Open Access

The role of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors in prostatic inflammation: a review

  • Christina Alves Peixoto1Email author and
  • Fabiana Oliveira dos Santos Gomes1
Journal of Inflammation201512:54

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12950-015-0099-7

Received: 22 April 2015

Accepted: 31 August 2015

Published: 15 September 2015

Abstract

Clinical and basic experimental evidence indicates that chronic inflammation is the greatest factor in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) progression, which is the most common cause of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS). The use of anti-inflammatory agents such as steroids, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and phytotherapics have been investigated as forms of treatment for various prostate diseases. Recent evidence has demonstrated that PDE5 inhibitors (PDE5Is) improve symptoms of BPH/LUTS, possibly as a result of the relaxing of the smooth muscle fibers of the bladder and prostate by NO/cGMPc signaling, or by improving RhoA/Rho-kinase (ROCK), and reduction of the hyperactivity of the autonomic nervous system. However, some results have suggested that besides vasodilatation and their anti-proliferative effect, PDE5Is exert a direct anti-inflammatory effect, by raising cGMP. Given that inflammation is major factor in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) progression, PDE5Is could act also restore prostatic function as they act as potent anti-inflammatory drugs. This review aims to provide a comprehensive summary of the use of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors to treat prostatic inflammation.

Keywords

Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors BPH LUTS Inflammation

Introduction

The cyclic monophosphate nucleotides cAMP and cGMP are synthesized by the guanylyl and adenylyl cyclase enzymes, respectively. They are recognized as important second messengers of extracellular signals. Through cyclic dependent protein kinases, PKA and PKG, control physiological functions, such as retinal phototransduction, smooth muscle relaxation, cardiac contractility, neuroendocrine signals, inhibition of platelet aggregation, degranulation of neutrophils, and myelogenic inflammatory response [15]. The critical role of cAMP and cGMP in intracellular signaling pathways has identified them as potential therapeutic targets [6, 7].

Mammalian phosphodiesterases (PDEs) comprise a large group of enzymes that hydrolyze cAMP and cGMP to their inactive forms 5′-GMP and 5′-AMP [8, 9]. Eleven PDE families have been described in order of discovery, amino acid sequence and catalytic and regulatory characteristics. Some PDEs, such as PDE4 and PDE7 are highly specific for cAMP hydrolysis, whereas PDE5, PDE6 and PDE9 are specific for cGMP. Some PDEs, such as PDE1, PDE2 and PDE3 hydrolyze both nucleotides [10]. Therefore, inhibitors of PDE (PDEIs) can prolong the intracellular action of cAMP and cGMP. There are potent non-selective PDEi, such as theophiline, and others that are specific, such as Rolipram for PDE4, and Sildenafil, Tadalafil and Vardenafil for PDE5 [7].

Potent and selective PDE5 inhibitors have been approved for therapeutic use for the condition of erectile dysfunction [11] and are currently also being used in the treatment of pulmonary hypertension [12, 13] and Raynaud’s phenomenon [14].

cGMP accumulation may inhibit inflammation, and as such it is a potential tool against the evolution of diseases in which inflammation plays a central role [15, 16, 8, 1719].

Chronic prostatitis is characterized by pelvic and genitourinary pain and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) that affect frequency and urgency and causes dysuria. Its precise aethiology remains unclear, although some possibilities include undetectable infection, trauma and immunological origin. Therapeutic management includes antibiotics and α-adrenergic blockers, but until now, no definitive treatment has been identified [20].

In this way, phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors may not only mediate smooth muscle relaxation, but also can directly reduce prostatic inflammation by increasing cGMP levels.

Phosphodiesterase-5 and inflammation

The nitric oxide (NO) is a highly reactive molecule with diverse physiological functions [21]. This messenger plays important roles in the modulation of vascular tone [22], neurotransmission [23, 24] and the immune system [25, 26]. NO is formed from L-arginine by NO synthases (NOS). In addition to the constitutive forms of the enzyme, endothelial (eNOS or NOS3) and neuronal (nNOS ou NOS1), the inducible form (iNOS or NOS2) is found in activated macrophages and other immune cells that produce NO in the micromolar range [27]. At these concentrations, NO induced oxidative DNA damage and modified protein structure and function, which can lead to cell death. Controversially, eNOS produces NO at nanomolar concentrations, which have been documented to have anti-inflammatory actions [28], which appear to be related directly or indirectly to the inhibition of the key transcription factor Nuclear Factor κB (NF-κB) [29, 30].

NO is also the main activator of soluble guanylyl cyclase (sGC), an enzyme that synthesizes cGMP. The level of cGMP is regulated by phosphodiesterases type 5 (PDE5s) enzymes, which break down the phosphodiesteric bond of cGMP. Several PDE5 inhibitors (PDE5Is) have been developed and used as therapeutic agents, as they increase cyclic nucleotide levels by blocking PDE function, enhancing NO-cGMP signalization [7].

Current concepts based on clinical and experimental data support a link between endothelial dysfunction and inflammation, manifested as deficiencies in the production of NO and prostacyclin [31]. The chronic consequence of endothelial dysfunction is initiation of vascular diseases. Sildenafil, the selective PDE5 inhibitor, widely used for treatment of erectile dysfunction in humans (Viagra®, Pfizer) has been shown to improve NOS activation of endothelial cells through ERK signaling [32]. In addition to increasing NO production by eNOS activation, Sildenafil also reduces the oxidative stress induced by hyperglicaemia and insulin resistance conditions [33]. Sildenafil also stimulates eNOS mRNA transcription in cardiomyocytes, resulting in increased expression of eNOS, elevated NO generation, guanylyl cyclase activation and enhanced GMPc formation [34]. Therefore, Sildenafil can elevate cGMP in two alternative ways: inhibiting PDE5 enzymes and/or inducing mRNA expression of eNOS.

