, inflammation and immune responses in cancer, opens up new avenues for radiation research and therapy in order to optimize and personalize radiation therapy treatment for each patient.

Keywords

Ionizing radiationInflammationCytokineFibrosisInvasiveness

Introduction

Radiation therapy (RT) is a treatment modality used for many types of cancer: more than 50% of cancer patients receive RT, often used in combination with surgery and chemotherapy [1].

Ionizing radiation (IR) activate both pro- and anti-proliferative signal pathways altering the homeostatic balance between survival and cell death, regulated by several genes and factors involved in cell cycle progression, DNA repair, inflammation and cell death induction [2].

Studies have shown that RT may reduce the incidence of distant metastases and improve survival by controlling locoregional recurrence [3].

An increasing amount of data suggests that there is a direct relationship by which radiation stimulate the immune system, which in turn contributes to tumour cell death [4].

It has long been recognized that the immune system plays a pivotal role in tumours. On the one hand, immunological factors can suppress tumour development by killing cancer cells or inhibiting their growth. On the other hand, immune cells are able to induce an immunosuppressive microenvironment that contributes to promote tumour progression [5-7].

More precisely, inflammatory cytokines, growth factors and proteases can affect cancer cell invasion, bystander effect, radiation tissue complications such as fibrosis, genomic instability and thus can greatly affect intrinsic cellular radiosensitivity [8-10].

Recently, it has become evident that, in particular for solid tumours, the inhibition of neoplastic cell proliferative capacity following irradiation can occur through different modes of cell death that could also be induced by immunological factors (i.e. apoptosis, necrosis, mitotic catastrophe, autophagy and senescence) [2].

The aim of this review is to describe how IR may stimulate immunological factors to determine cell fate by multiple pathways by providing an overview of the main key transcription factors that modulate inflammatory gene expression profile after IR exposure. We shall also discuss the cytokine pivotal role in invasiveness and radiation-related fibrosis, and combined radio-immune cancer therapies. Finally, we introduce the future perspectives of a IORT inflammatory response evaluation in understanding inflammatory response induced by a high dose of radiation, in order to identify potential biomarkers that may have a prognostic value for cancer treatment.

Signalling events in tumour activated by ionizing radiation

In mammalian cells, IR can elicit a multi-layered signalling response by activating many pro-survival pathways that converge to transiently activate key transcription factors (TFs). These include the Nuclear Factor kappa B (NF-kB) and signal transducers and activators of transcription members (STATs) [11,12]. Together, these TFs regulate a wide spectrum of genes involved in inflammation, apoptosis, invasion and angiogenesis processes, contributing to confer tumour cell radioresistance [13,14].

NF-kB is an ubiquitous TF that regulates gene expression profile of more than 200 target genes that have been shown to suppress apoptosis and to induce cellular transformation, proliferation, metastasis, radioresistance and inflammation in a wide variety of tumours [15]. NF-kB has a central role in immune and inflammatory responses because it regulates the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines such as Tumour Necrosis Factor alpha (TNF-α), Interleukine-1 (IL1), Interleukine-2 (IL2), Interleukine-6 (IL6) and Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 for inflammatory cells (MCP-1) [16].

Tumour cells usually express high levels of constitutive NF-kB [17]. IR can activate NF-kB via the Ataxia Telangiectasia mutated protein (ATM) or DNA-PK probably via MEK/ERK/p90 pathway as described by Panta et al. [18]. NF-kB pro-inflammatory responses generally require doses of 7–10 Gray (Gy), but low dose responses have also been observed [19]. The NF-kB activity modulation increases cell growth and survival advantage also through the activation of anti-apoptotic proteins such as BCL-xl, BFL-1/A1, NR13 [20-23]. ATM also phosphorylates p53, which exerts a crucial role following IR-induced DNA damage. As recently described, many IR- induced genes are p53-regulated but there is evidence for a substantial p53- independent IR transcriptional response, where NF-κB plays a contributing role to radioresistance [2]. Like p53, NF-κB activates a variety of genes ranging from cyclins to those involved in lipid signalling and translation [24,25]. Moreover, it was also demonstrated that inhibition of NF-kB activity increased sensitivity of cancer cells to the apoptotic action of different effectors or chemo-radiotherapies [26,27]. Another pathway that plays a key role in regulating the immune response to IR is driven by JAK-STAT signalling. The STAT proteins are considered to be important for cell viability in response to different stimuli such as IR [28,29].

It has been shown that STATs can have a significant role in tumour development and they are included among the potential oncogenes. In normal cells, the activation of STAT proteins is transient (from a few minutes to a few hours). However, constitutive activation of STAT family has been detected in different tumours [30,31]. In particular, STAT1 and STAT3 are very similar proteins (40% identity) that can often be activated by the same extracellular ligand (such as EGF, PDGF or IL-6). They appear to play opposite roles in tumourigenesis: STAT3 is considered an oncogene because it promotes cell survival/proliferation, while STAT1 enhances inflammation and immunity, triggering anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic responses in tumour cells [31,32].

As recently demonstrated, STAT3 is frequently activated in hematological and epithelial malignancies. This TF induces tumour-promoting inflammation and activates pro-oncogenic pathways (in conjunction”with NF-kB and IL-6) and up-regulates many pro-inflammatory genes such as cyclooxygenase COX-2, IL-1b, IL-6, and IL-8 [33-37]. STAT-3 activation has also been associated with both chemoresistance and radioresistance. STAT-3 mediates these effects through its collaboration with various other transcription factors, including NF-kB, hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF1), and peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-gamma (PPARG). Because of its critical role in tumourigenesis, inhibitors of this factor are being investigated for both cancer prevention and therapy. As described by Aggarwal BB et al. in metastatic breast cancer (BC) cells, chemoresistance is mediated through the up-regulation of anti-apoptotic gene products regulated by STAT-3 [38]. Thus, STAT-3 down modulation can overcome chemoresistance, while its inhibition could promote radiation sensitivity decreasing angiogenesis and cell survival as hypothesized by Kim KW et al. in MDA-MB-231 BC cells [39].

STAT1 plays a dual role in cancer development. Overall, STAT1 induces anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic genes such as caspases 3, 6, 8, FAS/FASL, p21waf1, c-myc that directly hamper tumour growth. Nevertheless, it has been shown that inappropriate STAT1 activation has also been observed in a variety of neoplastic cells of BC, head and neck squamous carcinoma and others [39,40]. Thus, STAT1 can also favour carcinogenesis and tumour survival. In addition, Khodarev NN et al. showed that ectopically STAT1 increased expression, can induce a radiation resistant phenotype [41]. Furthermore, Hui Z et al. observed that STAT1 down-regulation could significantly increase the radiosensitivity of renal carcinoma cell lines [42]. Thus, its role in acquired radioresistance seems to be based not solely on its transcription activity and needs further investigation.

In conclusion, a number of studies confirm that selective inhibitors of these pro-inflammatory pathways (NF-kB, STAT) could be associated to conventional radiation or chemotherapy [26,30,43] in order to increase their efficiency.

Cytokine production in response to ionizing radiation

RT has a significant effect on the immune system modulation through the activation of cytokine cascades [44]. The analysis of cancer cytokine signature is therefore a topic of interest in order to understand the roles of cytokines in cancer care [45-47]. Cytokines are produced by tumour cells and tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) and can greatly influence cellular radiosensitivity and the onset of tissue complications.

In vitro and in vivo cells and tissue exposure to IR induces the expression of many cytokines and growth factors such as: TNF-α, IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-6, type I IFN, GM-CSF [44,48-50], IL-4, IL-5, IL-10 [51], IL-12, IL-18 [52], and TGF-β [53].

