Skip to content

Advertisement

Journal of Inflammation

  • Research
  • Open Access

Areca nut chewing and systemic inflammation: evidence of a common pathway for systemic diseases

  • Kashif Shafique1Email author,
  • Saira Saeed Mirza†2,
  • Priya Vart3,
  • Abdul Rauf Memon4,
  • Moin Islam Arain5,
  • Muhammad Farooq Tareen6 and
  • Zia Ul Haq1
†Contributed equally
Journal of Inflammation20129:22

https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-9255-9-22

©  Shafique et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

Received: 2 January 2012

Accepted: 24 May 2012

Published: 7 June 2012

Abstract

Background

Areca nut, the seed of fruit of an oriental palm, known as Areca catechu, is commonly chewed in many countries. Diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular diseases, oropharyngeal and oesophageal cancers have been associated with areca nut chewing and the mechanism by which areca nut chewing increases the risk of systemic diseases remains elusive. We hypothesize that systemic inflammation may be elevated among areca nut users, which is linked with many systemic diseases. Therefore, this present study was conducted to examine the systemic inflammation among areca nut chewers and healthy controls.

Methods

This was an observational cross sectional study carried out on areca nut chewers and healthy individuals in Karachi, Pakistan. Participants were selected from a region of the city by invitation request sent from door to door. Information was collected regarding the socio-demographic profile and the pattern of use, and a blood sample was obtained to measure the level of C-reactive protein (CRP). We carried out multiple logistic regressions to investigate the association between socio-demographic profile, areca nut chewing and CRP levels.

Results

We carried out final analysis on 1112 individuals of which 556 were areca nut chewers and 556 were the age, gender and area matched controls. Areca nut chewers had a significantly higher proportion of men (15.1%, n = 84) who had an elevated CRP (>10 mg/dl) as compared to controls (5.2%, n = 29). Multivariate analyses showed that areca nut chewers had significantly higher odds of an elevated CRP (OR = 3.23, 95% CI 2.08-5.02, p value <0.001) as compared to controls. Increase in amount of areca nut consumption had a significant dose–response relationship with systemic inflammation (p for trend <0.001). Further analysis revealed that areca nut chewers with tobacco additives were two times more likely to have an elevated CRP as compared to raw areca nut users. These associations remained unchanged after adjustments for age, BMI and years of full time education.

Conclusions

Areca nut chewing has a significant association with systemic inflammation. Further work is required to confirm that systemic inflammation is the main pathway by which areca nut use increases the risk of systemic diseases.

Keywords

Systemic inflammationAreca nutCancersCardiovascular diseases

Background

Areca nut is the seed of the fruit of a tropical palm tree, Areca Catechu. This tree bears fruit throughout the year and areca nut is obtained from it, which is a basic ingredient of widely used chewing products [1]. Slices of areca are used fresh or dried and occasionally cured before use by boiling, baking or roasting. These nuts are chewed either in raw form or mixed with a variety of substances including slaked lime (aqueous calcium hydroxide paste), artificial sweeteners, spices such as cardamom, coconut, saffron and most significantly, these nuts are also mixed with some tobacco products [2, 3].

Areca nut is considered to be the fourth most commonly used psychoactive substance after tobacco, alcohol and caffeine and more than 10% of the World’s population chew it regularly more commonly in Central, Southern and South-east Asian countries [4]. Interestingly, the number of areca chewers has remarkably increased in Australia, United Kingdom, Europe and USA especially among the immigrants settling in these countries from the developing world [1]. Prevalence of areca nut chewer varies in different regions of the world with a higher prevalence in developing countries and lower in the developed part of the world [1].

Substantial body of evidence now suggests that areca nut chewing is associated with benign and malignant diseases of the oral cavity. WHO International Agency for Research on Cancer Monograph Working Group (2009) highlighed that the evidence on areca nut and its assosciation with oral, pharyngeal and esophageal cancer is sufficient to establish a causal link [5]. Interestingly, hepatocellular carcinoma, for which hepatitis B and C infections are considered as major risk factors, has been found commonly among areca nut chewers who were free from hepatitis B/C infections [6]. There is also growing evidence that areca nut chewing is associated with many systemic diseases including obesity [7, 8] diabetes mellitus [9, 10], hypertension [10] and metabolic syndrome [11]. Furthermore, areca nut chewing also increases the risk of cardiovascular diseases and ultimately increases all-cause mortality independent of traditional risk factors of these conditions [12, 13].