Interestingly, acute and short-term administration of Sildenafil improves endothelial function in men with Type 2 diabetes [35], whereas chronic administration of Sildenafil, besides significantly improving endothelial function, can also reduce inflammatory markers (nitrite/nitrate levels, C-reactive protein, IL-6, ICAM-1 and VCAM-1) in patients with Type 2 diabetes [36]. In addition to improving endothelial function in patients with coronary arterial disease and diabetes, and reducing oxidative stress in many tissues [37, 38], Sildenafil can also normalize endothelial function and decrease plaque deposition in the aorta in experimental models of atherosclerosis [39].

Sildenafil has also been shown to be of potential benefit in the early phases of inflammation and vascular remodeling in a pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) experimental model. The administration of Sildenafil following Monocrotaline-induced PAH significantly reduced the severity of inflammation in the acute stage of the disease and prevented pulmonary arterial remodeling. These results suggest that in addition to its vasodilatation and anti-proliferative effects, Sildenafil has a direct anti-inflammatory effect [40].

The beneficial effect of the phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor has been demonstrated in experimental inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), a relapsing and remitting disease appearing as a form of ulcerative colitis or Crohn’s disease with a non-well-known etiology. Treatment of experimental IBD with Sildenafil reduced markers of oxidative stress such as myeloperoxidase (MPO) and lipid peroxidation product (TBARS) significantly, thereby modulating the inflammatory response [18]. Recent studies extended and confirmed the anti-inflammatory effect of PDE5 inhibitor in a rat model of colitis [41]. Other inhibitors of the PDE superfamily have been also proposed for IBD treatment, and PDE4, PDE5 and PDE7 inhibitors seem strong candidates for the next generation of effective drugs [42].

In caecal ligation and puncture (CLP), a model of polymicrobial sepis, PDE5 markedly attenuated injury in vital organs such as the kidney and lungs by inhibiting proinflammatory cytokine response and ROS generation [43].

Increased intracellular cGMP levels also lead to the suppression of colon tumor cell growth and the induction of apoptosis by activating cGMP dependent protein kinase (PKG). The COX inhibitory metabolite of sulindac, sulindac sulfide, as well as several other NSAIDs, such as indomethacin, meclofenamic acid and celecoxib, also inhibit PDE5 activity, which is closely associated to tumor cell growth [44, 45]. Studies involving human clinical specimens which reported higher PDE5 levels in colorectal, bladder, lung, and breast carcinomas than with normal epithelium [4649] corroborate these results.

Myeloperoxidase (MPO) level in the blood can be considered as a marker of endothelial dysfunction and could be a predictor of cardiovascular disease risk. The oxidation of LDL by MPO (MoxLDL) leads to a specific induction of the inflammatory response, increasing the release of cytokines such as interleukin 8 (IL-8) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) by endothelial cells and monocytes respectively [50]. According to Roumeguère et al [51] among the three available specific PDE5-Is for treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED), only tadalafil decreased the inflammatory response on endothelial cells stimulated by myeloperoxidase-modified low-density lipoprotein (Mox-LDLs) or tumor necrosis factor alpha. Mox-LDLs have been found in the atherosclerotic plaque but also in the corpus cavernosum of patients with ED of vascular origin [51].

Varma et al., [52] proposed that PDE5is have cardioprotective effects and also could be used to treat insulin resistance and inflammation. These authors provided evidence that tadalafil therapy reduced circulating inflammatory cytokines in diabetic animal model while improved fasting glucose levels and reduced infarct size after ischemia-reperfusion injury in the heart [52].

cAMP and cGMP may play a protective role in the modulation of some inflammatory cell activities of allergic disorders. Sildenafil inhibits inflammation and airway reactivity in animal models of airway diseases (asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), the effectiveness of which does not appear to be dependent on endogenous NO levels [53]. Similarly, vardenafil mimics the effect of NO by increasing GMPc levels with a subsequent reduction of histamine release and mast-cell-mediated allergic reactions [54]. Other studies reported that selective PDE4 inhibitors suppressed hematological and immunological markers of inflammation and were also effective in reducing specific airway resistance [55, 56].

The PDE5 inhibitors have also muscle and neuroprotective activities. The administration of sildenafil after bilateral cavernosal nerve resection preserves penile corporal smooth muscle and ameliorates fibrotic degeneration by down-regulating genes related to fibrosis and up-regulating genes related to smooth muscle preservation [57]. At the level of the pelvic ganglia, sildenafil exerts a neuroprotective effect by activating neurotrophic factors involved in neuronal survival and regeneration [58].

Garcia et al., [59] demonstrated that sildenafil can attenuate inflammation and oxidative stress in damaged cavernosal nerves by modulating cytokine expression and promoting a neuroprotective environment that favors neuron survival. According to such authors, initiation of the treatment immediately after surgery or even before radical prostatectomy would produce a better outcome, by promoting regeneration and functional recovery of the peripheral nerves [59].

Other studies have shown that the selective PDE5 inhibitors raise cGMP levels in the brain and offer protective effects, such as improvement of cognition and memory [60], reduction of neuronal cell death in ischemic cerebrovascular injury [61], reduction of white matter damage and regulation of inflammatory responses in Multiple Sclerosis models [62]. Interestingly, Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has been highly associated with cGMP signaling dysfunction and an ongoing inflammatory process. Zhang et al., [63] demonstrated that sildenafil prevents neuroinflammation, lowers beta-amyloid levels and improves cognitive performance in APP/PS1 transgenic mice, an AD experimental model [63]. On the other hand, Garcia-Barroso showed that tadalafil cross the blood-brain barrier and inhibits PDE5 present in the hippocampus, and that tadalafil was more effective than sildenafil in attenuating the phenotypic traits of a mouse model of AD [64].