Cytokine production is time-dependent, peaking usually at 4–24 hrs after irradiation with subsequent decrease to baseline levels within 24 hrs to a few days [54]. In all cases, the increase of cytokines and their effects have not yet been investigated at later times such as 72 hr after irradiation.

The balance between pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines is critical in determining a positive or a negative outcome, adverse reaction and resistance to radiation treatment [43]. Many different factors can influence the cytokine profiles produced after radiation exposure. For example, radiation dose, tissue type and the inborn characteristics of tumour cells can influence the local response into a pro- or anti-tumour effect [55,56]. In addition, it is important to realize that in vivo and in vitro cytokine expression profiles change greatly [57]. Moreover, the pathogenesis of in vivo radiation damage has a clear genetic basis, such as polymorphisms in cytokine genes which contribute to the considerable diversity between individuals both in terms of efficacy and adverse reactions [58,59].

Inflammatory reaction induced by RT is mediated by many inflammation-related cytokine genes (e.g., TNF-a, IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, IFN-γ, G-CSF, VEGF, and EGFR), within minutes to hours after an exogenous stress signal [44,50,60]. For example, elevated levels of TNF-α and IL-1 have been found after irradiation of various human or mammalian cells, such as alveolar macrophages or tumour cells [61,62] while an over-production of IL-6 and IL-8 has been described in keratinocytes, fibroblasts and glioma cells after both X-ray or UV exposure [63-65].

Wu CT et al. demonstrated that IL-6 up regulation was positively linked to radiation resistance while its inhibition enhanced the radiation sensitivity in prostate cancer cells [66].

On the other hand, the inflammation response down-regulation is partly due to the short half-life of the pro-inflammatory cytokines and to the production of the anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-4, IL-10, IL-13, and TGF-β [67,68]. These exert an anti-tumour effect, as well as, contributing to tumour immune surveillance escaping.

To date, a few studies have evaluated the cytokine production by cancer cells exposed to high or fractionated dose of IR. It has been suggested that a 20 Gy ablative dose of irradiation produces a more potent immune response than standard fractionation (4 fractions of 5 Gy), promoting the eradication of cancer cells [69].

Recently, Desai S and colleagues have evaluated the cytokines secretion profile of five human tumour cell lines. HT1080 (fibrosarcoma), U373MG (glioblastoma), HT29 (colon carcinoma), A549 (lung adenocarcinoma) and MCF-7 (breast adenocarcinoma), in order to compare their cytokine profiles either before (basal) or after acute (6 Gy) and fractionated doses (3 × 2 Gy) [70]. The authors observed that the secretion of certain cytokines was cell line-specific and that pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6), growth factors (PDGF-AA, TGF-α, TGF-β1) and chemokines (fractalkine, IL-8, MCP-1, and IP-10) were highly represented in irradiated conditioned medium (ICM) rather than immuno-modulatory cytokines (IFN-γ IL-2, IL-3, and IL-10). In addition, in all the cell lines studied except for MCF-7 BC, they showed that most of the cytokines increased markedly in a dose dependent manner and that the magnitude of such an increase was lower in ICM of tumour cells collected after fractionated IR doses compared to those collected after an acute dose [70].

In a recent study, Belletti B et al. analyzed how normal and mammary carcinoma cell growth and motility are affected by surgical wound fluids (WF) from patients treated with TARGeted Intraoperative radioTherapy (TARGIT). This technique uses a miniature X-ray source that delivers 20 Gy as a single dose of radiation on tumour bed. In this work, using proteomic and phospho-proteomic analysis the authors showed that TARGIT modified significantly the WF protein expression. In particular, after TARGIT treatment, they observed that various proteins including IL-6, MCP-1 and IL-8, and STAT3-drived pathways involved in controlling tumour cell growth and motility, were deregulated [71]. Furthermore, an increase of cytokines produced by Th2 cells (IL-13, IL-4, IL-5) able to induce the differentiation of “tumour-promoting M2 macrophages” expressing anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as TGF-β and IL-10 were described [72,73]. Considering that WF stimulate proliferation, migration, and invasion of BC cell lines [74], this work showed that a high dose of IR delivered by TARGIT could abrogate these processes having an antitumoural effect probably through several growth factors and secreted cytokines.

Cytokines can influence the dose-dependent IR response by their pleiotropic effects, modulating inflammation, invasiveness and fibrosis. For this reason these molecules represent a topic of special radiobiological interest.

Cytokine-mediated radiation fibrosis

As demonstrated in previous studies, radiation therapy could ultimately culminate in fibrosis [75], characterized by the deposition of collagen and other extracellular matrix components within the stroma and by the presence of atypical fibroblasts.

The IR induced fibrotic tissue remodelling is a multi-cellular process regulated by different cytokines such as TGF-β1, TNF-α, IL-1, IL-4 and IL-13; chemokines such as MCP-1, MIP-1β; angiogenic and growth factors [76-78].

There is substantial evidence that TGF-β1 is primarily involved in normal tissue injury and plays a critical role in the initiation, development, and persistence of radiation induced fibrosis [79]. TGF-β1 belongs to a family of secreted polypeptide growth factors sub-categorized by function, including its three mammalian isoforms (TGF-β1, TGF-β2, and TGF-β3). TGF-β activity is regulated by the latency-associated protein (LAP), and by the latent TGF-β binding protein (LTBP), forming a larger complex called “the large latent complex” (LLC), which can be activated by various physico-chemical treatments or by proteases [80]. In particular, IR increases TGF-ß1 expression and also induces the extracellular activation of the latent complex by proteolytic cleavage in response to the production of reactive oxygen species generated by radiation [81]. TGF-β signals activate the Smad proteins [82], acting as both transduction proteins and transcription factors, able to regulate gene expression of various targets, including procollagen I and III [83].

Moreover, the fibroblasts activation into myofibroblasts is another key step in radiation fibrosis where these cells play an active role in the synthesis and remodelling of extracellular matrix (ECM) components, including collagens. Myofibroblasts are specialized contractile cells that cause aberrant ECM deposition by TGF-β1 activation [84,85]. The resulting increase of matrix proteins, such as collagen and fibronectin, decreases the synthesis of matrix-degrading proteases, and enhances the production of their inhibitors [63,86-88].

In line with these assumptions, Li C et al. demonstrated that BC patients showing high plasma TGF-β1 levels have a major risk of developing post-radiotherapy fibrosis, suggesting its predictive role in IR tumour response [89]. In agreement with these data are those published by Bouquet F and colleagues [90]. These authors demonstrated that TGF-β1 inhibition increases in vitro BC radiosensitivity and promotes in vivo tumour control by radiation, once again highlighting the relevance of this immune biomarker evaluation during cancer IR treatment. Therefore, TGF-β1 would represent a potential target for molecular therapies designed to prevent or reduce normal tissue injury after IR cancer therapy.

There is some evidence that the IL-4 and IL-13 Th2 cytokines, cooperate with TGF-β to induce fibrosis [91]. IL-4 has long been considered a potent pro-fibrotic mediator nearly twice as effective as TGF-β [92]. This is able to induce the ECM proteins synthesis, collagens and fibronectin. Interestingly, the development of post-irradiation fibrosis is also associated to increased IL-4 production [77,93]. IL-13 shares many properties and functional activities similar to IL-4, as they show common receptor subunits (IL-4Rα), signal transduction pathways and transcription factors (STAT-6) [94]. IL-13 triggers the fibroblasts differentiation into myofibroblasts, induces the production of latent TGF-β1 by macrophages and can also function as its indirect activator by up regulating the expression of LAP cleaved proteins [95,96].

