Open Access

The effect of the CCR5-delta32 deletion on global gene expression considering immune response and inflammation

  • Gero Hütter1Email author,
  • Martin Neumann2,
  • Daniel Nowak3,
  • Stefan Klein3,
  • Harald Klüter1 and
  • Wolf-K Hofmann3
Journal of Inflammation20118:29

https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-9255-8-29

Received: 30 June 2011

Accepted: 26 October 2011

Published: 26 October 2011

Abstract

Background

The natural function of the C-C chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5) is poorly understood. A 32 base pair deletion in the CCR5 gene (CCR5-delta32) located on chromosome 3 results in a non-functional protein. It is supposed that this deletion causes an alteration in T-cell response to inflammation. For example, the presence of the CCR5-delta32 allele in recipients of allografts constitutes as an independent and protective factor associated with a decreased risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and graft rejection. However, the mechanism of this beneficial effect of the deletion regarding GVHD is unknown. In this survey we searched for a CCR5-delta32 associated regulation of critical genes involved in the immune response and the development of GVHD.

Methods

We examined CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells derived from bone marrow samples from 19 healthy volunteers for the CCR5-delta32 deletion with a genomic PCR using primers flanking the site of the deletion.

Results

12 individuals were found to be homozygous for CCR5 WT and 7 carried the CCR5-delta32 deletion heterozygously. Global gene expression analysis led to the identification of 11 differentially regulated genes. Six of them are connected with mechanisms of immune response and control: LRG1, CXCR2, CCRL2, CD6, CD7, WD repeat domain, and CD30L.

Conclusions

Our data indicate that the CCR5-delta32 mutation may be associated with differential gene expression. Some of these genes are critical for immune response, in the case of CD30L probably protective in terms of GVHD.

Keywords

Chemokine CCR5-delat32 Graft versus host disease transplantation

Background

The C-C chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5) belongs to the super family of the seven-transmembrane G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) [1]. It interacts with chemokines that mediate the trafficking and function of memory/effector T-lymphocytes, macrophages, and immature dendritic cells towards sites of inflammation [2]. When bound by their chemokine ligands, these receptors can be internalized, impairing the subsequent ability to bind their ligands. Once internalized, these receptors tend to recycle to the cell surface in time. Most chemokines activate more than one receptor subtype and like other chemokine receptors, CCR5 can bind several chemokines [3]. After activation with small ligands, GPCRs are rapidly phosphorylated at serine and threonine residues within the C-tail and the third intracellular loop [4].

CCR5 has gained prominence as a cofactor for HIV-1 entry. Hence, 74 mutations have been described in this gene up to date including the intensively studied 32 base pair deletion (CCR5-delta32) that introduces a premature stop-codon into the CCR5 locus [57]. Epidemiologic studies have shown that the mutation occurs most frequently in the Caucasian population with up to 10-20% heterozygous and 1% homozygous carriers, while it can not be found in the Asian, Middle East, African, and the American Indian population [8]. It is hypothesized that the imbalanced distribution of this allele was caused by environmental selective pressure, resulting in positive selection for the delta32 deletion [9]. Individuals lacking CCR5 display no remarkable illness and, no increased susceptibility towards infectious diseases could be observed until Lim et al. figured out a possible role for CCR5 during infection with the West Nile virus (WNV) [10].

Over the last decade, a large number of reports focusing on the role of chemokines in the context of allograft rejection have been made [11]. Furthermore, the first CCR5 inhibitors have been tested concerning their therapeutic significance in terms of transplantation immunology [12, 13]. First clinical data will probably be available soon from a trial introducing the CCR5 inhibitor Maraviroc® into allogeneic hematpoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) from the Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania (NIH clinical trial number: NCT00948753).

The CCR5 gene is mapped to the short arm of chromosome 3 amongst a group of genes that encode multiple chemokine receptors [14]. CCR5 up-regulation has been proposed by NF-κB, but recently it was suggested that gene regulation is modified by the cAMP/CREP pathway [15, 16]. The effect of the CCR5-delta32 deletion on the expression on other genes has been intensively investigated for CXCR4 [17]. The aberrant gene product from CCR5-delta32 builds an intracellular complex with the CXCR4 receptor preventing the expression on the cell surface. Although the mechanism is well described there is a controversy on the question whether this complex is sufficient to suppress CXCR4. Furthermore, it is unknown whether the deletion influences the expression of other genes or forms complexes with a second or third protein.