Results obtained in our laboratory using a multiple sclerosis (MS) model demonstrated that sildenafil exerts an effective anti-inflammatory action, greatly reducing levels of IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-2 and cycloxygenase-2 (COX-2), as well as protecting myelin structure. Therefore, the oral administration of sildenafil can be a possible therapeutic tool for individuals with MS and other neuroinflammatory/neurodegenerative diseases, providing additional benefits to those of current treatments [4].

Phosphodiesterases and prostatic inflammation

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common cause of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS), which include poor urinary stream, urinary hesitancy, a feeling of incomplete bladder emptying, urgent and/or frequent urination, and urge incontinence. Approximately 40 % of men will have BPH by the age of 50, and 80 % by the age of 80 [65].

Clinical and basic experimental evidence indicates that chronic inflammation is the major factor in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) progression. Recognition of prostate secretion products by autoreactive T cells and animal models on experimental prostatitis demonstrate an autoimmune component to chronic inflammation. The close association between activated T cells and stromal cells suggests that these T cells trigger abnormal growth in the prostate as a result of their specific cytokine production. In BPH, these T cell-derived growth factors are strongly up-regulated and have been documented as stimulating stromal growth, matrix formation and angiogenesis [66]. Consistent with these findings, the REDUCE clinical trial has shown a relationship between prostatic inflammation and prostate volume, and the severity of LUTS [67].

A link between inflammation and prostate proliferative diseases such as BPH and Prostate Cancer (PCa) has also been suggested. Inflammatory infiltration is present in approximately 40 % of cases of patients with BPH, who have a significantly higher risk of BPH progression and acute urinary retention. Evidence from genetic studies supports the hypothesis that prostate inflammation may be a cause of PCa development [68].

In several types of human carcinoma, such as colon adenocarcinoma, bladder squamous carcinoma and lung cancers, PDE-5 expression is elevated, suggesting that these enzymes play a role in controlling cellular proliferation and apoptosis mechanisms [49, 69]. Additionally, in human prostate cancer cell lines, studies suggested that the increase of cAMP and cGMP initiates morphologic differentiation, inhibiting the growth and the invasive potential of these cells [70, 71].

Anti-inflammatory agents, whose effects are promising in terms of inhibition of cell proliferation [72], have been analyzed for the treatment of various prostate diseases such as steroids, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and phytotherapics. In vitro studies also found evidence of the antiproliferative effect of PDE inhibitors in smooth muscle cells from human BPH tissue [73, 74].

Preclinical and clinical studies have provided evidence that PDE5 inhibitors improve symptoms of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia/Symptoms of Upper Urinary Tract (BPH/LUTS), possibly as a result of their relaxing action via NO mechanisms, and inhibition of prostatic stromal cells proliferation [7577]. The possible use of PDE5 inhibitors for the treatment of prostate diseases is supported by the presence of PDE5 in the transition zone of the prostate, together with PDE4 and PDE11 [8], as well as the presence of PDE5 in blood vessels and in the muscular fibers of the bladder and urethra [78].

Several randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational trials have investigated the efficacy and safety of tadalafil [7987] or sildenafil [88, 89, 79, 9092] in the treatment of BPH-LUTS, as well as in the treatment of men with ED and with BPH-LUTS, leading to regulatory approval in the USA and Europe.

Nonsystematic and systematic reviews have tried to analyze the role of combined PDE5Is and α-blocker therapy, and have reported a significant improvement in urinary symptoms [76, 9295]. The most remarkable outcome from the first systematic review was that the combination of PDE5Is and α-adrenergic blockers can significantly improve maximum urinary flow rate, compared with only α-adrenergic blockers, whereas PDE5Is only did not increase Qmax, compared with placebo [92].

Similarly, a recent systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the effectiveness of oral drug therapies for BPH/LUTS revealed that of all the available drug treatments, combination therapy with α1-adrenoceptor antagonists and PDE5 inhibitor ranked highest in efficacy for decreasing the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) total score, storage subscore and voiding subscore. PDE5 inhibitors used alone also had a promising effect, except on maximum flow rate (Qmax). The results suggested that this combination therapy is the most efficient treatment of LUTS/BPH [96].

In 2010, Eryildirim et al. evaluated the effectiveness of sildenafil citrate on lower urinary system symptoms (LUTS) by using symptom score scales, and by analyzing whether or not the presence of asymptomatic inflammatory prostatitis altered the symptom scores. Patients were classified as category IV prostatitis (asymptomatic inflammatory prostatitis) by the presence of significant leukocytes (or bacteria or both) in secretion extracted by prostate massage and urine obtained after the massage. In cases of LUTS and ED without asymptomatic inflammatory, sildenafil citrate had an improving effect on LUTS as well as on ED. However, in cases with asymptomatic inflammatory prostatitis, sildenafil citrate did not lead to an improvement in LUTS [88]. In addition to the limitation of the study, which did not include a placebo group, was not randomized, and had a small sample size, the absence of results could be explained by the low number of PDE5Is doses, which were restricted to 50 mg sildenafil citrate administered twice a week for 30 days, ideal for ED treatment but not for chronic inflammation therapy.

Grimsley et al., proposed a hypothesis to explain the mechanism of action of sildenafil when ameliorating prostatitis symptoms. According to the authors these effects can be explained by the relaxation of the prostatic duct smooth muscle increasing washout of prostatic reflux products [20].

Cantoro et al. [89] evaluated the effectiveness of tamsulosin (α-adrenergic blocker) monotherapy versus tamsulosin plus sildenafil combination therapy on erectile dysfunction (ED) in young patients with type III chronic prostatitis, by using symptom score scales. They observed that tamsulosin monotherapy, as well as a combination therapy (tamsulosin plus sildenafil) had an improving effect on symptoms and on ED in patients with type III prostatitis [89].