Finally, even the IL-1 and TNF-α pro-inflammatory cytokines have been implicated in fibrosis development. IL-1β is directly up-regulated by radiation and it is known to activate other inflammation-related molecules such as the matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), a group of zinc-dependent enzymes that regulate or degrade ECM components [97]. Regarding TNF-α, many studies have documented its role in fibrosis development [98,99]. Various strategies involving its inactivation have been designed to protect normal tissue by post-radiation damage. For example, as reported by Przybyszewska M et al. the use of a TNF-α soluble receptor may represent a simple method to partially neutralize TNF-α activity and prevent radiation-induced lung injury [100]. In addition, TNF-α expression leads to the TGF-β1 induction. These two factors, in tandem, regulate IR induced fibrosis acting through multiple mechanisms that need to be largely explored [101].

Invasiveness, radiation and cytokines

Inflammatory IR response can favour cancer cells invasion, providing a favorable environment for tumour promotion and metastasis [8,10,102-104].

The radiation ability to increase cancer cell invasiveness has been reported for BC, pancreatic, rectal and colon cancer cells [105-107]. IR can alter cell phenotypes which in turn contribute, directly or indirectly, to carcinogenesis and also affects the activity or abundance of proteases, growth factors, cytokines, and adhesion proteins which are involved in tissue remodelling [108].

Both IL-8 and IL-6 are involved in IR inflammatory response, enhancing cancer cell invasiveness [109].

IL-8 is a member of the CXC chemokines superfamily and has a wide range of pro-inflammatory effects. It was initially described as a neutrophil and lymphocyte chemo-attractant [110] but has subsequently been identified as a pro-angiogenic agent in a wide range of human malignancies [111,112]. For example, as reported by De Larco JE et al. in BC cells the metastatic phenotype is strongly correlated with IL-8 expression, suggesting it as a prognostic metastatic biomarker [113]. This chemokine is probably up-regulated in a dose dependent-manner, as described by Singh RK et al. in human melanoma cells and by Meeren AV et al. in endothelial cell lines, in tandem with IL-6 production [114,115].

IL-6 is one of the most important pro-inflammatory cytokine but it has also been considered to have an anti-inflammatory role for its ability to induce IL-1 and TNF-α antagonists [68]. IL-6 has been reported to be increased in a variety of tumours, contributing to aggressive tumour growth and resistance to treatment [116-119]. Circulating IL-6 levels are positively associated to a clinical tumour stage, lymph node infiltration, and the number of distant metastases in BC patients [120,121]. In turn, in BC cells it has been described that the IL-6 JAK/STAT3 pathway could promote BC progression, metastasis, resistance to treatment [122] and, at the same time, IL-6 induced through STAT3 can then activate IL-6/STAT3 signalling in neighbouring cells.

In addition, the IR induced IL-1β expression can also favour cancer cell invasion. For example, in BC patients, elevated IL-1β plasma levels have been shown to persist for a few weeks after radiotherapy [123]. IL-1β is involved in the enhancement of BC cell invasion induced by radiation. As described by Paquette B et al., this cytokine can also enhance cancer cell invasion acting as a chemo-attractant agent for MDA MB-231 BC cells [124]. The authors suggested that the effect of IL1β on these BC cell invasiveness involves the elevation of MMP-9 production, the induction of COX-2 expression and the prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) biosynthesis.

Moreover, some preclinical models suggest that radiation activated TGF-β could contribute to metastasis inducing the appearance of mesenchymal characteristics [125-127]. Several lines of evidence have led researchers to link this morphological shift during carcinogenesis to the process of epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT), which is an important step in cancer invasion and metastasis [128-130]. In particular Zhou YC et al. suggested that TGF-β mediated EMT plays a critical role in enhancing the migratory and the invasive capabilities of the IR induced cancer cells [131]. The complexity of the radiation effects mediated by TGF-β will require further study to determine whether it plays a proximal role in promoting radiogenic carcinogenesis.

These data advocate the need of further clarification on the ability of radiation to increase the invasiveness of cancer cells, probably mediated by immunological factors.

Radiation and inflammation combined cancer therapies

Nowadays, combinatorial anticancer therapy is an established clinical practice. This is based on the principle that stand-alone, chemo or radio-therapeutic regimens are generally unable to control neoplastic lesions, whereas combining therapeutic agents with dissimilar action mechanisms potentially results in synergistic anti-neoplastic effects [132-135].

IR leads to the activation of several immunological proteins and TFs modulating the expression of numerous immune mediators that may promote cancer development. Thus, targeting the IR induced inflammatory signalling pathways offers the opportunity to improve the radiation therapy clinical outcomes by enhancing radiosensitivity [103,136].

For example, as described in literature, the disruption of NF-kB signalling could be associated to conventional cancer therapies in order to increase their efficiency [137], specifically to improve treatment programmes for chemo-resistant and or radio-resistant cancers. Different approaches to inhibit NF-kB activity are proposed in various models [138-140]. It has been observed that the IKB over-expression sensitizes human glioblastoma, fibroblast and intestinal epithelial cells to radiations [141]. In recent years the NF-κB inhibition by synthetic compounds as well as nutraceuticals factors has been approved for tumour radio-sensitization [142]. In particular the use of the herbal medicine curcumin has become a useful approach due to the anti-inflammatory properties in conjunction with low toxicity risk. Furthermore, curcumin has been shown to down-regulate the NF-kB expression and STAT-3 phosphorylation [143]. Another relevant NF-kB mediated-response to IR DNA damage is induced by the activation of the autocrine TNFα-TNFR1 signalling able to cause IkB proteasomal degradation and the final NF-kB activation. TNF-α is both an inductor and a gene target gene of NF-kB [29,30]. Its induction could create a loop which amplifies the effects of radiation. Thus, the NF-kB inhibition results in a complex network, either an increased apoptosis of irradiated cells, or a lower TNF-α production decreasing the therapeutic effects of radiations [137,144,145].

Radiation is also known to induce inflammation through COX-2. COX is the key enzyme required for the conversion of arachidonic acid to prostaglandins [146,147]. It is a central enzyme in the inflammatory response, its activity in cancer cells can be directly stimulated by NF-kB after radiation exposure or indirectly through some cytokines activity, such as IL-1β [124,148]. The COX-2 over-expression has been shown in patients with various types of cancers. In particular COX-2 up regulation is associated to higher tumour grade and distant metastases in BC [148,149]. This protein has assumed an important role as therapeutic target for anticancer and anti-inflammatory therapies because its inhibition by drugs such as ascoxibs, celecoxib, and SC-236, represents a radio-sensitization strategy [150,151].

In mammalian cells, IR can elicit the activation of multiple targets and key TFs, including the above mentioned STAT3, representing a promising therapeutic target for preventing inflammation-mediated cancers [39]. In the past few years several new molecules inhibiting STAT3 (such as small interfering RNAs, oligonucleotides, small molecules) were tested both in vitro and in vivo approaches [152-155]. Stable transfection with shRNA against STAT3 results in enhanced radiosensitivity of human squamous carcinoma (A431) cells [156]. Targeting of STAT1 might be a potential strategy to sensitize cancer cells. Zhan JF and colleagues, provided the first evidence that STAT1 signalling contributes to radioresistance in BC initiating cells, revealing STAT1 as a promising target to reduce radioresistance [157]. For instance, Hui Z et al. observed that the STAT1 down-regulation sensitizes renal cell carcinoma (RCC) to chemotherapy and radiotherapy [42].