Although, evidence suggests that areca nut chewing increases the risk of many systemic diseases, the underlying biological mechanisms of these associations remain elusive and little has been known and published in this area. There is compelling evidence that the alkaloids of areca nut have a vital role in the initiation and progression of oral and pharyngeal lesions by initiating local inflammation but there is no evidence as such that systemic inflammation has some role in the development of systemic and metabolic diseases among areca nut chewers. We hypothesize that systemic inflammation could be a main pathway by which areca nut consumption increases the risks of systemic diseases. Therefore, the present study was conducted to examine the systemic inflammation among areca nut chewers in comparison to the general population.

Methods

Cohort selection

We included healthy individuals from population for this study who were invited to outdoor patients department of Civil Hospital Karachi, Pakistan. The details of areca nut chewers and their selection have been described elsewhere [14]. In brief, all willing healthy male individuals between the ages of 16 to 35 who visited the outdoor patient department during January 2009 to December 2010 in response to the invitation were included in this study. Apparently healthy men who were chewers of areca products (i.e. Areca nut only or Areca nut with tobacco additives) were included in this study as cases. We prepared a list of 50 areca nut products commonly available in the market, so that individuals can be classified in groups accurately. Individuals who visited the specially setup clinic in out patient department for participation in this study and had current illness or wanted to had a follow up of a previous illness were not included in this study. Individuals who refused to participate in the survey or were unable to understand Urdu (national language of Pakistan) were also excluded from this survey.

Information about the basic demography and substance use was collected by using a questionnaire. This was a 20-items questionnaire including the information about socio-demographic profile (including age, years of education, nature of job/study), pattern of substance use (frequency, number of years of usage, daily consumption, type of substance and family history of use). This questionnaire was assessed for comprehensiveness, relevance and clarity by three health professionals. Based on their comments and suggestions some items were modified while five items were excluded. This was then piloted on 50 participants. The performance of the questionnaire was assessed by validity and reliability analysis which showed a fairly high validity and reliability with a Cronbach’s alpha for the studied sample as 0.90.

Men who responded to the invitation, who never chewed areca products, smoked cigarettes or used any other addictive substance were included in this study as controls. Furthermore, potential participants from community were also approached by local political leaders and key informants. Information about this particular study was also conveyed in community in different social gatherings to increase the community participation in this study. Controls were selected based on age, gender and area matched to cases. Any individual who came to participate in the study and had a self-reported history of any acute (acute febrile illnesses i.e. upper and lower respiratory tract and gastro-intestinal infections) or chronic illness (e.g. hypertension, diabetes mellitus, arthritis, asthma, COPD) were excluded from this study. Participants were examined by a dentist at recruitment site and those who had periodontal diseases were also excluded from this study. An additional questionnaire including the dietary as well as lifestyle habbits was also filled by an interviewing physician or nurse. General physical examination was conducted for all participants including the anthropometric measurements following a standard procedure of removing the shoes for height and weight measurements. A single page information sheet was designed to convey the aims and objectives of the study to the participants and a verbal consent was obtained prior to employing the questionnaire. A blood sample was obtained to measure the level of circulating C-reactive protein and other haematological profile of the participants. All blood samples were collected in serum-separating tubes containing anticoagulant in it. These samples were then processed to a biochemistry laboratory where they were analysed for CRP using Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The Novex manufactured 96-well microplate reader and CRP human ELISA kits were used for this analysis. This study was approved by the hospital authorities and an independent ethical committee also reviewed and approved the study protocol.

Sample size estimation

We estimated the sample size to measure 6% difference of dependency prevalence (assuming 20% prevalence of systemic inflammation among areca users) between groups at 0.05 significance level using two sided comparison and power of 80%. Sample size was computed for both the X 2 using the Yates’ continuity correction and Fisher Exact test. A sample of 938 participants was the minimum number required to be accrued to perform this survey with an allocation ratio of 1.