Apart from the role in HIV infection, the CCR5-delta32 mutation seems to be a modulator regarding immune responses and transplantation immunology. There has also been proposed an association of the mutation with the occurrence of allograft rejection and protection against graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) [18, 19].

For HSCT, testing for at least five HLA genes is required before declaring that donor and recipient are HLA-concordant. However, GVHD can occur even though donor and recipient are HLA-concordant as the immune system is still able to recognize other differences in antigenicity and recipients need intensive immunosuppressive medication to prevent the development of GVHD [20, 21]. Although there are advances in the treatment of GVHD, this inflammatory immunoreaction is still responsible for 15% of treatment related mortality [22]. Therefore, understanding and manipulating the mechanisms of GVHD is of important scientific and clinical impact.

Chemokines play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of GVHD after allogeneic HSCT. In experimental models, due to the redundancy of receptor ligand interaction, the deficiency or blockage of a single chemokine does not protect the allograft from acute rejection [18]. However, recent studies have demonstrated that the blockade or absence of a single chemokine receptor does prolong allograft survival in a fully HLA mismatched model [23].

However, the molecular basis of the protective effect of CCR5-delta32 is poorly understood. It is still unclear, whether the CCR5-delta32 deletion may have an effect on the expression of genes, which communicate immunological responses or whether the protective effect of the CCR5-delta32 deletion is solely caused by the lack of functional CCR5. One of the most elaborately investigated but also controversially discussed association of the CCR5-delta32 deletion is the putative suppression of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 [17]. With concern to this, there is only data available from an animal model, in which CCR5 has been blocked by specific inhibitors [24, 25].

To investigate the molecular basis of the CCR5-delta32 deletion in terms of the biology of immune responses, we performed an array based global analysis of gene expression in CD34+ hematopoietic progenitors from healthy individuals either wild type for CCR5 or heterozygous carriers of the CCR5-delta32 deletion.

Some functional or evolutionary related genes are closely localized in gene clusters. There is a rising count of deletions in other genes described where not only the deletion but also deletion associated down-stream alterations of clustered genes are affected [26, 27]. Chemokine and chemokine receptor genes are also known to be clustered in the human genome. Most CC-chemokine receptor genes like CCR5 have been shown to map within 3p21.3, while CXC-chemokine receptor genes were mapped with few exceptions to 2q35 [28]. The clustering of chemokine and chemokine receptor genes suggests a relatively recent and rapid evolution of both gene families by genomic duplications [29]. To detect a potential effect of the deletion on co-regulated or clustered genes, only genes meeting one of two criteria: 1. role in immune response or GVHD or 2. located on chromosome 3, have been selected for further statistical analysis.

Materials and methods

Material

Input material for this analysis were immunomagnetically purified CD34+ cells from bone marrow aspiration of 19 healthy volunteers, 9 male 10 female, aged 19-85 (median 25) years. All donors gave written informed consent before investigation. Prior to CD34+ selection, mononuclear cells were isolated by density gradient centrifugation through Ficoll-Hypaque (Biochrom, Berlin, Germany).

CCR5 genotyping analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted from heparinised peripheral blood monocytes (PBMC) of the donors with the QIAGEN-Blood-Midi-Kit (Qiagen, Germany). Screening of the donors for the CCR5-delta32-allele was performed with a genomic PCR using primers flanking the site of the deletion (forward: 5'-CTCCCAGGAATCATCTTTACC-3', reverse: 5'-TCATTTCGACACCGAAGCAG-3') leading to a PCR fragment of 200 base pairs (bp) for the CCR5-allele and of 168 bp in case of a delta32 deletion. Results were confirmed by allele specific PCR and by direct sequencing using the BigDye®-Terminator-1.1.-Cycle-Sequencing-Kit (Applied Biosystems, Germany). Sequences were analyzed using the Vector-NTI-Contig-Express-software (Invitrogen, Germany).