In addition, the previously mentioned cytokines IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-8, IL-6 or TGF-β can influence the response to IR, inducing inflammation, cancer cells invasiveness and fibrosis in irradiated tissues, encouraging the hypothesis of the use of specific inhibitors or drugs able to manipulate cytokine pathways, in order to improve radiation research and therapy. For example, Salem K and colleagues have recently demonstrated that the combined treatment with the two chemotherapeutic drugs dexamethasone (Dex) and bortezomib (BTZ) attenuates paracrine IL-6 secretion from irradiated stromal cells, contributing to myeloma cell death and the inhibition of therapy resistance [42]. The authors suggested that the Dex and BTZ combined treatment may effectively eradicate myeloma cells in their native bone marrow microenvironment in patients undergoing oxidative stress-induced therapy, since the Dex treatment effectively reduces IL-6 secretion from irradiated stroma and BTZ has been shown to be effective in blunting IL-6-mediated survival signalling in myeloma cells [42]. It will be of particular interest to analyze the results of multiple clinical trials that are currently evaluating the safety and the anti-neoplastic profile of radio-immunotherapeutic based regimens in cancer patients. Hence, the use of specific inhibitors and the manipulation of cytokine pathways, involved in cancer cell proliferation and metastasis, are very important to improve radiation therapy [158,159]. Pre-clinical studies have demonstrated that combining radiotherapy with immune stimulation can induce an anti-tumour immunity, enhancing cell death [132-135]. In order to optimize and personalize radiation-therapy treatment for each patient, a multi-parametric approach would be useful to identify several potential targets that may affect radio-response.

Future perspectives of a IORT inflammatory response evaluation

Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) is particularly appealing to patients and physicians, because the procedure is fast, convenient, spares normal tissue to a considerable extent and is able to solve some clinical problems, like the integration with chemotherapy with respect to conventional RT [160]. IORT differs from conventional RT since a large dose in a single fraction during surgery is delivered. The BC IORT treatment, according to specific eligibility criteria, may be performed using two different protocols: exclusive with the provision of a single radiation dose of 21–23 Gy, corresponding to the administration of the entire sequence of a conventional adjuvant RT or as an anticipated boost of 9–12 Gy, followed by conventional external RT treatment [161,162]. This potentially eliminates repopulation of residual tumour cells that may occur during wound healing before post-operative radiotherapy can begin. IORT with electrons was associated with about the same number of distant metastases and deaths as external RT, showing that distant disease control and overall survival are much the same in two treatment groups, at least in the short term. The continued active follow-up of patients in medical trial will allow to reassess the safety of IORT with electrons on the development of distant metastases and death in the long term [163,164].

Most radiobiological studies on cell lines have been performed in the dose range 1–8 Gy where cellular radiation effects, including clonogenic inactivation and survival can be studied properly. However, some evidence suggests that high single doses used in IORT may produce different effects from those seen after conventional fraction sizes [164,165].

Few papers describe the role of inflammatory response to high doses of IR, such as those used in IORT treatments, rendering in this field the necessity of being explored and clarified. Some evidence suggests that high single-dose regimens are more efficient than low-dose regimens to trigger both innate and adaptive anti tumour immunity [71]. For example, in the above mentioned study by Belletti et al. was demonstrated that TARGIT treatment modified significantly the protein expression of the WF [71]. In addition, the WF from TARGIT-treated patients showed a modified expression of certain cytokines, and loss of the ability to induce the activation of some intracellular signal transduction pathways. As above described, WF stimulate proliferation, migration, and invasion of BC cell lines, showing that a high dose of IR delivered by TARGIT could abrogate these processes producing an antitumoural effect probably through several growth factors and secreted cytokines [74]. It opens a novel avenue for identifying new molecular targets and testing novel therapeutic agents depending also to high dose delivered that need to be further explored considering limited but encouraging available data on this topic [166,167].

In order to highlight the molecular mechanisms involved in the response/resistance to IORT treatment, our research group is performing the study of IR effects on BC cells subjected to high dose treatment modalities and their correlation with genetic background and molecular gene expression. Regarding the inflammatory response, in particular, we are focusing our attention on immunogenic factors induced by a high dose of radiation, in order to identify potential biomarkers that could influence radio-resistance or down regulate BC cells invasiveness, as well as markers that may have a prognostic value for cancer treatment.

Conclusion

RT has extensively been employed as a curative or palliative intervention against cancer throughout the last century, with a varying degree of success. IR activates complex cross-linked intracellular pathways able to define cell fate, determining the outcome between survival and death regulating several factors involved in inflammation, DNA repair, cell survival or death (summarized in Figure 1) [2]. The immune system plays a pivotal role controlling tumour development, suppression or tumour progression [8]. This review represents an overview, of the most recently available data regarding the main networks activated after IR exposure, cytokines pivotal roles in invasiveness and fibrosis radiation-related and radio-immune combined cancer therapies updates.
Figure 1

Immunological response to IR. The figure displays how IR could stimulate key transcription factors modulating inflammatory gene expression profile and cytokines involved in invasiveness and radiation related fibrosis. Targeting Nf-kB and STAT-3 IR activated, could offer the opportunity to improve radiation therapy by enhancing radiosensitivity.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by FIRB/MERIT (RBNE089KHH).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Pathobiology and Medical and Forensic Biotechnologies, University of Palermo
(2)
IBFM CNR – LATO, Contrada Pietrapollastra Pisciotto
(3)
Department of Health Sciences, Tecnomed Foundation, University of Milano-Bicocca
(4)
Nuclear Medicine Center, San Gerardo Hospital
(5)
Nuclear Medicine, San Raffaele Scientific Institute