Data analysis

We used Stata software version 11 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA) to analyze the collected information. Participants were divided into two groups according to their substance consumption (“areca nut chewers” and “controls”). Age was categorised into five years age bands (age years 16–20,21-25,26-30 and 31–35) and education into three categories <10 years, 10–12 years and >12 years. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated from weight (in kg) divided by height (in metres) squared and categorised according to the World Health Organisation (WHO) Asian population specific classification in which BMI <18.5 is underweight, <23 is desirable, 23–27.5 is overweight and >27.5 is classified as obese [15]. In our sample only two individuals had BMI less than 18.5 so we combined the underweight category with desirable group. C-reactive protein was dichotomised; those who had a CRP less than or equal to 10 mg/dl and CRP greater than 10, a cut off which has been consistently used in many studies to assess the systemic inflammation [16, 17]. We used multiple logistic regression adding different explanatory variables to assess the association between areca nut use and systemic inflammation. We also investigated the interaction between different variables included in the multivariate model.

Results

A total of 1112 men were included in this study, 556 areca chewers and 556 healthy controls. Mean age of participants was 25.6 ± 5.6 years with no statistically significant difference between cases and controls (p value = 0.73). Mean BMI of the sample was 25.8 ± 4.0 kg/m2, no significant difference was observed between cases and controls (p value 0.17). Significant differences were observed in years of full time education between cases and controls; controls were significantly more likely to be less educated as compared to cases (p value 0.001). Baseline distribution of sample is summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of areca nut chewers and controls

Characteristics

Number (n)

Areca nut chewers, n (%)

Controls, n (%)

p value

Study participants (n)

1112

556

556

 

Age at screening, mean (SD)

1112

25.6 (5.6)

25.7 (5.6)

0.734

Age at screening (years)

   

0.641

Age 16-20

203

98 (17.6)

105 (18.9)

 

Age 21-25

425

211 (38.0)

214 (38.5)

 

Age 26-30

237

127 (22.8)

110 (19.8)

 

Age 31-35

247

120 (21.6)

127 (22.8)

 

Body Mass Index, mean (SD)

1112

25.7 (4.0)

26.0 (4.2)

0.166

Body Mass Index (kg/m2)

   

0.492

Desirable < 23

317

162 (29.1)

155 (27.9)

 

Overweight 23–27.5

473

242 (43.5)

231 (41.6)

 

Obese > 27.5

322

152 (27.3)

170 (30.6)

 

Education (years)

   

< 0.001

< 10 years

167

66 (11.9)

101 (18.2)

 

10 - 12 years

497

278 (50.0)

219 (39.4)

 

> 12 years

448

212 (38.1)

236 (42.5)

 

C - reactive protein (mg/dl), mean (SD)

1112

6.1 (3.8)

3.5 (3.6)

< 0.001

Inflammation

   

< 0.001

Absent (CRP ≤ 10 mg/dl)

999

472 (84.9)

527 (94.8)

 

Present (CRP > 10 mg/dl)

113

84 (15.1)

29 (5.2)

 
The mean CRP level significantly differed (mean difference 2.59, p-value <0.01) between cases and controls with higher level among cases (6.11 ± 3.8) compared with controls (3.53 ± 3.6). The proportion of men who had an elevated level of CRP (CRP >10 mg/dl) also significantly differed between cases and controls, where 15.1% (n = 84) areca nut chewers had an elevated CRP compared to 5.2% (n = 29) controls. On logistic regression analysis, there was no significant difference in likelihood of elevated CRP between age, BMI and education categories. However, areca nut chewers had 3 times higher odds of having an elevated CRP as compared to controls (OR 3.23, 95% CI 2.08-5.02, p value < 0.001). This association remained significant and slightly strengthened after adjusting for age, BMI and years of education (Table 2).
Table 2

Systemic inflammation and role of areca nut chewing, a comparison with healthy controls

 

Univariate analysis

Multivariate analysis

 

Odds ratio (95% CI)

Wald Chi2

p value

Odds ratio (95% CI)

Wald Chi2

p value

Age at screening (years)

Age 16-20

1

  

1

  

Age 21-25

0.83 (0.48 - 1.44)