RNA preparation and array based gene expression analysis

Total RNA was extracted from purified CD34+ haematopoietic progenitor cells using TRIzol (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The quality of RNA was determined by the 2100 Bioanalyzer system (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany) and only samples showing no RNA-degradation were included into the analysis. Oligonucleotide microarrays (HG-U133plus 2.0, Affymetrix Inc., Santa Clara, CA) were hybridized as described previously [30]. Data analysis was performed by the Microarray Suite 5.0 (Affymetrix), and the Genespring software 4.2 (Silicon Genetics, Redwood City, CA). The quality control parameters were in accordance to the MIAME consensus criteria for micro array data with a present call rate of at least 25% [31, 32].

Statistics

All samples were normalized with expression values raised to an arbitrary value of 1. Only expression values which reach a present call rate of 75% have been used. Only genes with a significant (p < 0.05) difference of expression between the CCR5 wild type and the CCR5-delta32 group were eligible for further statistical analysis. Expression analysis of the different groups was performed by using the Mann Whitney test.

Results

CCR5 genotyping

From 19 healthy donors, 12 individuals were found to be homozygous for CCR5 WT whereas 7 carried the CCR5-delta32 deletion allele.

Micro-array analysis

A total of 110 genes were found to be differentially expressed comparing WT and heterozygous carriers of CCR5-delta32. Eleven genes showed a significant higher expression in the wild type group and 99 genes were detected with a higher expression in the CCR5-delta32 group [data not shown]. Further review of gene databases concerning the known or proposed function of these genes regarding immune system and GVHD or location on chromosome 3 revealed 5 genes in the WT group and 6 genes in the CCR5-delta32 group with significantly different expression profiles (Table 1). Of these 11 genes, 5 were located on chromosome 3 and moreover two, CCRL2 and WD repeat domain, in the 3p region closely to the CCR5 gene (Figure 1).
Table 1

Gene expression and gene function

Significant higher Expression in CCR5 wild type samples

 

Gene

Location

Function

Ref.

1.

LRG1

19p13.3

Protein-protein interaction, signal transduction, and cell adhesion and development. Expression during granulocyte differentiation.

[35]

2.

CXCR2

2q35

Receptor for interleukin 8 and chemokine ligand 1. Mediates neutrophil migration to sites of inflammation.

[44]

3.

HSP70-2

6p21.3

Located in the MHC complex class III region, in a cluster with two closely related genes which encode similar proteins.

[45]

4.

CCRL2

3p21

Encodes a chemokine receptor like protein, most closely related to CCR1.

[46]

5.

RSRC1

3q25.32

Spliceosome assembly and participate in multiple steps of mRNA splicing.

[47]

Significant higher Expression in CCR5-delta32 samples

1.

CD6

11q13

Involved in T-cell activation.

[48]

2.

CD7

17q25.2-q25.3

Found on thymocytes and mature T cells. Mediates T-cell interactions and also in T-cell/B-cell interaction during early lymphoid development.

[49]

3.

CD30L

9q33

Early CD30 signalling is critical for Treg-mediated acute GVHD protection after major MHC-mismatch HSCT.

[50]

4.

SIAT1

3q27-q28

Catalyzes the transfer of sialic acid from CMP-sialic acid to galactose-containing substrates.

[51]

5.

ATP6V1A

3q13.31

Necessary for protein sorting, zymogen activation, receptor-mediated endocytosis, and synaptic vesicle proton gradient generation.

[52]

6.

WD repeat domain

3p21.31

Interacts with serine/threonine kinase 11, and is implicated in cell growth arrest.

[53]

Figure 1

Mapping the chemokine cluster on chromosome 3. The differentially expressed genes CCRL2 and WD repeat domain 6 are closely related to the CCR5 gene.

The 5 genes with higher expression in the WT group showed a particularly broad variation of expression values whereas in the corresponding group of CCR5-delta32 samples, the variation coefficient was 50% compared to 67% in the wild type group (Figure 2A). In the other group of 6 genes, it was noticeable that only small values of expression were detectable in the WT group compared to those obtained from the CCR5-delta32 samples (Figure 2B)
Figure 2

CCR5 gene array expression analysis. A. Genes with higher expression in the wild type (WT) group compared to the CCR5-delta32 heterozygous group. B. Genes with higher expression in the CCR5-delta32 heterozygous group compared to the WT group.