Whether PDE5Is an effective prostatitis treatment or not remains controversial. However, it is important to highlight that until today pre-clinical and clinical studies have featured doses and short-term treatment, ideal for ED and BPH/LUTS treatment, not for chronic inflammation therapy. Although several experimental and clinical studies have found evidence of their possible benefits, no chronic treatment with PDE5Is has been performed to evaluate their effects on the human prostatitis.

It is important also to point out that PDE5Is have been chronically used as a pharmacological strategy for several non-urological disorders, such as pulmonary hypertension, Raynaud’s phenomenon and altitude sickness [76]. Although PDE5Is are considered safe drugs with few side effects, long-term studies are needed to evaluate their effects on the normal male reproductive system, specifically on the prostate. The ultrastructural and molecular analysis realized by our group demonstrated that chronic treatment of C57Bl/6 mice with sildenafil 25 mg/kg for 4 weeks enhanced prostatic glandular activity, however, no differences were observed in sGC, eNOS, PSA and TGF-β expression [97]. These results suggested that the chronic use of sildenafil does not cause evident prostatic damage, and therefore, seems safe for the treatment of a variety of disorders.

Recent studies have demonstrated that BPH/LUTS, prostatic cancer and metabolic syndrome (MetS) are often associated with one another [98]. Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a complex of clustering metabolic abnormalities and comprises a number of disorders such as insulin resistance, hypertension and obesity, which all act as known risk factors for erection dysfunction (ED).

Interestingly, some studies have shown that treatment with PDE5Is, in addition to relaxing the muscular wall, may positively affect low urinary tract blood perfusion, restoring function and causing morphologic changes in the bladder and prostate induced by chronic pelvic ischemia caused by MetS or hypertension [99, 100]. In spontaneous hypertensive rats, chronic treatment with tadalafil or other PDE5Is counteracted all LUTS alterations, most likely through increased blood perfusion and oxygenation [99101].

Hypertension, obesity, and hyperinsulinaemia have all been associated with increased sympathetic activity via enhanced glucose metabolism. This process promotes the activity of α-adrenergic receptors, increasing the smooth muscle tone of the male genitourinary tract [102, 103]. Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) contributes to the development and progression of BPH/LUTS. Since these molecules have a similar structure, insulin can bind to IGF-1 receptors and activate the signaling pathway for the growth and proliferation of epithelial and stromal prostatic cells [104]. Therefore, PDE5Is could be used as pharmacological tools for the treatment of ED, LUTS/BPH and chronic pelvic ischemia by smooth muscle relaxation via cGMP-dependent RhoA/Rho-kinase (ROCK) signaling inhibition [105108], and possibly by reducing autonomic hyperactivity, which is a component of the metabolic syndrome [109].

Moreover, chronic inflammation has also been claimed to be one of the putative links between MetS and BPH/LUTS. Recently, Vignozzi et al. [110] demonstrated that the PDE5 blockade exerts anti-inflammatory effects on human myofibroblast prostatic cells, blunting inflammatory and metabolic insults. These authors showed that treatment with tadalafil or vardenafil suppressed IL-8 and IP-10 secretion induced by inflammatory (TNF-α) and metabolic (oxLDL, AGE and IGF-1) stimuli. PDE5Is also inhibited the expression of inflammatory, fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transdifferentiation and tissue remodelling marker genes, most likely via the activation of cGMP/PKG signaling [110].

Conclusion

PDE5Is are therapeutical tools used for several urological and non-urological disorders, and experimental evidence suggest that their chronic use does not induce cellular and molecular prostatic alterations. The mechanisms involved in improvements observed in BPH/LUTS possibly include relaxation of the smooth muscles of the bladder and prostate by NO/cGMPc signaling or via improving RhoA/Rho-kinase (ROCK), and by reduction of the hyperactivity of the autonomic nervous system. PDE5Is can also direct and indirectly down-regulate prostatic inflammation/BPH/LUTS by inducing high levels of cGMP (Fig. 1). In conclusion, since inflammation is a major factor in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) progression, PDE5Is could also restore prostatic function, as they act as potent anti-inflammatory drugs.
Fig. 1

Schematic diagram showing the hypothetical mechanism of Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors (PDE5Is) on prostatic inflammmation. PDE5Is can direct and indirectly down-regulate prostatic inflammation/BPH/LUTS by inducing high levels of cGMP

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ). C.A.P. is supported by research fellowships from the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq).

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Laboratório de Ultraestrutura, Centro de Pesquisas Aggeu Magalhães (CPqAM-FIOCRUZ), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz

References

  1. Lincoln TM, Cornwell TL. Intracellular cyclic GMP receptor proteins. FASEB J. 1993;7:328–38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Corbin JD, FRANCIS SH. Cyclic GMP phosphodiesterase-5: target of Sildenafil. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:13729–32.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Baltrons MA, Pedraza C, Sardón T, Navarra M, García A. Regulation of NO-dependent cyclic GMP formation by inflammatory agents in neural cells. Toxicol Lett. 2003;139:191–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Nunes AK, Rapôso C, Luna RL, Cruz-Höfling MA, Peixoto CA. Sildenafil (Viagra®) down regulates cytokines and prevents demyelination in a cuprizone-induced MS mouse model. Cytokine. 2012;60:540–51.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Raposo C, Nunes AK, Luna RL, Araújo SM, da Cruz-Höfling MA, Peixoto CA. Sildenafil (Viagra) protective effects on neuroinflammation: the role of iNOS/NO system in an inflammatory demyelination model. Mediators Inflamm. 2013;321460.Google Scholar
  6. Shenoy P, Agarwal V. Phosphodiesterase inhibitors in the management of autoimmune disease. Autoimmun Rev. 2010;9:511–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Keravis T, Lugnier C. Cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase (PDE) isozymes as targets of the intracellular signalling network: benefits of PDE inhibitors in various diseases and perspectives for future therapeutic developments. Br J Pharmacol. 2012;5:1288–305.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Uckert S, Hedlund P, Andersson KE, Truss MC, Jonas U, Stief CG. Update on phosphodiesterase (PDE) isoenzymes as pharmacologic targets in urology: present and future. Eur Urol. 2006;50:1153–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Chung KF. Phosphodiesterase inhibitors in airways disease. Eur J Pharmacol. 2006;533:110–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Essayan DM. Cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitors and immunomodulation. Biochem Pharmacol. 1999;57(9):965–73.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Boolell M, Allen MJ, Ballard SA, Gepi-Attee S, Muirhead GJ, Naylor AM, et al. Sildenafil: an orally active type 5 cyclic GMP-specific phosphodiesterase inhibitor for the treatment of penile erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res. 1996;8:47–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Galiè N, Ghofrani HA, Torbicki A, Barst RJ, Rubin LJ, Badesch D, et al. Sildenafil citrate therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:2148–57.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Galiè N, Brundage BH, Ghofrani HA, Oudiz RJ, Simonneau G, Safdar Z, et al. Tadalafil therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension. Circulation. 2009;119:2894–903.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Roustit M, Hellmann M, Cracowski C, Blaise S, Cracowski JL. Sildenafil increases digital skin blood flow during all phases of local cooling in primary Raynaud’s phenomenon. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012;91:813–9.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Zhu J, Mix E, Winblad B. The antidepressant and anti-inflammatory effects of rolipram in the central nervous system. CNS Drug Rev. 2001;7:387–98.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Benjamins JA, Nedelkoska L. Cyclic GMP-dependent pathways protect differentiated oligodendrocytes form multiple types of injury. Neurochem Res. 2007;32:321–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Zhao S, Zhang L, Lian G, Wang X, Zhang H, Yao X, et al. Sildenafil attenuates LPS-induced pro-inflammatory responses through down-regulation of intracellular ROS-related MAPK/NF-ΚB signaling pathways in n9 microglia. Int Immunopharmacol. 2011;11:468–74.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Khoshakhlagh P, Bahrololoumi-Shapourabadi M, Mohammadirad A, Ashtaral-Nakhai L, Minaie B, Abdollahi M. Beneficial effect of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor in experimental inflammatory bowel disease; molecular evidence for involvement of oxidative stress. Toxicol Mech Methods. 2007;17:281–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Titus DJ, Oliva AA, Wilson NM, Atkins CM. Phosphodiesterase inhibitors as therapeutics for traumatic brain injury. Curr Pharm Des. 2014;21:332–42.PubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Grimsley SJ, Khan MH, Jones GE. Mechanism of Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor relief of prostatitis symptoms. Med Hypotheses. 2007;69:25–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Delledonne M, Polverari A, Murgia I. The functions of nitric oxide-mediated signaling and changes in gene expression during the hypersensitive response. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2003;5:33–41.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Palmer AC, Calder IM, Hughes JT. Spinal cord degeneration in divers. Lancet. 1987;2:1365–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Garthwaite G, Garthwaite J. Cyclic GMP and cell death in rat cerebellar slices. Neuroscience. 1988;26:321–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Knowles RG, Palacios M, Palmer RM, Moncada S. Formation of nitric oxide from L-arginine in the central nervous system: a transduction mechanism for stimulation of the soluble guanylate cyclase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989;86:5159–62.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Esplugues JV. NO as a signalling molecule in the nervous system. Br J Pharmacol. 2002;135:1079–95.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Stuehr DJ, Nathan CF. Nitric oxide - a macrophage product responsible for cytostasis and respiratory inhibition in tumor target cells. J Exp Med. 1989;169:1543–55.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Aranda E, López-Pedrera C, De La Haba-Rodriguez JR, Rodriguez-Ariza A. Nitric oxide and cancer: the emerging role of S-nitrosylation. Curr Mol Med. 2012;12:50–67.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Rizzo M, Kotur-Stevuljevic J, Berneis K, Spinas G, Rini GB, Jelic-Ivanovic Z, et al. Atherogenic dyslipidemia and oxidative stress: a new look. Transl Res. 2009;153:217–23.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Spiecker M, Peng HB, Liao JK. Inhibition of endothelial vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 expression by nitric oxide involves the induction and nuclear translocation of IkappaBalpha. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:30969–74.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Aizawa T, Wei H, Miano JM, Abe J, Berk BC, Yan C. Role of phosphodiesterase 3 in NO/cGMP-mediated antiinflammatory effects in vascular smooth muscle cells. Circ Res. 2003;93:406–13.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhang J, Xie Z, Dong Y, Wang S, Liu C, Zou MH. Identification of nitric oxide as an endogenous activator of the AMP-activated protein kinase in vascular endothelial cells. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:27452–61.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Yuan Z, Hein TW, Rosa Jr RH, Kuo L. Sildenafil (Viagra) evokes retinal arteriolar dilation: dual pathways via NOS activation and phosphodiesterase inhibition. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:720–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Mammi C, Pastore D, Lombardo MF, Ferrelli F, Caprio M, Consoli C, et al. Sildenafil reduces insulin-resistance in human endothelial cells. PLoS One. 2011;6:e14542.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Fisher PW, Salloum F, Das A, Hyder H, Kukreja RC. Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibition with sildenafil attenuates cardiomyocyte apoptosis and left ventricular dysfunction in a chronic model of doxorubicin cardiotoxicity. Circulation. 2005;111:1601–10.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. DeSouza C, Parulkar A, Lumpkin D, Akers D, Fonseca DA. Acute and prolonged effects of sildenafil on brachial artery flow-mediated dilatation in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:1336–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Aversa A, Vitale C, Volterrani M, Fabbri A, Spera G, Fini M, et al. Chronic administration of Sildenafil improves markers of endothelial function in men with Type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2008;25:37–44.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Milani E, Nikfar S, Khorasani R, Zamani MJ, Mohammad A. Reduction of diabetes-induced oxidative stress by phosphodiesterase inhibitors in rats. Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2005;140:251–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Shukla N, Jones R, Persad R, Angelini GD, Jeremy JY. Effect of sildenafil citrate and a nitric oxide donating sildenafil derivative, NCX 911, on cavernosal relaxation and superoxide formation in hypercholesterolaemic rabbits. Eur J Pharmacol. 2005;517:224–31.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Balarini CM, Leal MA, Gomes IB, Pereira TM, Gava AL, Meyrelles SS, et al. Sildenafil restores endothelial function in the apolipoprotein E knockout mouse. J Transl Med. 2013;11:3.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Bogdan S, Seferian A, Totoescu A, Dumitrache-Rujinski S, Ceausu M, Coman C, et al. Sildenafil reduces inflammation and prevents pulmonary arterial remodeling of the monocrotaline - induced disease in the Wistar rats. Maedica (Buchar). 2012;7:109–16.Google Scholar
  41. Margonis GA, Christoloukas N, Antoniou E, Arkadopoulos N, Theodoropoulos G, Agrogiannis G, et al. Effectiveness of sildenafil and U-74389G in a rat model of colitis. J Surg Res. 2015;193:667–74.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Salari P, Abdollahi M. Phosphodiesterase inhibitors in inflammatory bowel disease. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2012;21:261–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Cadirci E, Halici Z, Odabasoglu F, Albayrak A, Karakus E, Unal D, et al. Sildenafil treatment attenuates lung and kidney injury due to overproduction of oxidant activity in a rat model of sepsis: a biochemical and histopathological study. Clin Exp Immunol. 2011;166:374–84.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Li N, Xi Y, Tinsley HN, Gurpinar E, Gary BD, Zhu B, et al. Sulindac selectively inhibits colon tumor cell growth by activating the cGMP/PKG pathway to suppress Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Mol Cancer Ther. 2013;12:1848–59.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Soh JW, Kazi JU, Li H, Thompson WJ, Weinstein IB. Celecoxib induced growth inhibition in SW480 colon cancer cells is associated with activation of protein kinase G. Mol Carcinog. 2008;47:519–25.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Piazza GA, Thompson WJ, Pamukcu R, Alila HW, Whitehead CM, Liu L, et al. Exisulind, a novel proapoptotic drug, inhibits rat urinary bladder tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. 2001;61:3961–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Tinsley HN, Gary BD, Thaiparambil J, Li N, Lu W, Li Y, et al. Colon tumor cell growth-inhibitory activity of sulindac sulfide and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is associated with phosphodiesterase 5 inhibition. Cancer Prev Res. 2010;3:1303–13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Pusztai L, Zhen JH, Arun B, Rivera E, Whitehead C, Thompson WJ, et al. Phase I and II study of exisulind in combination with capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:3454–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Whitehead CM, Earle KA, Fetter J, Xu S, Hartman T, Chan DC, et al. Exisulind-induced apoptosis in a non-smallcell lung cancer orthotopic lung tumor model augments docetaxeltreatment and contributes to increased survival. Mol Cancer Ther. 2003;2:479–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Zouaoui Boudjeltia K, Legysser I, Van Antwerpen P, et al. Triggering of inflammatory response by myeloperoxidase-oxidized LDL. Biochem Cell Biol. 2006;84:805–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Roumeguère T, Zouaoui Boudjeltia K, Babar S, Nuyens V, Rousseau A, Van Antwerpen P, et al. Effects of phosphodiesterase inhibitors on the inflammatory response of endothelial cells stimulated by myeloperoxidase-modified low-density lipoprotein or tumor necrosis factor alpha. Eur Urol. 2010;57:522–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Varma A, Das A, Hoke NN, Durrant DE, Salloum FN, Kukreja RC. Anti-inflammatory and cardioprotective effects of tadalafil in diabetic mice. PLoS One. 2012;7:e45243.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Toward TJ, Smith N, Broadley KJ. Effect of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor, sildenafil (Viagra), in animal models of airways disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;169:227–34.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. El-Awady MS, Said E. Vardenafil ameliorates immunologic- and non-immunologic-induced allergic reactions. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2014;92:175–80.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Medvedova I, Prso M, Eichlerova A, Mokra D, Mikolka P, Mokry J. Influence of roflumilast on airway reactivity and apoptosis in ovalbumin-sensitized Guinea pigs. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2015;838:11–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Shih CH, Lin LH, Hsu HT, Wang KH, Lai CY, Chen CM, et al. Hesperetin, a selective phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor. Effectively suppresses ovalbumin-induced airway hyperresponsiveness without influencing xylazine/ketamine-induced anesthesia. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2012;2012:472897.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Sirad F, Hlaing S, Kovanecz I, Artaza JN, Garcia LA, Rajfer J, et al. Sildenafil promotes smooth muscle preservation and ameliorates fibrosis through modulation of extracellular matrix and tissue growth factor gene expression after bilateral cavernosal nerve resection in the rat. J Sex Med. 2011;8:1048–60.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Hlaing SM, Garcia LA, Kovanecz I, Martinez RA, Shah S, Artaza JN, et al. Sildenafil promotes neuroprotection of the pelvic ganglia neurons after bilateral cavernosal nerve resection in the rat. BJU Int. 2013;111:159–70.