−0.66

0.51

0.79 (0.44 - 1.40)

−0.81

0.42

Age 26-30

0.97 (0.53 - 1.78)

−0.10

0.92

0.89 (0.47 - 1.66)

−0.37

0.71

Age 31-35

1.01 (0.56 - 1.83)

0.03

0.98

0.99 (0.54 - 1.83)

−0.02

0.99

BMI (kg/m2)

Desirable < 23

1

  

1

  

Overweight 23–27.5

0.90 (0.56 - 1.45)

−0.41

0.68

0.91 (0.56 - 1.47)

−0.38

0.71

Obese > 27.5

1.05 (0.63 - 1.74)

0.19

0.85

1.11 (0.66 - 1.85)

0.39

0.7

Education (years)

< 10 years

1

  

1

  

10 - 12 years

1.18 (0.65 - 2.16)

0.55

0.58

0.94 (0.51 - 1.76)

−0.18

0.86

> 12 years

1.16 (0.63 - 2.14)

0.47

0.64

1.07 (0.57 - 2.01)

0.22

0.83

Group

Control

1

  

1

  

Areca nut chewers

3.23 (2.08 - 5.02)

5.23

< 0.001

3.30 (2.11 - 5.15)

5.26

< 0.001

Multivariate model included all the co-variates listed in the table.

The mean CRP level significantly differed (mean difference 1.89, p-value <0.01) between raw areca nut chewers and areca nut chewers with tobacco additives with higher level among areca nut chewers with tobacco additives (7.18 ± 3.95) compared with raw areca nut chewers (5.29 ± 3.44). The proportion of men with an elevated CRP significantly differed between raw areca nut chewers (12.1%, n = 38) and areca chewers with tobacco additives (19.0%, n = 46). On sub-group analysis, the controls were excluded from the analysis and likelihood of elevated CRP was compared between raw areca nut users and areca chewers with tobacco additives. Men who used areca nut with tobacco additives were two times more likely to have a higher CRP as compared to raw areca nut users (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.16-3.31, p value 0.009) after adjusting for age, BMI and years of education (Table 3). Increase in amount of areca nut consumption also showed a significant (p for trend <0.01) dose–response relationship with systemic inflammation (Figure 1).
Table 3

Systemic inflammation and areca nut chewing with tobacco additives, a comparison with raw areca nut chewers

 

Univariate analysis

Multivariate analysis

 

Odds ratio (95% CI)

Wald chi2

p value

Odds ratio (95% CI)

Wald chi2

p value

Age at screening (years)

Age 16-20

1

  

1

  

Age 21-25

0.83 (0.48 - 1.44)

−0.66

0.51

1.03 (0.51 - 2.11)

0.09

0.93

Age 26-30

0.97 (0.53 - 1.78)

−0.10

0.92

1.13 (0.52 - 2.43)

0.30

0.76

Age 31-35

1.01 (0.56 - 1.83)

0.03

0.98

0.57 (0.26 - 1.24)

−1.41

0.16

Age at screening (continuous)

0.98 (0.94 - 1.02)

−1.14

0.25

0.97 (0.93 - 1.01)

−1.28

0.20

BMI (kg/m2)

Desirable < 23

1

  

1

  

Overweight 23–27.5

0.90 (0.56 - 1.45)

−0.41

0.68

0.80 (0.45 - 1.43)

−0.75

0.46

Obese > 27.5

1.05 (0.63 - 1.74)

0.19

0.85

1.08 (0.59 - 1.98)

0.24

0.81

Education (years)

< 10 years

1

  

1

  

10 - 12 years

1.18 (0.65 - 2.16)

0.55

0.58

1.67 (0.73 - 3.82)

1.22

0.22

> 12 years

1.16 (0.63 - 2.14)

0.47

0.64

1.26 (0.55 - 2.87)

0.55

0.58

Group

Raw areca nut chewers

1

  

1

  

Areca with tobacco additives

1.70 (1.07 - 2.72)

2.24

0.03

1.98 (1.16 - 3.31)

2.61

0.009

Multivariate model included all the co-variates listed in the table.

Figure 1
Figure 1

The dose–response relationship between systemic inflammation and areca nut chewing. Adjusted odds ratio calculated from a multivariate model adjusted for age, BMI and years of full time education.