Discussion

The protective effect of alteration of CCR5 expression in patients after allogeneic HSCT and recipients of allografts has been proposed in several circumstances (Table 2). There, acute and chronic graft failure in recipients of allogeneic organs was significant reduced in the group of CCR5-delta32 patients. Furthermore, a significant association of the common CCR5 haplotype (H1/H1) and advantage of disease free survival and overall survival in recipients of allogeneic HSCT could have been found. The authors suggested CCR5 genotyping as a new diagnostic and prognostic strategy for therapy optimization [33].
Table 2

Transplantation and CCR5 polymorphism

No. of patients

Setting of transplantation

Genotyping

Recipients (R)/Donor (D)

Outcome

Ref.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

1370

HSCT (MURD)

(R): CCR5(H1/H1)

DFS ↑, OS ↑

[33]

  

(D): CCR5(H1/H1)

DFS ↓

 

349

HSCT

(MURD & MRD)

(R): CCR5-delta32

GvHD ↓

[19]

  

(D): CCR5-delta32

No acute GvHD*

 

1273

HSCT

(MURD)

(R): nd

 

[54]

  

(D): CCR5-delta32

GvHD ↓**

 

Solid organ transplantation

158

Liver

(R): CCR5-delta32

AR ↓

[55]

  

(D): nd

  

1227

Kidney

(R): CCR5-delta32

Allograft Survival ↑

[18]

  

(D): nd

  

163

Kidney

(R): CCR5-59029-A/G

AR ↓

[56]

  

(D): nd

  

158

Heart

(R): CCR5 No-E

EAR ↓

[57]

  

(D): nd

  

Summary of clinical trials focusing on the outcome of allogeneic stem cell or tissue transplantation in regard to different CCR5 polymorphism. In most cases, CCR5 genotyping was only performed in recipients. (HSCT = hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, MURD = matched unrelated donor, MRD = matched related donor, nd = not done, DFS = disease free survival, OS = overall survival, GVHD = graft-versus-host disease, AR = acute rejection, EAR = early acute rejection)

* in the case of CCR5-delta32 for both donor and recipient, respectively.

** not significant

The search for host factors and their genetic contribution to immune responses presumes fundamental understanding of pathogenesis. The association of candidate gene polymorphisms in several circumstances has provided new strategies of intervention. In the future, genomic tests will allow performing both, prognostic and predictive sub-typing of patient populations and of HSCT donors, respectively. Patients may benefit from especially selected donors targeted to their specific disease processes and will (probably) therefore have a reduced risk regarding development of life-threatening adverse events like GVHD.

In terms of immune activation, we found two genes (LRG1 and CXCR2) with significant higher expression in the wild type group, which are related to leukocyte differentiation and trafficking. LRG1 works as a secretory type 1 acute-phase protein whose expression is up-regulated by the mediator of acute-phase response [34]. However, its role in the context of GVHD is still to be determined. The LRG1 gene is localized to chromosome 19p13.3, a region to which the genes for several neutrophil granule enzymes also map and that has a proposed role in early neutrophilic granulocyte differentiation [35]. For CXCR2 there are data available on the effect of CXCR2 polymorphism in the context of GVHD. The transcriptional activity of the CXCR2 variant promoter was 2.6-fold higher than that of the wild-type promoter. However, no significant association was observed between CXCR2 polymorphisms and allograft outcomes [36].

Interestingly, three of the six genes overexpressed in the CCR5-delta32 group are important in T-cell (CD6 and CD7) or both T- and B-cell function (CD30L). For example, CD30 and its ligand CD30L may be an important co-stimulatory molecule and marker for the physiological balance between TH1/TH2 immune response associated with allograft rejection [37]. The CD30/CD30L pathway is a potent regulator of CD4+, but not CD8+, T cell-mediated GVHD. Although blocking CD30/CD30L interaction in vivo did not affect alloreactive CD4+ T cell proliferation or apoptosis, a substantial reduction in donor CD4+ T cell migration into the gastrointestinal tract was readily observed with minor effects in other GVHD target organs [38]. However, the role of CD30L and the CD30/CD30L interaction in immune response has still to be determined and recent studies in an CD30-/- animal model or pharmacological blockade of CD30/CD30L interaction are somehow contradicting [39]. Nevertheless, the CD30/CD30L interaction has been found to be critical for the suppressive effect on GVHD of CD4+CD25+ Treg (T regulatory) cells [40]. It has been assumed that Treg cells are one of the key players in reducing GVHD while preserving antitumor activity of memory CD8+ cells after allogeneic HSCT [41].