References

  1. Bernier J, Hall EJ, Giaccia A. Radiation oncology: a century of achievements. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4:737–47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Minafra L, Bravatà V. Cell and molecular response to IORT treatment. Transl Cancer Res. 2014;3:32–47.Google Scholar
  3. Wu S, Li Q, Zhou J, Sun J, Li F, Lin Q, et al. Post-mastectomy radiotherapy can improve survival in breast cancer patients aged 35 years or younger with four or more positive nodes but not in one to three positive nodes. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2014;10:867–74.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Rodemann HP, Blaese MA. Responses of normal cells to ionizing radiation. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2007;17:81–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Brigati C, Noonan DM, Albini A, Benelli R. Tumors and inflammatory infiltrates: friends or foes? Clin Exp Metastasis. 2002;19:247–58.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Balkwill F, Mantovani A. Inflammation and cancer: back to Virchow? Lancet. 2001;357:539–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Caruso C, Lio D, Cavallone L, Franceschi C. Aging, longevity, inflammation, and cancer. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004;1028:1–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Grivennikov SI, Greten FR, Karin M. Immunity, inflammation, and cancer. Cell. 2010;140:883–99.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Multhoff G, Radons J. Radiation, inflammation, and immune responses in cancer. Front Oncol. 2012;2:58.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Deorukhkar A, Krishnan S. Targeting inflammatory pathways for tumor radiosensitization. Biochem Pharmacol. 2010;80:1904–14.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dent P, Yacoub A, Contessa J, Caron R, Amorino G, Valerie K, et al. Stress and radiation-induced activation of multiple intracellular signaling pathways. Radiat Res. 2003;159:283–300.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Criswell T, Leskov K, Miyamoto S, Luo G, Boothman DA. Transcription factors activated in mammalian cells after clinically relevant doses of ionizing radiation. Oncogene. 2003;22:5813–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Aggarwal BB, Sethi G, Ahn KS, Sandur SK, Pandey MK, Kunnumakkara AB, et al. Targeting signal-transducer-and-activator-of-transcription-3 for prevention and therapy of cancer: modern target but ancient solution. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1091:151–69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Shimamura H, Terada Y, Okado T, Tanaka H, Inoshita S, Sasaki S. The PI3-kinase-Akt pathway promotes mesangial cell survival and inhibits apoptosis in vitro via NF-kappa B and Bad. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003;14:1427–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Aravindan S, Natarajan M, Ramraj SK, Pandian V, Khan FH, Herman TS, et al. Abscopal effect of low-LET γ-radiation mediated through Rel protein signal transduction in a mouse model of non targeted radiation response. Cancer Gene Ther. 2014;21:54–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lin Y, Bai L, Chen W, Xu S. The NF-kappaB activation pathways, emerging molecular targets for cancer prevention and therapy. Expert OpinTher Targets. 2010;14:45–55.Google Scholar
  17. Karin M. Nuclear factor-kappaB in cancer development and progression. Nature. 2006;441:431–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Panta GR, Kaur S, Cavin LG, Cortés ML, Mercurio F, Lothstein L, et al. ATM and the catalytic subunit of DNA-dependent protein kinase activate NF-kappaB through a common MEK/extracellular signal-regulated kinase/p90 (rsk) signaling pathway in response to distinct forms of DNA damage. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24:1823–35.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Rho HS, Kim SH, Lee CE. Mechanism of NF-kappaB activation induced by gamma-irradiation in B lymphoma cells: role of Ras. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2005;68:2019–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Ahn KS, Aggarwal BB. Transcription factor NF-kappaB: a sensor for smoke and stress signals. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005;1056:218–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Janssens S, Tschopp J. Signals from within: the DNA-damage-induced NF-kappaB response. Cell Death Differ. 2006;13:773–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Rasoulpour RJ, Boekelheide K. NF-kappaB activation elicited by ionizing radiation is pro apoptotic in testis. Biol Reprod. 2007;76:279–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. McCool KW, Miyamoto S. DNA damage-dependent NF-κB activation: NEMO turns nuclear signaling inside out. Immunol Rev. 2012;246:311–26.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Park WY, Hwang CI, Im CN, Kang MJ, Woo JH, Kim JH, et al. Identification of radiation-specific responses from gene expression profile. Oncogene. 2002;21:8521–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Chaudhry MA, Chodosh LA, McKenna WG, Muschel RJ. Gene expression profile of human cells irradiated in G1 and G2 phases of cell cycle. Cancer Lett. 2003;195:221–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Starenki D, Namba H, Saenko V, Ohtsuru A, Yamashita S. Inhibition of nuclear factor-kappaB cascade potentiates the effect of a combination treatment of anaplastic thyroid cancer cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89:410–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Yamamoto Y, Gaynor RB. Therapeutic potential of inhibition of the NF-kappaB pathway in the treatment of inflammation and cancer. J Clin Invest. 2001;107:135–42.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Poczeta M, Bednarek I, Nowak E, Galilejczyk A, Gawlik N. Silencing of the STAT3 gene expression activity and cancer cells metastatic potential at in vitro studies. Wiad Lek. 2013;66:226–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Murray PJ. The JAK-STAT signaling pathway: input and output integration. J Immunol. 2007;178:2623–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Yu H, Pardoll D, Jove R. STATs in cancer inflammation and immunity: a leading role for STAT3. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009;9:798–809.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Calò V, Migliavacca M, Bazan V, Macaluso M, Buscemi M, Gebbia N, et al. STAT proteins: from normal control of cellular events to tumorigenesis. J Cell Physiol. 2003;197:157–68.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Shen Y, Devgan G, Darnell Jr JE, Bromberg JF. Constitutively activated Stat3 protects fibroblasts from serum withdrawal and UV-induced apoptosis and antagonizes the proapoptotic effects of activated Stat1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:1543–8.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Judd LM, Menheniott TR, Ling H, Jackson CB, Howlett M, Kalantzis A, et al. Inhibition of the JAK2/STAT3 pathway reduces gastric cancer growth In vitro and In vivo. PLoS One. 2014;9:e95993.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Yang J, Liao X, Agarwal MK, Barnes L, Auron PE, Stark GR. Unphosphorylated STAT3 accumulates in response to IL-6 and activates transcription by binding to NFkappaB. Genes Dev. 2007;21:1396–408.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Lo HW, Cao X, Zhu H, Ali-Osman F. Cyclooxygenase-2 is a novel transcriptional target of the nuclear EGFR-STAT3 and EGFRvIII-STAT3 signaling axes. Mol Cancer Res. 2010;8:232–45.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Samavati L, Rastogi R, Du W, Hüttemann M, Fite A, Franchi L. STAT3 tyrosine phosphorylation is critical for interleukin 1 beta and interleukin-6 production in response to lipopolysaccharide and live bacteria. Mol Immunol. 2009;46:1867–77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Trevino JG, Gray MJ, Nawrocki ST, Summy JM, Lesslie DP, Evans DB, et al. Src activation of Stat3 is an independent requirement from NF-kappaB activation for constitutive IL-8 expression in human pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells. Angiogenesis. 2006;9:101–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Aggarwal BB, Kunnumakkara AB, Harikumar KB, Gupta SR, Tharakan ST, Koca C, et al. Signal transducer and activator of transcription-3, inflammation, and cancer: how intimate is the relationship? Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009;1171:59–76.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Kim KW, Mutter RW, Cao C, Albert JM, Shinohara ET, Sekhar KR, et al. Inhibition of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 activity results in down-regulation of Survivin following irradiation. Mol Cancer Ther. 2006;5:2659–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Avalle L, Pensa S, Regis G, Novelli F, Poli V. STAT1 and STAT3 in tumorigenesis: a matter of balance. JAKSTAT. 2012;1:65–72.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Khodarev NN, Roach P, Pitroda SP, Golden DW, Bhayani M, Shao MY, et al. STAT1 pathway mediates amplification of metastatic potential and resistance to therapy. PLoS One. 2009;4:e5821.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Hui Z, Tretiakova M, Zhang Z, Li Y, Wang X, Zhu JX, et al. Radiosensitization by inhibiting STAT1 in renal cell carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;73:288–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Sun Y, Cheng MK, Griffiths TR, Mellon JK, Kai B, Kriajevska M, et al. Inhibition of STAT signalling in bladder cancer by diindolylmethane: relevance to cell adhesion, migration and proliferation. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2013;13(1):57–68.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Schaue D, Kachikwu EL, McBride WH. Cytokines in radiobiological responses: a review. Radiat Res. 2012;178:505–23.