On interaction analysis, we did not find any significant interaction (p-value for interaction 0.33) between BMI and age of areca nut chewers in relation to systemic inflammation. However further age and BMI stratified analysis was carried out to control for any residual confounding. On age-specific analysis, areca nut chewers had significantly higher odds of having an elevated CRP as compared to controls except among subjects aged 16–20 years (Figure 1). On BMI stratified analyses, all areca nut chewers had significantly higher odds of having an elevated CRP with highest effect in the obese group (Figure 2).
Figure 2
Figure 2

Age and BMI specific risk of systemic inflammation among areca nut chewers as compared to controls. A = BMI stratified analysis, B = Age-specific analysis. Adjusted odds ratio calculated from a multivariate model adjusted for age and years of full time education.

Discussion

The findings of the present study indicate that areca nut chewing is significantly associated with systemic inflammation as measured by CRP. The results suggest that areca nut chewing has a direct relationship with CRP independent of age, BMI and educational level. As expected, the users of areca nut with tobacco additives had even higher levels of CRP as compared to raw areca nut chewers. Moreover, areca nut chewing has a significant relationship with elevated CRP either measured as a continuous or categorical variable.

The major constituents of areca nut are carbohydrates, lipids, proteins, alkaloids and polyphenols[18]. There is preliminary evidence from in vivo data, that areca nut extracts augment the inflammatory response as well as the expression of tumor necrosis factor-alpha in mice models [19]. Extracts of both ripe areca nut and extracts of tender areca nut significantly enhanced the production of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-1beta in peripheral blood mononuclear cells in a dose-dependent and time-dependent manner [20]. To the best of our knowledge, our findings provide the first evidence which shows the relationship of areca nut chewing and systemic inflammation measured by CRP in humans. The results of this study are biologically plausible, as areca nut consumption has been associated with the risk of developing diabetes mellitus, hypertension, cardiovascular diseases and cancers [8, 11, 13, 21]. On the other hand, compelling evidence has shown that inflammation is a primary aetiological factor in development of hypertension [22, 23], cardiovascular diseases [24, 25] and cancers [26, 27]. Taken together, areca nut might be increasing the risk of cardiovascular diseases and cancers by augmenting the systemic inflammatory response and elevating the levels of circulating inflammatory markers. Regular high consumption of areca nuts for longer duration may cause chronic inflammation, locally in oral cavity and systemically, which could lead to multiple diseases.

Our results may have been influenced by the tobacco components of areca nuts, but stratified analysis also showed the higher odds of systemic inflammation among raw areca nut chewers compared to healthy controls (data not shown). The confounding effect of age and obesity on systemic inflammation may have biased our results, although, the positive (harmful) association of areca nut chewing and systemic inflammation remained significant after adjustments for age and BMI, we also stratified the analysis based on age and BMI categories to remove the residual confounding due to these factors. The overall associations remain significant in stratified analysis except among the younger age group (age 16–20 years). The null association of areca nut chewing and systemic inflammation among younger participants could be explained by many factors including, less consumption of the nut or smaller duration since the beginning of the use. Furthermore, younger individuals tend to be physically active while participating in outdoor sports or leisure activities; exercise and physical activity has an inverse relationship with inflammation, reported by many studies [28, 29]. So the harmful effect of areca nut chewing may actually be attenuated by some other unknown lifestyle factors resulting in a null finding in the younger age group, which we have reported.

The major strength of this cross sectional study was that it was population-based and we had a fairly large sample to examine associations between areca nut chewing and systemic inflammation. Although, our findings suggest that areca nut chewing has a strong relationship with systemic inflammation and hence may have a role in the development of systemic diseases at a later stage but causality can not be established in a cross-sectional study. The contribution of areca nut chewing in development of chronic diseases, should, therefore be assessed by larger prospective studies in relation to systemic inflammation.

This study has several limitations which need to be mentioned. As the participants were selected from one region of this city, so given the sample limitations one can not draw conclusions about the population level estimates from this study. We used only male individuals; therefore, it is difficult to assume that the prevalence of systemic inflammation would also be similar among the female population in this country. Indeed it may be even higher compared to males, as an earlier study from Taiwan suggested that the risk of hypertension was significantly higher among female areca nut chewers as compared to males [10]. Most of the individuals included in our study were from average or below average socio-economic class, so the results are not generalisable to all the social classes of this country.