Here, we could describe two genes, CCRL2 and WD repeat domain 6, flanking the CCR5 gene on chromosome 3, which showed an altered expression profile comparing wild type and CCR5-delta32 heterozygous group. This could be evidence for a cluster co-regulation of these gene caused by the 32 base pair deletion in the CCR5 gene.

The other four altered genes HSP70-2, RSC1, SIAT1, ATP6V1A have no described association with immune responses or GVHD so far. HSP70-2 which is located in the HLA class III complex deciphers a putative role in autoimmune diseases [42, 43].

Conclusions

CCR5-delta32 deletion in hematopoietic stem cells might be associated with differential expression and some of these genes, such as CD30L, may have additional effects in the development of allogeneic immune responses. In terms of a personalized medicine, the long-term objective will probably be to perform additional screening for less favourable or beneficial genetic polymorphism with regard to an optimized donor selection for recipients of an allogeneic HSCT to prevent treatment related complications like GVHD.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant from the Deutsche José Carreras Leukämie Stiftung, Munich, Germany. We thank Susanne Ganepola for reading the manuscript.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of Transfusion Medicine and Immunology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University
(2)
Medical Department III (Hematology, Oncology), Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin
(3)
Medical Department III (Hematology, Oncology), University Medical Centre Mannheim, Heidelberg University