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Garcia LA, Hlaing SM, Gutierrez RA, Sanchez MD, Kovanecz I, Artaza JN, et al. Sildenafil attenuates inflammation and oxidative stress in pelvic ganglia neurons after bilateral cavernosal nerve damage. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15:17204–20.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Palmeri A, Privitera L, Giunta S, Loreto C. Puzzo Inhibition of phosphodiesterase-5 rescues age-related impairment of synaptic plasticity and memory. Behav Brain Res. 2013;240:11–20.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Zhang L, Yu W, Schroedter I, Kong J, Vrontakis M. Galanin transgenic mice with elevated circulating galanin levels alleviate demyelination in a cuprizone induced MS mouse model. PLoS One. 2012;7:e33901.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Pifarre P, Prado J, Baltrons MA, Giralt M, Gabarro P, Feinstein DL, et al. Sildenafil (Viagra) ameliorates clinical symptoms and neuropathology in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis. Acta Neuropathol. 2011;121:499–508.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Zhang J, Guo J, Zhao X, Chen Z, Wang G, Liu A, et al. Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor sildenafil prevents neuroinflammation, lowers beta-amyloid levels and improves cognitive performance in APP/PS1 transgenic mice. Behav Brain Res. 2013;250:230–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. García-Barroso C, Ricobaraza A, Pascual-Lucas M, Unceta N, Rico AJ, Goicolea MA, et al. Tadalafil crosses the blood-brain barrier and reverses cognitive dysfunction in a mouse model of AD. Neuropharmacology. 2013;64:114–23.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Alsaikhan B, Alrabeeah K, Carrier S. Management options for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia with or without erectile dysfunction: a focus on tadalafil and patient considerations. Int J Gen Med. 2014;7:271–6.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Kramer G, Mitteregger D, Marberger M. Is benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) an immune inflammatory disease? Eur Urol. 2007;51:1202–16.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Nickel JC, Roehrborn CG, O’Leary MP, Bostwick DG, Somerville MC, Rittmaster RS. The relationship between prostate inflammation and lower urinary tract symptoms: examination of baseline data from the REDUCE Trial. Eur Urol. 2008;54:1379–84.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Sciarra A, Di Silverio F, Salciccia S, Autran Gomez AM, Gentilucci A, Gentile V. Inflammation and chronic prostatic diseases: evidence for a link? Eur Urol. 2007;52:964–72.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Sarfati M, Mateo V, Baudet S, Rubio M, Fernandez C, Davi F, et al. Sildenafil and vardenafil, types 5 and 6 phosphodiesterase inhibitors, induce caspase-dependent apoptosis of B-chroniclymphocytic leukemia cells. Blood. 2003;101:265–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Bang YJ, Pirnia F, Fang WG, Kang WK, Sartor O, Whitesell L, et al. Terminal neuroendocrine differentiationof human prostate carcinoma cells in response to increased intracellular cyclicAMP. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91:5330–4.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Goto T, Matsushima H, Kasuya Y, Hosaka Y, Kitamura T, Kawabe K, et al. The effect of papaverine on mor-phologic differentiation, proliferation and invasive potential of human prostaticcancer LNCaP cells. Int J Urol. 1999;6:314–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Robert G, Smit F, Hessels D, Jannink S, Karthaus HF, Aalders T, et al. Biomarkers for the diagnosis of prostatic inflammation in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Prostate. 2011;71:1701–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. Adolfsson PI, Ahlstrand C, Varenhorst E, Svensson SP. Lysophosphatidicacid stimulates proliferation of cultured smooth muscle cells from human BPHtissue: sildenafil and papaverin generate inhibition. Prostate. 2002;51:50–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. Cook AL, Haynes JM. Protein kinase G II-mediated proliferative effects inhuman cultured prostatic stromal cells. Cell Signal. 2004;16:253–61.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Tinel H, Stelte-Ludwig B, Hütter J, Sandner P. Pre-clinical evidence for the use of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia and lower urinary tract symptoms. BJU Int. 2006;98:1259–63.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. Bella AJ, Deyoung LX, Al-Numi M, Brock GB. Daily administration of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors for urological and nonurological indications. Eur Urol. 2007;52:990–1005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  77. Wang C. Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors and benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology. 2010;20:49–54.Google Scholar
  78. Fibbi B, Morelli A, Vignozzi L, Filippi S, Chavalmane A, De Vita G, et al. Characterization of phosphodiesterase type 5 expression and functional activity in the human male lower urinary tract. J Sex Med. 2010;7:59–69.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  79. McVary KT, Monnig W, Camps Jr JL, Young JM, Tseng LJ, van den Ende G. Sildenafil citrate improves erectile function and urinary symptoms in men with erectile dysfunction and lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized, double-blind trial. J Urol. 2007;177:1071–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  80. Roehrborn CG, McVary KT, Elion-Mboussa A, Viktrup L. Tadalafil administered once daily for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia: a dose finding study. J Urol. 2008;180(4):1228–34.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  81. Roehrborn CG, Kaminetsky JC, Auerbach SM, Montelongo RM, Elion-Mboussa A, Viktrup L. Changes in peak urinary flow and voiding efficiency in men with signs and symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia during once daily tadalafil treatment. BJU Int. 2010;105(4):502–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  82. Dmochowski R, Roehrborn C, Klise S, Xu L, Kaminetsky J, Kraus S. Urodynamic effects of once daily tadalafil in men with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized, placebo controlled 12-week clinical trial. J Urol. 2010;183(3):1092–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  83. Porst H, Kim ED, Casabé AR, Mirone V, Secrest RJ, Xu L, et al. LVHJ study team. Efficacy and safety of tadalafil once daily in the treatment of men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia: results of an international randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Eur Urol. 2011;60(5):1105–13.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  84. Oelke M, Giuliano F, Mirone V, Xu L, Cox D, Viktrup L. Monotherapy with tadalafil or tamsulosin similarly improved lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia in an international, randomised, parallel, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Eur Urol. 2012;61(5):917–25.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  85. Brock G, Broderick G, Roehrborn CG, Xu L, Wong D, Viktrup L. Tadalafil once daily in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in men without erectile dysfunction. BJU Int. 2013;112:990–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Cui Y, Liu X, Shi L, Gao Z. Efficacy and safety of phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors in treating erectile dysfunction after bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Andrologia. 2015. doi:10.1111/and.12405 [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