Public health implications

Areca nut use poses significant and avoidable morbidity and mortality. The present finding suggests a possible mechanism by which areca nut chewing is related with chronic diseases. Confirmation of causality between areca nut use and systemic inflammation and then further development of chronic disease would enhance the significance of primary prevention programs. Health education and awareness are perhaps the most crucial interventions required to be delivered so that the adverse effects of the substance can be appreciated by the community. Addressing a culturally sanctioned substance in terms of addiction and harm may meet with considerable resistance, especially if attention resulted in compromised supply or increased cost [30]. These interventions need to be focused on all age groups, particularly in early age school children to avoid future morbidity and mortality associated with this substance.

Conclusions

Areca nut chewing was significantly associated with systemic inflammation. Systemic inflammation was significantly higher among men using areca nuts with tobacco additives. Further evidence is required to confirm the findings and its relationship with development of cardiovascular diseases and cancers.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgement

We are grateful to Health and Education Promotion Society for providing support and financial assistance to carry out the haematological and biochemical investigations.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of Health & Wellbeing, Public Health, 1-Lilybank Gardens, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
(2)
Department of Physiology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
(3)
Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
(4)
Department of Medicine, Civil Hospital Karachi, Karachi, Pakistan
(5)
Department of Medicine, Isra Medical University, Hyderabad, Pakistan
(6)
Department of Health, Government of Balochistan, Quetta, Pakistan