References

  1. Allen SJ, Crown SE, Handel TM: Chemokine: receptor structure, interactions, and antagonism. Annu Rev Immunol. 2007, 25: 787-820. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.24.021605.090529.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Oppermann M: Chemokine receptor CCR5: insights into structure, function, and regulation. Cell Signal. 2004, 16: 1201-1210. 10.1016/j.cellsig.2004.04.007.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Rossi D, Zlotnik A: The biology of chemokines and their receptors. Annu Rev Immunol. 2000, 18: 217-242. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.18.1.217.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Marchese A, Paing MM, Temple BR, Trejo J: G protein-coupled receptor sorting to endosomes and lysosomes. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2008, 48: 601-629. 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.48.113006.094646.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Bream JH, Young HA, Rice N, Martin MP, Smith MW, Carrington M, O'Brien SJ: CCR5 promoter alleles and specific DNA binding factors. Science. 1999, 284: 223-10.1126/science.284.5412.223a.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Carrington M, Dean M, Martin MP, O'Brien SJ: Genetics of HIV-1 infection: chemokine receptor CCR5 polymorphism and its consequences. Hum Mol Genet. 1999, 8: 1939-1945. 10.1093/hmg/8.10.1939.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. ENSEMBL: [http://www.ensembl.org]
  8. Stephens JC, Reich DE, Goldstein DB, Shin HD, Smith MW, Carrington M, Winkler C, Huttley GA, Allikmets R, Schriml L: Dating the origin of the CCR5-Delta32 AIDS-resistance allele by the coalescence of haplotypes. Am J Hum Genet. 1998, 62: 1507-1515. 10.1086/301867.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Galvani AP, Novembre J: The evolutionary history of the CCR5-Delta32 HIV-resistance mutation. Microbes Infect. 2005, 7: 302-309. 10.1016/j.micinf.2004.12.006.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Lim JK, Glass WG, McDermott DH, Murphy PM: CCR5: no longer a "good for nothing" gene--chemokine control of West Nile virus infection. Trends Immunol. 2006, 27: 308-312. 10.1016/j.it.2006.05.007.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Hancock WW: Chemokines and transplant immunobiology. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002, 13: 821-824.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Schroder C, Pierson RN, Nguyen BN, Kawka DW, Peterson LB, Wu G, Zhang T, Springer MS, Siciliano SJ, Iliff S: CCR5 blockade modulates inflammation and alloimmunity in primates. J Immunol. 2007, 179: 2289-2299.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Li J, Xia J, Zhang K, Xu L: Suppression of acute and chronic cardiac allograft rejection in mice by inhibition of chemokine receptor 5 in combination with cyclosporine A. J Surg Res. 2009, 157: 81-90. 10.1016/j.jss.2009.01.014.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Samson M, Libert F, Doranz BJ, Rucker J, Liesnard C, Farber CM, Saragosti S, Lapoumeroulie C, Cognaux J, Forceille C: Resistance to HIV-1 infection in caucasian individuals bearing mutant alleles of the CCR-5 chemokine receptor gene. Nature. 1996, 382: 722-725. 10.1038/382722a0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Liu R, Zhao X, Gurney TA, Landau NR: Functional analysis of the proximal CCR5 promoter. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 1998, 14: 1509-1519. 10.1089/aid.1998.14.1509.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Kuipers HF, Biesta PJ, Montagne LJ, van Haastert ES, van der Valk P, van den Elsen PJ: CC chemokine receptor 5 gene promoter activation by the cyclic AMP response element binding transcription factor. Blood. 2008, 112: 1610-1619. 10.1182/blood-2008-01-135111.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Alkhatib G: The biology of CCR5 and CXCR4. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2009, 4: 96-103. 10.1097/COH.0b013e328324bbec.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Fischereder M, Luckow B, Hocher B, Wuthrich RP, Rothenpieler U, Schneeberger H, Panzer U, Stahl RA, Hauser IA, Budde K: CC chemokine receptor 5 and renal-transplant survival. Lancet. 2001, 357: 1758-1761. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04898-4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Bogunia-Kubik K, Duda D, Suchnicki K, Lange A: CCR5 deletion mutation and its association with the risk of developing acute graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Haematologica. 2006, 91: 1628-1634.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Reddy P, Ferrara JL: Immunobiology of acute graft-versus-host disease. Blood Rev. 2003, 17: 187-194. 10.1016/S0268-960X(03)00009-2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Nowak J: Role of HLA in hematopoietic SCT. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2008, 42 (Suppl 2): S71-76.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Bacigalupo A, Palandri F: Management of acute graft versus host disease (GvHD). Hematol J. 2004, 5: 189-196. 10.1038/sj.thj.6200399.