  87. Bechara A, Casabe A, Rodriguez Baigorri G, Cobreros C. Effectiveness of tadalafil 5 mg once daily in the treatment of men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive to benign prostatic hyperplasia with or without erectile dysfunction: results from naturalistic observational TadaLutsEd study. J Sex Med. 2014;11:498–505.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  88. Eryildirim B, Aktas A, Kuyumcuoglu U, Faydaci G, Tarhan F, Ozgül A. The effectiveness of sildenafil citrate in patients with erectile dysfunction and lower urinary system symptoms and the significance of asymptomatic inflammatory prostatitis. Int J Impot Res. 2010;22:349–54.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  89. Cantoro U, Catanzariti F, Lacetera V, Quaresima L, Muzzonigro G, Polito M. Comparison of tamsulosin vs tamsulosin/sildenafil effectiveness in the treatment of erectile dysfunction in patients affected by type III chronic prostatitis. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2013;85:109–12.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  90. Kaplan SA, Gonzalez RR, Te AE. Combination of alfuzosin and sildenafil is superior to monotherapy in treating lower urinary tract symptoms and erectile dysfunction. Eur Urol. 2007;51:1717–23.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  91. Tuncel A, Nalcacioglu V, Ener K, Aslan Y, Aydin O, Atan A. Sildenafil citrate and tamsulosin combination is not superior to monotherapy in treating lower urinary tract symptoms and erectile dysfunction. World J Urol. 2010;28:17–22.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  92. Gacci M, Corona G, Salvi M, Vignozzi L, McVary KT, Kaplan SA, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors alone or in combination with α-blockers for lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia. Eur Urol. 2012;61:994–1003.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  93. Bechara A, Romano S, Casabé A, Haime S, Dedola P, Hernández C, et al. Comparative efficacy assessment of tamsulosin vs tamsulosin plus tadalafil in the treatment of LUTS/BPH. Pilot study. J Sex Med. 2008;5:2170–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  94. Liguori G, Trombetta C, De Giorgi G, Pomara G, Maio G, Vecchio D, et al. Efficacy and safety of combined oral therapy with tadalafil and alfuzosin: an integrated approach to the management of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms and erectile dysfunction. Preliminary report. J Sex Med. 2009;6:544–52.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  95. Martínez-Salamanca JL, Carballido J, Eardley I, Giuliano F, Gratzke C, Rosen R. Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors in the management of non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms: critical analysis of current evidence. Eur Urol. 2011;60:527–35.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  96. Wang X, Wang X, Li S, Meng Z, Liu T, Zhang X. Comparative effectiveness of oral drug therapies for lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9:e107593.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  97. Gomes FO, Carvalho MC, Saraiva KL, Ribeiro EL, E Silva AK, Donato MA, et al. Effect of chronic Sildenafil treatment on the prostate of C57Bl/6 mice. Tissue Cell. 2014;46:439–49.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  98. Hammarsten J, Peeker R. Urological aspects of the metabolic syndrome. Nat Rev Urol. 2011;8:483–94.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  99. Morelli A, Filippi S, Comeglio P, Sarchielli E, Chavalmane AK, Vignozzi L, et al. Acute vardenafil administration improves bladder oxygenation in spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Sex Med. 2010;7:107–20.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  100. Morelli A, Sarchielli E, Comeglio P, Filippi S, Mancina R, Gacci M, et al. Phosphodiesterase type 5 expression in human and rat lower urinary tract tissues and the effect of tadalafil on prostate gland oxygenation in spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Sex Med. 2011;8:2746–60.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  101. Zarifpour M, Nomiya M, Sawada N, Andersson KE. Protective effect of tadalafil on the functional and structural changes of the rat ventral prostate caused by chronic pelvic ischemia. Prostate. 2015;75:233–41.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  102. McVary KT. Unexpected insights into pelvic function following phosphodiesterase manipulation—what’s next for urology? Eur Urol. 2006;50:1153–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  103. Ozden C, Ozdal OL, Urgancioglu KH, Gokkaya S, Memis A. The correlation between metabolic syndrome and prostatic growth in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Eur Urol. 2007;51:199–203.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  104. De Nunzio C, Aronson W, Freedland SJ, Giovannucci E, Parsons JK. The correlation between metabolic syndrome and prostatic diseases. Eur Urol. 2012;61:560–70.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  105. Morelli A, Filippi S, Sandner P, Fibbi B, Chavalmane AK, Silvestrini E, et al. Vardenafil modulates bladder contractility through cGMPmediated inhibition of RhoA/Rho kinase signaling pathway in spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Sex Med. 2009;6(6):1594–608.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  106. Chang S, Hypolite JA, Changolkar A, Wein AJ, Chacko S, DiSanto ME. Increased contractility of diabetic rabbit corpora smooth muscle in response to endothelin is mediated via Rho-kinase beta. Int J Impot Res. 2003;15:53–62.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  107. Bivalacqua TJ, Champion HC, Usta MF, Cellek S, Chitaley K, Webb RC, et al. RhoA/Rho-kinase suppresses endothelial nitric oxide synthase in the penis: a mechanism for diabetes-associated erectile dysfunction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:9121–6.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  108. Vignozzi L, Morelli A, Filippi S, Ambrosini S, Mancina R, Luconi M, et al. Testosterone regulates RhoA/Rho-kinase signaling in two distinct animal models of chemical diabetes. J Sex Med. 2007;4:620–32.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  109. Lythgoe C, McVary KT. The use of PDE-5 inhibitors in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia. Curr Urol Rep. 2013;14:585–94.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  110. Vignozzi L, Gacci M, Cellai I, Morelli A, Maneschi E, Comeglio P, et al. PDE5 inhibitors blunt inflammation in human BPH: a potential mechanism of action for PDE5 inhibitors in LUTS. Prostate. 2013;73:1391–402.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Peixoto and Gomes. 2015