References

  1. Gupta PC, Ray CS: Epidemiology of betel quid usage. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2004, 33: 31-36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Blank M, Deshpande L, Balster RL: Availability and characteristics of betel products in the U.S. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs. 2008, 40: 309-313. 10.1080/02791072.2008.10400646.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Rozi S, Akhtar S: Prevalence and predictors of smokeless tobacco use among high-school males in Karachi, Pakistan. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal. 2007, 13: 916-924.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Boucher BJ: Paan without tobacco: an independent risk factor for oral cancer. Int J Cancer. 2001, 91: 592-593. 10.1002/1097-0215(200002)9999:9999<::AID-IJC1085>3.0.CO;2-K.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Secretan B, Straif K, Baan R, Grosse Y, El GF, Bouvard V: A review of human carcinogens–Part E: tobacco, areca nut, alcohol, coal smoke, and salted fish. Lancet Oncology. 2009, 10: 1033-1034. 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70326-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Wu GH, Boucher BJ, Chiu YH, Liao CS, Chen TH: Impact of chewing betel-nut (Areca catechu) on liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma: a population-based study from an area with a high prevalence of hepatitis B and C infections. Public Health Nutr. 2009, 12: 129-135. 10.1017/S1368980008002073.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Boucher BJ, Mannan N: Metabolic effects of the consumption of Areca catechu. Addict Biol. 2002, 7: 103-110. 10.1080/13556210120091464.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Javed F, Bello Correra FO, Chotai M, Tappuni AR, Almas K: Systemic conditions associated with areca nut usage: a literature review. Scand J Public Health. 2010, 38: 838-844. 10.1177/1403494810379291.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Benjamin AL: Community screening for diabetes in the National Capital District, Papua New Guinea: is betelnut chewing a risk factor for diabetes?. P N G Med J. 2001, 44: 101-107.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Tseng CH: Betel nut chewing is associated with hypertension in Taiwanese type 2 diabetic patients. Hypertens Res. 2008, 31: 417-423. 10.1291/hypres.31.417.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Yen AM, Chiu YH, Chen LS, Wu HM, Huang CC, Boucher BJ: A population-based study of the association between betel-quid chewing and the metabolic syndrome in men. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006, 83: 1153-1160.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Lan TY, Chang WC, Tsai YJ, Chuang YL, Lin HS, Tai TY: Areca nut chewing and mortality in an elderly cohort study. Am J Epidemiol. 2007, 165: 677-683. 10.1093/aje/kwk056.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Lin WY, Chiu TY, Lee LT, Lin CC, Huang CY, Huang KC: Betel nut chewing is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality in Taiwanese men. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008, 87: 1204-1211.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Mirza SS, Shafique K, Vart P, Arain MI: Areca nut chewing and dependency syndrome: is the dependence comparable to smoking? a cross sectional study. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2011, 6: 23-10.1186/1747-597X-6-23.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. World Health Organization (2000) The Asia-Pacific perspective: redefining obesity and its treatment. 2000, WHO Geneva, Sydney, Australia,http://www.wpro.who.int/internet/resourcesashx/NUT/Redefining+obesity.pdf,Google Scholar
  16. McMillan DC, Crozier JE, Canna K, Angerson WJ, McArdle CS: Evaluation of an inflammation-based prognostic score (GPS) in patients undergoing resection for colon and rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007, 22: 881-886. 10.1007/s00384-006-0259-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ramsey S, Lamb GW, Aitchison M, Graham J, McMillan DC: Evaluation of an inflammation-based prognostic score in patients with metastatic renal cancer. Cancer. 2007, 109: 205-212. 10.1002/cncr.22400.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lord GA, Lim CK, Warnakulasuriya S, Peters TJ: Chemical and analytical aspects of areca nut. Addict Biol. 2002, 7: 99-102. 10.1080/13556210120091455.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Wang CC, Lin HL, Wey SP, Jan TR: Areca-nut extract modulates antigen-specific immunity and augments inflammation in ovalbumin-sensitized mice. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 2011, 33: 315-322. 10.3109/08923973.2010.507208.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Chang LY, Wan HC, Lai YL, Kuo YF, Liu TY, Chen YT: Areca nut extracts increased expression of inflammatory cytokines, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-1beta, interleukin-6 and interleukin-8, in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. J Periodontal Res. 2009, 44: 175-183. 10.1111/j.1600-0765.2008.01104.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Wu MT, Wu DC, Hsu HK, Kao EL, Lee JM: Constituents of areca chewing related to esophageal cancer risk in Taiwanese men. Dis Esophagus. 2004, 17: 257-259. 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2004.00419.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Bautista LE, Lopez-Jaramillo P, Vera LM, Casas JP, Otero AP, Guaracao AI: Is C-reactive protein an independent risk factor for essential hypertension?. J Hypertens. 2001, 19: 857-861. 10.1097/00004872-200105000-00004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Sesso HD, Buring JE, Rifai N, Blake GJ, Gaziano JM, Ridker PM: C-reactive protein and the risk of developing hypertension. JAMA. 2003, 290: 2945-2951. 10.1001/jama.290.22.2945.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Fedele S, Sabbah W, Donos N, Porter S, D'Aiuto F: Common oral mucosal diseases, systemic inflammation, and cardiovascular diseases in a large cross-sectional US survey. Am Heart J. 2011, 161: 344-350. 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.11.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Wijnstok NJ, Twisk JW, Young IS, Woodside JV, McFarlane C, McEneny J: Inflammation markers are associated with cardiovascular diseases risk in adolescents: the Young Hearts project 2000. J Adolesc Health. 2010, 47: 346-351. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.04.008.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Grange JM, Krone B, Mastrangelo G: Infection, inflammation and cancer. Int J Cancer. 2011, 128: 2240-2241. 10.1002/ijc.25533.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Grivennikov SI, Greten FR, Karin M: Immunity, inflammation, and cancer. Cell. 2010, 140: 883-899. 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.025.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Warnberg J, Cunningham K, Romeo J, Marcos A: Physical activity, exercise and low-grade systemic inflammation. Proc Nutr Soc. 2010, 69: 400-406. 10.1017/S0029665110001928.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kelly AS, Wetzsteon RJ, Kaiser DR, Steinberger J, Bank AJ, Dengel DR: Inflammation, insulin, and endothelial function in overweight children and adolescents: the role of exercise. J Pediatr. 2004, 145: 731-736. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.08.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Winstock A: Areca nut-abuse liability, dependence and public health. Addict Biol. 2002, 7: 133-138. 10.1080/13556210120091509.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Shafique et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement

Journal of Inflammation

ISSN: 1476-9255

Contact us