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Gao W, Faia KL, Csizmadia V, Smiley ST, Soler D, King JA, Danoff TM, Hancock WW: Beneficial effects of targeting CCR5 in allograft recipients. Transplantation. 2001, 72: 1199-1205. 10.1097/00007890-200110150-00003.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Bastani S, Sherman W, Schnickel GT, Hsieh GR, Bhatia R, Fishbein MC, Ardehali A: Chemokine receptor blockade with a synthetic nonpeptide compound attenuates cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Transplantation. 2009, 88: 995-1001. 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181b9ccd5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Jun L, Kailun Z, Aini X, Lei X, Guohua W, Sihua W, Ping Y, Tucheng S, Xionggang J, Wenwei C, Jiahong X: Combined treatment with chemokine receptor 5 blocker and cyclosporine induces prolonged graft survival in a mouse model of cardiac transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2010, 29: 461-470. 10.1016/j.healun.2009.09.019.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Viprakasit V, Kidd AM, Ayyub H, Horsley S, Hughes J, Higgs DR: De novo deletion within the telomeric region flanking the human alpha globin locus as a cause of alpha thalassaemia. Br J Haematol. 2003, 120: 867-875. 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2003.04197.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Mengelbier LH, Karlsson J, Lindgren D, Ora I, Isaksson M, Frigyesi I, Frigyesi A, Bras J, Sandstedt B, Gisselsson D: Deletions of 16q in Wilms tumors localize to blastemal-anaplastic cells and are associated with reduced expression of the IRXB renal tubulogenesis gene cluster. Am J Pathol. 2010, 177: 2609-2621. 10.2353/ajpath.2010.100130.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Samson M, Soularue P, Vassart G, Parmentier M: The genes encoding the human CC-chemokine receptors CC-CKR1 to CC-CKR5 (CMKBR1-CMKBR5) are clustered in the p21.3-p24 region of chromosome 3. Genomics. 1996, 36: 522-526. 10.1006/geno.1996.0498.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Maho A, Bensimon A, Vassart G, Parmentier M: Mapping of the CCXCR1, CX3CR1, CCBP2 and CCR9 genes to the CCR cluster within the 3p21.3 region of the human genome. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1999, 87: 265-268. 10.1159/000015443.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Hofmann WK, de Vos S, Komor M, Hoelzer D, Wachsman W, Koeffler HP: Characterization of gene expression of CD34+ cells from normal and myelodysplastic bone marrow. Blood. 2002, 100: 3553-3560. 10.1182/blood.V100.10.3553.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Brazma A, Hingamp P, Quackenbush J, Sherlock G, Spellman P, Stoeckert C, Aach J, Ansorge W, Ball CA, Causton HC: Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)-toward standards for microarray data. Nat Genet. 2001, 29: 365-371. 10.1038/ng1201-365.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Brazma A: Minimum Information About a Microarray Experiment (MIAME)--successes, failures, challenges. ScientificWorldJournal. 2009, 9: 420-423.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. McDermott DH, Conway SE, Wang T, Ricklefs SM, Agovi MA, Porcella SF, Tran HT, Milford E, Spellman S, Abdi R: Donor and recipient chemokine receptor CCR5 genotype is associated with survival after bone marrow transplantation. Blood. 2010, 115: 2311-2318. 10.1182/blood-2009-08-237768.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Shirai R, Hirano F, Ohkura N, Ikeda K, Inoue S: Up-regulation of the expression of leucine-rich alpha(2)-glycoprotein in hepatocytes by the mediators of acute-phase response. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009, 382: 776-779. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.03.104.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. O'Donnell LC, Druhan LJ, Avalos BR: Molecular characterization and expression analysis of leucine-rich alpha2-glycoprotein, a novel marker of granulocytic differentiation. J Leukoc Biol. 2002, 72: 478-485.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Ro H, Hwang YH, Kim H, Jeong JC, Lee H, Doh YS, Park HC, Oh KH, Park MH, Ha J: Association of polymorphisms of interleukin-8, CXCR1, CXCR2, and selectin with allograft outcomes in kidney transplantation. Transplantation. 2011, 91: 57-64. 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181fd0195.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Pellegrini P, Berghella AM, Contasta I, Adorno D: CD30 antigen: not a physiological marker for TH2 cells but an important costimulator molecule in the regulation of the balance between TH1/TH2 response. Transpl Immunol. 2003, 12: 49-61. 10.1016/S0966-3274(03)00014-5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Blazar BR, Levy RB, Mak TW, Panoskaltsis-Mortari A, Muta H, Jones M, Roskos M, Serody JS, Yagita H, Podack ER, Taylor PA: CD30/CD30 ligand (CD153) interaction regulates CD4+ T cell-mediated graft-versus-host disease. J Immunol. 2004, 173: 2933-2941.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Kennedy MK, Willis CR, Armitage RJ: Deciphering CD30 ligand biology and its role in humoral immunity. Immunology. 2006, 118: 143-152. 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2006.02354.x.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Dai Z, Li Q, Wang Y, Gao G, Diggs LS, Tellides G, Lakkis FG: CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells suppress allograft rejection mediated by memory CD8+ T cells via a CD30-dependent mechanism. J Clin Invest. 2004, 113: 310-317.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Kohrt HE, Pillai AB, Lowsky R, Strober S: NKT cells, Treg, and their interactions in bone marrow transplantation. Eur J Immunol. 40: 1862-1869.Google Scholar