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Bravatà V, Cammarata FP, Forte GI, Minafra L. “Omics” of HER2-positive breast cancer. OMICS. 2013;17:119–29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Scola L, Vaglica M, Crivello A, Palmeri L, Forte GI, Macaluso MC, et al. Cytokine gene polymorphisms and breast cancer susceptibility. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1089:104–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Scola L, Di Maggio FM, Vaccarino L, Bova M, Forte GI, Pisano C, et al. Role of TGF-β pathway polymorphisms in sporadic thoracic aortic aneurysm: rs900 TGF-β2 is a marker of differential gender susceptibility. Mediators Inflamm. 2014;2014:165758.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Hong JH, Chiang CS, Tsao CY, Lin PY, McBride WH, Wu CJ. Rapid induction of cytokine gene expression in the lung after single and fractionated doses of radiation. Int J Radiat Biol. 1999;75:1421–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Burnette BC, Liang H, Lee Y, Chlewicki L, Khodarev NN, Weichselbaum RR, et al. The efficacy of radiotherapy relies upon induction of type I interferon-dependent innate and adaptive immunity. Cancer Res. 2011;71:2488–96.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Hao S, Baltimore D. The stability of mRNA influences the temporal order of the induction of genes encoding inflammatory molecules. Nat Immunol. 2009;10:281–8.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Han SK, Song JY, Yun YS, Yi SY. Effect of gamma radiation on cytokine expression and cytokine-receptor mediated STAT activation. Int J Radiat Biol. 2006;82:686–97.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Shan YX, Jin SZ, Liu XD, Liu Y, Liu SZ. Ionizing radiation stimulates secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines: dose–response relationship, mechanisms and implications. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2007;46:21–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Dancea HC, Shareef MM, Ahmed MM. Role of Radiation-induced TGF-beta Signaling in Cancer Therapy. Mol Cell Pharmacol. 2009;1:44–56.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Hong JH, Chiang CS, Campbell IL, Sun JR, Withers HR, McBride WH. Induction of acute phase gene expression by brain irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;33:619–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Formenti SC, Demaria S. Systemic effects of local radiotherapy. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:718–26.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Munro AJ. Bystander effects and their implications for clinical radiotherapy. J Radiol Prot. 2009;29:A133–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Chiang CS, Chen FH, Hong JH, Jiang PS, Huang HL, Wang CC, et al. Functional phenotype of macrophages depends on assay procedures. Int Immunol. 2008;20:215–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Venkatesh GH, Manjunath VB, Mumbrekar KD, Negi H, Fernandes DJ, Sharan K, et al. Polymorphisms in radio-responsive genes and its association with acute toxicity among head and neck cancer patients. PLoS One. 2014;9:e89079.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Bravatà V, Stefano A, Cammarata FP, Minafra L, Russo G, Nicolosi S, et al. Genotyping analysis and 18FDG uptake in breast cancer patients: a preliminary research. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2013;32:23.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Kil WJ, Tofilon PJ, Camphausen K. Post-radiation increase in VEGF enhances glioma cell motility in vitro. Radiat Oncol. 2012;7:25.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Veeraraghavan J, Natarajan M, Aravindan S, Herman TS, Aravindan N. Radiation-triggered tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha-NFkappaB cross-signaling favors survival advantage in human neuroblastoma cells. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:21588–600.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. O'Brien-Ladner A, Nelson ME, Kimler BF, Wesselius LJ. Release of interleukin-1 by human alveolar macrophages after in vitro irradiation. Radiat Res. 1993;136:37–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Müller K, Meineke V. Radiation-induced alterations in cytokine production by skin cells. Exp Hematol. 2007;35:96–104.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Chou CH, Chen SU, Cheng JC. Radiation-induced interleukin-6 expression through MAPK/p38/NF-kappaB signaling pathway and the resultant antiapoptotic effect on endothelial cells through Mcl-1 expression with sIL6-Ralpha. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;75:1553–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Kondo S, Kono T, Sauder DN, McKenzie RC. IL-8 gene expression and production in human keratinocytes and their modulation by UVB. J Invest Dermatol. 1993;101:690–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Wu CT, Chen MF, Chen WC, Hsieh CC. The role of IL-6 in the radiation response of prostate cancer. Radiat Oncol. 2013;8:159.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Koj A. Termination of acute-phase response: role of some cytokines and anti-inflammatory drugs. Gen Pharmacol. 1998;31:9–18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Sultani M, Stringer AM, Bowen JM, Gibson RJ. Anti-inflammatory cytokines: important immunoregulatory factors contributing to chemotherapy-induced gastrointestinal mucositis. Chemother Res Pract. 2012;2012:490804.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Lee Y, Auh SL, Wang Y, Burnette B, Wang Y, Meng Y, et al. Therapeutic effects of ablative radiation on local tumor require CD8+ T cells: changing strategies for cancer treatment. Blood. 2009;114:589–95.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Desai S, Kumar A, Laskar S, Pandey BN. Cytokine profile of conditioned medium from human tumor cell lines after acute and fractionated doses of gamma radiation and its effect on survival of bystander tumor cells. Cytokine. 2013;61:54–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Belletti B, Vaidya JS, D'Andrea S, Entschladen F, Roncadin M, Lovat F, et al. Targeted intraoperative radiotherapy impairs the stimulation of breast cancer cell proliferation and invasion caused by surgical wounding. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:1325–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Gajewski TF, Schreiber H, Fu YX. Innate and adaptive immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. Nat Immunol. 2013;14:1014–22.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Hao NB, Lü MH, Fan YH, Cao YL, Zhang ZR, Yang SM. Macrophages in tumor microenvironments and the progression of tumors. Clin Dev Immunol. 2012;2012:948098.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Tagliabue E, Agresti R, Carcangiu ML, Ghirelli C, Morelli D, Campiglio M, et al. Role of HER2 in wound-induced breast carcinoma proliferation. Lancet. 2003;362:527–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Westbury CB, Yarnold JR. Radiation fibrosis–current clinical and therapeutic perspectives. ClinOncol (R CollRadiol). 2012;24:657–72.Google Scholar
  76. Johnston CJ, Piedboeuf B, Rubin P, Williams JP, Baggs R, Finkelstein JN. Early and persistent alterations in the expression of interleukin-1 alpha, interleukin-1 beta and tumor necrosis factor alpha mRNA levels in fibrosis-resistant and sensitive mice after thoracic irradiation. Radiat Res. 1996;145:762–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Büttner C, Skupin A, Reimann T, Rieber EP, Unteregger G, Geyer P, et al. Local production of interleukin-4 during radiation-induced pneumonitis and pulmonary fibrosis in rats: macrophages as a prominent source of interleukin-4. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1997;17:315–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Rubin P, Johnston CJ, Williams JP, McDonald S, Finkelstein JN. A perpetual cascade of cytokines post irradiation leads to pulmonary fibrosis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;33:99–109.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Yarnold J, Brotons MC. Pathogenetic mechanisms in radiation fibrosis. Radiother Oncol. 2010;97:149–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Massagué J. TGF-beta in cancer. Cell. 2008;134:215–30.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Jobling MF, Mott JD, Finnegan MT, Jurukovski V, Erickson AC, Walian PJ, et al. Isoform-specific activation of latent transforming growth factor beta (LTGF-beta) by reactive oxygen species. Radiat Res. 2006;166:839–48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Shi Y, Massagué J. Mechanisms of TGF-beta signaling from cell membrane to the nucleus. Cell. 2003;113:685–700.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Roberts AB, Russo A, Felici A, Flanders KC. Smad3: a key player in pathogenetic mechanisms dependent on TGF-beta. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003;995:1–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Tomasek JJ, Gabbiani G, Hinz B, Chaponnier C, Brown RA. Myofibroblasts and mechano-regulation of connective tissue remodelling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2002;3:349–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Sheppard D. Transforming growth factor beta: a central modulator of pulmonary and airway inflammation and fibrosis. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2006;3:413–7.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Sandler NG, Mentink-Kane MM, Cheever AW, Wynn TA. Global gene expression profiles during acute pathogen-induced pulmonary inflammation reveal divergent roles for Th1 and Th2 responses in tissue repair. J Immunol. 2003;171(7):3655–67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Martin M, Lefaix J, Delanian S. TGF-beta1 and radiation fibrosis: a master switch and a specific therapeutic target? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;47:277–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Strup-Perrot C, Mathé D, Linard C, Violot D, Milliat F, François A, et al. Global gene expression profiles reveal an increase in mRNA levels of collagens, MMPs, and TIMPs in late radiation enteritis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2004;287:G875–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Li C, Wilson PB, Levine E, Barber J, Stewart AL, Kumar S. TGF-beta1 levels in pre-treatment plasma identify breast cancer patients at risk of developing post-radiotherapy fibrosis. Int J Cancer. 1999;84:155–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Bouquet F, Pal A, Pilones KA, Demaria S, Hann B, Akhurst RJ, et al. TGFβ1 inhibition increases the radiosensitivity of breast cancer cells in vitro and promotes tumor control by radiation in vivo. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:6754–65.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Lee CG, Homer RJ, Zhu Z, Lanone S, Wang X, Koteliansky V, et al. Interleukin-13 induces tissue fibrosis by selectively stimulating and activating transforming growth factor beta (1). J Exp Med. 2001;194:809–21.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Fichtner-Feigl S, Young CA, Kitani A, Geissler EK, Schlitt HJ, Strober W. IL-13 signaling via IL-13R alpha2 induces major downstream fibrogenic factors mediating fibrosis in chronic TNBS colitis. Gastroenterology. 2008;135:2003–13–2013.e1-7.Google Scholar
  93. Chung EJ, Hudak K, Horton JA, White A, Scroggins BT, Vaswani S, et al. Transforming growth factor alpha is a critical mediator of radiation lung injury. Radiat Res. 2014;182(3):350–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Fichtner-Feigl S, Fuss IJ, Young CA, Watanabe T, Geissler EK, Schlitt HJ, et al. Induction of IL-13 triggers TGF-beta1-dependent tissue fibrosis in chronic 2,4,6-trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid colitis. J Immunol. 2007;178:5859–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Webb DC, Mahalingam S, Cai Y, Matthaei KI, Donaldson DD, Foster PS. Antigen-specific production of interleukin (IL)-13 and IL-5 cooperate to mediate IL-4R alpha-independent airway hyper reactivity. Eur J Immunol. 2003;33:3377–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Lanone S, Zheng T, Zhu Z, Liu W, Lee CG, Ma B, et al. Overlapping and enzyme-specific contributions of matrix metalloproteinases-9 and −12 inIL-13-induced inflammation and remodeling. J Clin Invest. 2002;110:463–74.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Liu W, Ding I, Chen K, Olschowka J, Xu J, Hu D, et al. Interleukin 1beta (IL1B) signaling is a critical component of radiation-induced skin fibrosis. Radiat Res. 2006;165:181–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Lee JW, Zoumalan RA, Valenzuela CD, Nguyen PD, Tutela JP, Roman BR, et al. Regulators and mediators of radiation-induced fibrosis: Gene expression profiles and a rationale for Smad3 inhibition. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;143:525–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Oikonomou N, Harokopos V, Zalevsky J, Valavanis C, Kotanidou A, Szymkowski DE, et al. Soluble TNF mediates the transition from pulmonary inflammation to fibrosis. PLoS One. 2006;1:e108.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Przybyszewska M, Miłoszewska J, Rzońca S, Trembacz H, Pyśniak K, Kotlarz A, et al. Soluble TNF-α receptor I encoded on plasmid vector and its application in experimental gene therapy of radiation-induced lung fibrosis. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2011;59:315–26.Google Scholar
  101. Sullivan DE, Ferris M, Pociask D, Brody AR. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha induces transforming growth factor-beta1 expression in lung fibroblasts through the extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathway. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2005;32:342–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Barcellos-Hoff MH, Park C, Wright EG. Radiation and the microenvironment tumorigenesis and therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005;5:867–75.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Takahashi H, Jin C, Rajabi H, Pitroda S, Alam M, Ahmad R, et al. MUC1-C activates the TAK1 inflammatory pathway in colon cancer. Oncogene. 2015; [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
  104. Rüegg C, Monnier Y, Kuonen F, Imaizumi N. Radiation-induced modifications of the tumor microenvironment promote metastasis. Bull Cancer. 2011;98:47–57.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Qian LW, Mizumoto K, Urashima T, Nagai E, Maehara N, Sato N, et al. Radiation-induced increase in invasive potential of human pancreatic cancer cells and its blockade by a matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor, CGS27023. Clin Cancer Res. 2002;8:1223–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Speake WJ, Dean RA, Kumar A, Morris TM, Scholefield JH, Watson SA. Radiation induced MMP expression from rectal cancer is short lived but contributes to in vitro invasion. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2005;31:869–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Wang JL, Sun Y, Wu S. Gamma-irradiation induces matrix metalloproteinase II expression in a p53-dependent manner. Mol Carcinog. 2000;27:252–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. Zhai GG, Malhotra R, Delaney M, Latham D, Nestler U, Zhang M, et al. Radiation enhances the invasive potential of primary glioblastoma cells via activation of the Rho signaling pathway. J Neurooncol. 2006;76:227–37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. Pasi F, Facoetti A, Nano R. IL-8 and IL-6 bystander signalling in human glioblastoma cells exposed to gamma radiation. Anticancer Res. 2010;30:2769–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. Qazi BS, Tang K, Qazi A. Recent advances in underlying pathologies provide insight into interleukin-8 expression-mediated inflammation and angiogenesis. Int J Inflam. 2011;2011:908468.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. Hou Y, Ryu CH, Jun JA, Kim SM, Jeong CH, Jeun SS. IL-8 enhances angiogenesis of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells by increasing vascular endothelial growth factor. Cell Biol Int. 2014;38:1050–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. Karashima T, Sweeney P, Kamat A, Huang S, Kim SJ, Bar-Eli M, et al. Nuclear factor-kappaB mediates angiogenesis and metastasis of human bladder cancer through the regulation of interleukin-8. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9:2786–97.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. De Larco JE, Wuertz BR, Rosner KA, Erickson SA, Gamache DE, Manivel JC, et al. A potential role for interleukin-8 in the metastatic phenotype of breast carcinoma cells. Am J Pathol. 2001;158:639–46.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. Singh RK, Gutman M, Reich R, Bar-Eli M. Ultraviolet B irradiation promotes tumorigenic and metastatic properties in primary cutaneous melanoma via induction of interleukin 8. Cancer Res. 1995;55:3669–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. Meeren AV, Bertho JM, Vandamme M, Gaugler MH. Ionizing radiation enhances IL-6 and IL-8 production by human endothelial cells. Mediators Inflamm. 1997;6:185–93.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. Yang Z, Guo L, Liu D, Sun L, Chen H, Deng Q, et al. Acquisition of resistance to trastuzumab in gastric cancer cells is associated with activation of IL-6/STAT3/Jagged-1/Notch positive feedback loop. Oncotarget. 2014; [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
  117. Schafer ZT, Brugge JS. IL-6 involvement in epithelial cancers. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:3660–3.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. Culig Z, Puhr M. Interleukin-6: a multifunctional targetable cytokine in human prostate cancer. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2012;360:52–8.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. Guo Y, Xu F, Lu T, Duan Z, Zhang Z. Interleukin-6 signaling pathway intargeted therapy for cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 2012;38:904–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. Salgado R, Junius S, Benoy I, Van Dam P, Vermeulen P, Van Marck E, et al. Circulating interleukin-6 predicts survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 2003;103:642–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. Dethlefsen C, Højfeldt G, Hojman P. The role of intratumoral and systemic IL-6 in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;138:657–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. Chang Q, Bournazou E, Sansone P, Berishaj M, Gao SP, Daly L, et al. The IL-6/JAK/Stat3 feed-forwardloop drives tumorigenesis and metastasis. Neoplasia. 2013;15:848–62.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. Sepah SC, Bower JE. Positive affect and inflammation during radiation treatment for breast and prostate cancer. Brain Behav Immun. 2009;23:1068–72.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. Paquette B, Therriault H, Wagner JR. Role of interleukin-1β in radiation-enhancement of MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell invasion. Radiat Res. 2013;180:292–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. Katsuno Y, Lamouille S, Derynck R. TGF-β signaling and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cancer progression. Curr Opin Oncol. 