  42. Vargas-Alarcon G, Londono JD, Hernandez-Pacheco G, Gamboa R, Castillo E, Pacheco-Tena C, Cardiel MH, Granados J, Burgos-Vargas R: Heat shock protein 70 gene polymorphisms in Mexican patients with spondyloarthropathies. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002, 61: 48-51. 10.1136/ard.61.1.48.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Niino M, Kikuchi S, Fukazawa T, Yabe I, Sasaki H, Tashiro K: Heat shock protein 70 gene polymorphism in Japanese patients with multiple sclerosis. Tissue Antigens. 2001, 58: 93-96. 10.1034/j.1399-0039.2001.580205.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Marcos V, Zhou Z, Yildirim AO, Bohla A, Hector A, Vitkov L, Wiedenbauer EM, Krautgartner WD, Stoiber W, Belohradsky BH: CXCR2 mediates NADPH oxidase-independent neutrophil extracellular trap formation in cystic fibrosis airway inflammation. Nat Med. 2010, 16: 1018-1023. 10.1038/nm.2209.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Singh R, Kolvraa S, Bross P, Christensen K, Bathum L, Gregersen N, Tan Q, Rattan SI: Anti-inflammatory heat shock protein 70 genes are positively associated with human survival. Curr Pharm Des. 16: 796-801.Google Scholar
  46. Galligan CL, Matsuyama W, Matsukawa A, Mizuta H, Hodge DR, Howard OM, Yoshimura T: Up-regulated expression and activation of the orphan chemokine receptor, CCRL2, in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2004, 50: 1806-1814. 10.1002/art.20275.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Cazalla D, Newton K, Caceres JF: A novel SR-related protein is required for the second step of Pre-mRNA splicing. Mol Cell Biol. 2005, 25: 2969-2980. 10.1128/MCB.25.8.2969-2980.2005.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Robinson WH, Neuman de Vegvar HE, Prohaska SS, Rhee JW, Parnes JR: Human CD6 possesses a large, alternatively spliced cytoplasmic domain. Eur J Immunol. 1995, 25: 2765-2769. 10.1002/eji.1830251008.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Hao QL, George AA, Zhu J, Barsky L, Zielinska E, Wang X, Price M, Ge S, Crooks GM: Human intrathymic lineage commitment is marked by differential CD7 expression: identification of CD7- lympho-myeloid thymic progenitors. Blood. 2008, 111: 1318-1326.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Zeiser R, Nguyen VH, Hou JZ, Beilhack A, Zambricki E, Buess M, Contag CH, Negrin RS: Early CD30 signaling is critical for adoptively transferred CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells in prevention of acute graft-versus-host disease. Blood. 2007, 109: 2225-2233. 10.1182/blood-2006-07-038455.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Lo NW, Lau JT: Transcription of the beta-galactoside alpha2,6-sialyltransferase gene (SIAT1) in B-lymphocytes: cell type-specific expression correlates with presence of the divergent 5'-untranslated sequence. Glycobiology. 1999, 9: 907-914. 10.1093/glycob/9.9.907.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Lu M, Ammar D, Ives H, Albrecht F, Gluck SL: Physical interaction between aldolase and vacuolar H+-ATPase is essential for the assembly and activity of the proton pump. J Biol Chem. 2007, 282: 24495-24503. 10.1074/jbc.M702598200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Xie X, Wang Z, Chen Y: Association of LKB1 with a WD-repeat protein WDR6 is implicated in cell growth arrest and p27(Kip1) induction. Mol Cell Biochem. 2007, 301: 115-122. 10.1007/s11010-006-9402-5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Ma Q, Gooley TA, Storb RF: CCR5 expression on cells from HLA-matched unrelated marrow donors and graft-versus-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010, 16: 132-133. 10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.05.017.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Heidenhain C, Puhl G, Moench C, Lautem A, Neuhaus P: Chemokine receptor 5Delta32 mutation reduces the risk of acute rejection in liver transplantation. Ann Transplant. 2009, 14: 36-44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Abdi R, Tran TB, Sahagun-Ruiz A, Murphy PM, Brenner BM, Milford EL, McDermott DH: Chemokine receptor polymorphism and risk of acute rejection in human renal transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002, 13: 754-758.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Simeoni E, Vassalli G, Seydoux C, Ramsay D, Noll G, von Segesser LK, Fleury S: CCR5, RANTES and CX3CR1 polymorphisms: possible genetic links with acute heart rejection. Transplantation. 2005, 80: 1309-1315. 10.1097/01.tp.0000178378.53616.ca.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Hütter et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.