2013;25:76–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. Andarawewa KL, Erickson AC, Chou WS, Costes SV, Gascard P, Mott JD, et al. Ionizing radiation predisposes nonmalignant human mammary epithelial cells to undergo transforming growth factor beta induced epithelial to mesenchymal transition. Cancer Res. 2007;67:8662–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. Wang M, Hada M, Huff J, Pluth JM, Anderson J, O'Neill P, et al. Heavy ions can enhance TGFβ mediated epithelial to mesenchymal transition. J Radiat Res. 2012;53:51–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  128. Buck E, Eyzaguirre A, Barr S, Thompson S, Sennello R, Young D, et al. Loss of homotypic cell adhesion byepithelial-mesenchymal transition or mutation limits sensitivity to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition. Mol Cancer Ther. 2007;6:532–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  129. Minafra L, Bravatà V, Forte GI, Cammarata FP, Gilardi MC, Messa C. Gene expression profiling of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in primary breast cancer cell culture. Anticancer Res. 2014;34:2173–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  130. Minafra L, Norata R, Bravatà V, Viola M, Lupo C, Gelfi C, et al. Unmasking epithelial-mesenchymal transition in a breast cancer primary culture: a study report. BMC Res Notes. 2012;5:343.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  131. Zhou YC, Liu JY, Li J, Zhang J, Xu YQ, Zhang HW, et al. Ionizing radiation promotes migration and invasion of cancer cells through transforming growth factor-beta-mediated epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;81:1530–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  132. Vacchelli E, Vitale I, Tartour E, Eggermont A, Sautès-Fridman C, Galon J, et al. Trial watch: anticancer radioimmunotherapy. Oncoimmunology. 2013;2:e25595.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  133. Vanneman M, Dranoff G. Combining immunotherapy and targeted therapies in cancer treatment. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12:237–51.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  134. Weiss JM, Subleski JJ, Wigginton JM, Wiltrout RH. Immunotherapy of cancer by IL-12-based cytokine combinations. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2007;7:1705–21.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. Formenti SC, Demaria S. Combining radiotherapy and cancer immunotherapy: a paradigm shift. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105:256–65.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  136. Begg AC, Stewart FA, Vens C. Strategies to improve radiotherapy with targeted drugs. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11:239–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  137. Magné N, Toillon RA, Bottero V, Didelot C, Houtte PV, Gérard JP, et al. NF-kappaB modulation and ionizing radiation: mechanisms and future directions for cancer treatment. Cancer Lett. 2006;231:158–68.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. Pajonk F, Pajonk K, McBride WH. Apoptosis and radiosensitization of Hodgkin cells by proteasome inhibition. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;47:1025–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  139. Raju U, Gumin GJ, Tofilon PJ. NF kappa B activity and target gene expression in the rat brain after one and two exposures to ionizing radiation. Radiat Oncol Investig. 1999;7:145–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  140. Yang CR, Wilson-Van Patten C, Planchon SM, Wuerzberger-Davis SM, Davis TW, Cuthill S, et al. Coordinate modulation of Sp1, NF-kappa B, andp53 in confluent human malignant melanoma cells after ionizing radiation. FASEB J. 2000;14:379–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  141. Yamagishi N, Miyakoshi J, Takebe H. Enhanced radiosensitivity by inhibition of nuclear factor kappa B activation in human malignant glioma cells. Int J Radiat Biol. 1997;72:157–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  142. Deorukhkar A, Krishnan S, Sethi G, Aggarwal BB. Back to basics: how natural products can provide the basis for new therapeutics. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2007;16:1753–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  143. Singh S, Khar A. Biological effects of curcumin and its role in cancer chemoprevention and therapy. Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2006;6:259–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  144. Hallahan DE, Virudachalam S, Kuchibhotla J, Kufe DW, Weichselbaum RR. Membrane-derived second messenger regulates x-ray-mediated tumor necrosis factor alpha gene induction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91:4897–901.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  145. Linard C, Marquette C, Mathieu J, Pennequin A, Clarençon D, Mathé D. Acute induction of inflammatory cytokine expression after gamma-irradiation in the rat: effect of an NF-kappaB inhibitor. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;58:427–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  146. Turini ME, DuBois RN. Cyclooxygenase-2: a therapeutic target. Annu Rev Med. 2002;53:35–57.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  147. Fitz Gerald GA. COX-2 and beyond: approaches to prostaglandin inhibition inhuman disease. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2003;2:879–90.Google Scholar
  148. Howe LR. Inflammation and breast cancer. Cyclooxygenase/prostaglandin signaling and breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2007;9:210.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  149. Aggarwal BB, Gehlot P. Inflammation and cancer: how friendly is the relationship for cancer patients? Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2009;9:351–69.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  150. Davis TW, Hunter N, Trifan OC, Milas L, Masferrer JL. COX-2 inhibitors as radiosensitizing agents for cancer therapy. Am J Clin Oncol. 2003;26:S58–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  151. Dittmann KH, Mayer C, Ohneseit PA, Raju U, Andratschke NH, Milas L, et al. Celecoxib induced tumor cell radiosensitization by inhibiting radiation induced nuclear EGFR transport and DNA-repair: a COX-2 independent mechanism. IntJ RadiatOncolBiol Phys. 2008;70:203–12.Google Scholar
  152. Grandis JR, Drenning SD, Zeng Q, Watkins SC, Melhem MF, Endo S, et al. Constitutive activation of Stat3 signaling abrogates apoptosis in squamous cell carcinogenesis in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:4227–32.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  153. Konnikova L, Kotecki M, Kruger MM, Cochran BH. Knockdown of STAT3 expression by RNAi induces apoptosis in astrocytoma cells. BMC Cancer. 2003;3:23.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  154. Li WC, Ye SL, Sun RX, Liu YK, Tang ZY, Kim Y, et al. Inhibition of growth and metastasis of human hepatocellular carcinoma by antisense oligonucleotide targeting signal transducer and activator of transcription 3. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:7140–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  155. Zhang X, Zhang J, Wang L, Wei H, Tian Z. Therapeutic effects of STAT3 decoy oligo deoxynucleotide on human lung cancer in xenograft mice. BMC Cancer. 2007;7:149.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  156. Bonner JA, Trummell HQ, Willey CD, Plants BA, Raisch KP. Inhibition of STAT-3 results in radiosensitization of human squamous cell carcinoma. Radiother Oncol. 2009;92:339–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  157. Zhan JF, Chen LH, Yuan YW, Xie GZ, Sun AM, Liu Y, et al. STAT1 promotes radioresistance of CD44 (+)/CD24 (−/low) cells in breast cancer. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2011;236:418–22.Google Scholar
  158. Hosseinimehr SJ. The use of angiotensin II receptor antagonists to increase the efficacy of radiotherapy in cancer treatment. Future Oncol. 2014;10(15):2381–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  159. Salem K, Brown CO, Schibler J, Goel A. Combination chemotherapy increases cytotoxicity of multiple myeloma cells by modification of nuclear factor (NF)-κB activity. Exp Hematol. 2013;41:209–18.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  160. Levy A, Chargari C, Cheminant M, Simon N, Bourgier C, Deutsch E. Radiation therapy and immunotherapy: implications for a combined cancer treatment. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2013;85:278–87.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  161. Orecchia R, Leonardo MC. Intraoperative radiation therapy: is it a standard now? Breast. 2011;20:S111–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  162. Wallner P, Arthur D, Bartelink H, Connolly J, Edmundson G, Giuliano A, et al. Workshop Participants. Workshop on partial breast irradiation: state of the art and the science. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:175–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  163. Smith BD, Arthur DW, Buchholz TA, Haffty BG, Hahn CA, Hardenbergh PH, et al. Accelerated partial breast irradiation consensus statement from the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;74:987–1001.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  164. Veronesi U, Orecchia R, Luini A, Galimberti V, Zurrida S, Intra M, et al. Intraoperative radiotherapy during breast conserving surgery: a study on 1,822 cases treated with electrons. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;124:141–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  165. Veronesi U, Orecchia R, Maisonneuve P, Viale G, Rotmensz N, Sangalli C, et al. Intraoperative radiotherapy versus external radiotherapy for early breast cancer (ELIOT): a randomised controlled equivalence trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:1269–77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  166. Herskind C, Wenz F. Radiobiological aspects of intraoperative tumour-bed irradiation with low-energy X-rays (LEX-IORT). Transl Cancer Res. 2014;3:3–17.Google Scholar
  167. Kobari M, Egawa S, Shibuya K, Sunamura M, Saitoh K, Matsuno S. Effect of intraportal adoptive immunotherapy on liver metastases after resection of pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg. 2000;87(1):43–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Di Maggio et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement