Skip to main content

Inflammatory events during murine squamous cell carcinoma development



Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is one of the most common human cancers worldwide. In SCC, tumour development is accompanied by an immune response that leads to massive tumour infiltration by inflammatory cells, and consequently, local and systemic production of cytokines, chemokines and other mediators. Studies in both humans and animal models indicate that imbalances in these inflammatory mediators are associated with cancer development.


We used a multistage model of SCC to examine the involvement of elastase (ELA), myeloperoxidase (MPO), nitric oxide (NO), cytokines (IL-6, IL-10, IL-13, IL-17, TGF-β and TNF-α), and neutrophils and macrophages in tumour development. ELA and MPO activity and NO, IL-10, IL −17, TNF-α and TGF-β levels were increased in the precancerous microenvironment.


ELA and MPO activity and NO, IL-10, IL −17, TNF-α and TGF-β levels were increased in the precancerous microenvironment. Significantly higher levels of IL-6 and lower levels of IL-10 were detected at 4 weeks following 7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene (DMBA) treatment. Similar levels of IL-13 were detected in the precancerous microenvironment compared with control tissue. We identified significant increases in the number of GR-1+ neutrophils and F4/80+/GR-1- infiltrating cells in tissues at 4 and 8 weeks following treatment and a higher percentage of tumour-associated macrophages (TAM) expressing both GR-1 and F4/80, an activated phenotype, at 16 weeks. We found a significant correlation between levels of IL-10, IL-17, ELA, and activated TAMs and the lesions. Additionally, neutrophil infiltrate was positively correlated with MPO and NO levels in the lesions.


Our results indicate an imbalance of inflammatory mediators in precancerous SCC caused by neutrophils and macrophages and culminating in pro-tumour local tissue alterations.


Inflammatory responses play decisive roles in different stages of tumour development, including initiation, promotion, progression, invasion, and metastasis. The tumour microenvironment, which is orchestrated by inflammatory cells, affects malignant cells through the production of cytokines, chemokines, growth factors, prostaglandins, reactive oxygen species (ROS) and nitric oxide (NO)[15]. Sub-lethal levels of ROS and NO, which are produced by activated neutrophils and macrophages, drive cancer development by inducing DNA damage[68]. They also stimulate cancer cell proliferation, assisting tumour establishment[5, 9]. Myeloperoxidase (MPO), which is abundantly expressed in neutrophils and to a lesser extent in monocytes and certain type of macrophages[10], has been strongly correlated with different types of cancer progression due to its role in ROS generation[2, 9, 11]. Additionally, the proteolytic enzyme elastase (ELA) is also involved with carcinogenesis and metastasis through degradation of the extracellular matrix, facilitating cancer invasion[12, 13].

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is one of the most common cancers in humans and typically arises from mutated ectodermal or endodermal cells lining body cavities. While SCC can occur in a large number of tissues, cells in the skin are frequently associated with cellular abnormalities in the basal layer of the epidermis resulting from UV-damaged keratinocytes[1416]. Although immunosuppression is currently considered to be a risk factor for SCC, inflammation is involved in SCC establishment, and UV light has been demonstrated to increase inflammatory infiltrates, which enhances skin tumour growth[17, 18]. In this manner, CXCL8 has been suggested as an earlier biomarker for SCC[19] because this chemokine, one of the most important neutrophil chemotactic and activating factors, is related to angiogenesis, tumour growth and metastasis[20]. However, other cytokines and chemokines that coordinate leukocyte migration to inflammatory sites and cellular trafficking through the lymph nodes and the spleen have been associated with SCC development[20, 21]. The two-stage 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)-anthracene (DMBA)/12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) skin carcinogenesis model, which triggers the initiation and promotion steps, respectively, has been commonly used to mimic squamous cell carcinoma, allowing for the investigation of several aspects of SCC[22, 23]. TPA/PMA tumour promotion is based on protein kinase C (PKC) activation culminating in the release of reactive oxygen species (ROS)[24, 25].

Because inflammatory events have been implicated in carcinogenesis and neutrophil infiltration is correlated with some types of cancer metastasis[26, 27], we used a multistage model of SCC to examine the involvement of ELA, MPO, NO, cytokines and inflammatory cells in tumour development.



Eight-week-old female BALB/c mice were purchased from the Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo. Each mouse was housed in an isolated cage. Food and water were provided ad libitum. The mice were maintained on a 12-h light/12-h dark photocycle in a controlled temperature environment and were quarantined for a minimum of 1 week before treatment. Groups of mice were randomly euthanised between 4 weeks and 16 weeks following 7,12-dimethylbenz-anthracene (DMBA) (Sigma-Aldrich®, St. Louis, MO, USA) application. A total of 36 mice were used in the study. All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Research Ethics Committee of the Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo.

DMBA/PMA-induced skin carcinogenesis initiation-promotion experiments

The experimental group received DMBA and 12-O-tetradecanoyl-phorbol-13-acetate (TPA) (Sigma-Aldrich®) as follows. Eight-week-old female mice were divided into 3 groups of three mice (at 4th, 8th and 16th weeks) each and were topically treated with four doses of DMBA (25 μg in 200 μl of acetone) and biweekly doses of TPA (200 μl of a 10–4 M solution in acetone) for 16 weeks. The experiment was performed 3 times. Papilloma and carcinoma development were monitored every three days throughout the experiment. Papillomas were characterised by folded epidermal hyperplasia protruding from the skin surface, and carcinomas were characterised as endophytic tumours presenting as plaques with an ulcerated surface. Experimental animals were cared for in accordance with institutional guidelines. Untreated mice were used as the control group. Samples were collected at different time points after initiation and were processed as described below. Lesions were initially identified macroscopically and subsequently identified through histological diagnosis.

Measurement of tumour growth

Skin tumours were measured using a precision calliper allowing discrimination to size modifications >0.1 mm. Tumour volumes were measured the first day of treatment and every week until the day that they were humanely killed and the lesions were measured according to followed: volume = 0.4 ab2, where a and b are the larger and smaller diameters, respectively[28].

Histological analysis

Tissue samples were collected from tumour sites and fixed with 10% (v/v) formalin for 6 hours at room temperature. The tissues were subsequently dehydrated in ethyl alcohol followed by washes in xylol and were then embedded in paraffin. Each sample was sectioned into 5- to 7-μm-thick slices that were dried onto slides and stained with hematoxylin and eosin.

Isolation of leukocytes

To characterise the leukocytes present at the tumour site, biopsies of skin lesions from mice were collected and incubated for 1 h at 37°C in RPMI 1640 medium containing 50 μg/mL of a collagenase CI enzyme blend (Boehringer Ingelheim Chemicals, Normandy Drive Petersburg, VA, USA). The tissues were subsequently dissociated for 4 min in RPMI 1640 (GIBCO®, Life Technologies, Staley Road Grand Island, NY, USA) with 10% bovine foetal serum (GIBCO®, Life Technologies) and 0.05% DNase (Sigma-Aldrich®) using a Medimachine (BD Biosciences, Qume Drive San Jose, CA, USA) cytometry sample preparation system, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The tissue homogenates were filtered using a 30-μm cell strainer (Falcon; BD Biosciences). Leukocyte viability was evaluated by Trypan blue exclusion, and these cells were subsequently used for cell activation and immunolabelling assays.

Antibodies (Abs) and flow cytometry analysis

For immunostaining, PE- and FITC-conjugated Abs directed against CD11b (17A2), LY6G/GR-1+ (H129.19), F4/80 (6F12) and the respective goat and rat isotype controls were used (BD Biosciences). Intracellular IL-17 (BD Biosciences) in leukocytes obtained from lesions and lymph nodes was detected using Cytofix/Cytoperm and Perm/Wash buffer from BD Biosciences, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, the cells were labelled with Abs directed against the cell surface antigens. Following surface staining, the cells were fixed, permeabilised, and stained with PE-labelled anti-mouse IL-17 (MACS Miltenyi Biotech, Miltenyi Biotec GmbH, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) or the isotype control. The samples were acquired on a FACSort flow cytometer, and the data were analysed using CellQuest software (BD Biosciences).

Immunofluorescence analysis and confocal microscopy

Slides for double immunofluorescence staining were post-fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and blocked with protein-block assay diluent (BD Company). After washing with PBS, the slides were incubated with the primary antibody, washed again, and incubated with the appropriate fluorochrome-conjugated (Texas Red or FITC) secondary antibodies. After washing, the slides were mounted using mounting medium with DAPI (Vector Laboratories®, Burlingame, CA, USA) to stain the nucleus and were then analysed by confocal microscopy. Images were captured with a Leica TCS SPE confocal laser system equipped with a 63 oil-immersion plan apochromatic objective (1.3 CS) with differential interference contrast. LAS AF 2.5.1 software was used for image acquisition.

Cytokine assays

The tumour sample supernatants were obtained by disaggregation through treatment with RPMI 1640 medium containing 0.25% collagenase (Worthington Biochemical Corporation, Lakewood, NJ, USA) and were frozen at −80°C until analysis. The total protein concentration was measured using a Quick StartTM Bradford Protein assay kit (Bio-Rad, CA, USA). TNF-α, IL-6, IL-10 and TGF-β levels in the samples were quantified using a quantitative sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) that employed commercial capture and biotinylated detection antibodies (BD Pharmingen Corp., San Diego, CA), and the respective recombinant mouse cytokines (diluted in PBS) as standards according to the manufacturer’s instructions. IL-13 and IL-17 levels were determined using an eBioscience kit (eBioscience®, San Diego, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The concentration of each cytokine was dosed as pg/mL, and the results were normalised and expressed as mg/protein.

Myeloperoxidase (MPO) and elastase (ELA) activities

MPO and ELA activities in the samples were assessed after obtaining tissue supernatants by disaggregation through treatment with RPMI 1640 (Gibco) medium containing 0.25% collagenase (Worthington Biochemical Corporation) as described previously[29].

Nitric oxide production

To detect NO in lesions or skin samples, nitrite (NO-2) production was measured in the supernatant samples using the Griess method[29]. Briefly, 50 μL of supernatant samples were incubated with an equal volume of Griess reagent at room temperature. The absorbance was measured on a plate scanner (Spectra Max 250; Molecular Devices, Sunnywale, California, USA) at 540 nm. The NO-2 concentration was determined using a standard curve for NaNO2 at a concentration range from 1 to 200 μM.

Statistical analysis

The results are expressed as the mean ± SD, and statistical analysis was performed using unpaired Student’s t-tests to compare each experimental group with the control group and a one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test to compare all groups (GraphPad software 4). p ≤ 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.


The appearance of chemically induced papillomas is accompanied by increased neutrophil infiltration

Papillomas were found in 100% of DMBA/TPA-treatment mice seven weeks after carcinogenic induction (data not shown). The greatest number of papillomas was found at 16 weeks (10.7 ± 2 lesions) (Figure1A and1G). Lesions found at this time were significantly more extensive (since 4.5 until >40 mm) than those found during the 4th and 8th weeks (Figure1B). Histological analysis revealed polymorphonuclear cells in the superficial layers of the epithelium at 4 weeks (Figure1D), with pronounced inflammatory cell presence and intense epithelial cell mitotic activity at 8 weeks (Figure1F). Intense inflammatory infiltrate and mitotic activity and epithelial islet formation were observed at 16 weeks after DMBA/TPA treatment (Figure1H). We identified polymorphonuclear and mononuclear inflammatory cells in different layers of the skin tissue after DMBA treatment (Figure1D,1F and1H).

Figure 1

Squamous cell carcinoma induced by DMBA/TPA in mice. SCC mice were treated according to a chemical carcinogenic protocol using DMBA and TPA for 16 weeks. Papilloma incidence (A) and tumor volume (B) were determined in SCC mice. Each value represents mean ± SEM of 9 different mice. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 and *** P< 0.001. Panels C, E and G are representative photomicrographs of dorsal tissue from SCC mice. Haematoxylin and eosin staining of skin tissue sections from BALB/c mice 4(D), 8(F) and 16 (H) weeks after chemical carcinogenesis. Data are from one experiment that is representative of three independent experiments (n = 9 mice per group). Arrows indicate inflammatory cells.

Inflammatory mediators levels during the establishment of SCC.

Because tissue damage triggered by inflammatory mediators is associated with cancer establishment, we evaluated MPO and ELA activity in the chemically treated tissue samples (Figure2). The results showed increased MPO activity at 4 weeks (1348 ± 334.7 units/mg), 8 weeks (2975 ± 1231 units/mg) and 16 weeks (1187 ±3 21.8 units/mg) following DMBA/TPA treatment in comparison with control mice (159.9 ± 12.3 units/mg) (Figure2A).

Figure 2

MPO, NO and ELA levels in the tumour microenvironment. MPO (A), NO (B) and ELA (C) levels were analyzed in the tumor and control untreated tissue as described in the methods and materials section. Results are expressed as the mean ± SEM from each individual mouse analyzed. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 and *** P< 0.001.

NO levels in the tissue samples were significantly higher after chemical treatment compared to the control group (Figure2B). Interestingly, the highest levels of NO were detected in the 8-week group (1460 ± 215.1μM) (Figure2B), which was also verified by MPO activity (Figure2A).

ELA activity increased as a function of the time of treatment. The 4-week (9.8 ± 2.4 units/mg), 8-week (22.4 ± 17.2 units/mg) and 16-week (54.6 ± 9.9 units/mg) groups all had ELA activities that were significantly higher than that of the control group (2.19±0.2 units/mg) (Figure2C).

Cytokine levels in the tumour microenvironment during the establishment of SCC

To evaluate cytokine expression during the development and establishment of experimental SCC, we analysed IL-6, IL-10, IL-13, IL-17, TNF-α and TGF-β levels in the lesion tissues (Figure3). At 16 weeks following DMBA treatment, levels of all of these cytokines with the exception of IL-6 had significantly increased in the treated tissues compared with control skin (Figure3A-3F). Among the treated groups, significantly higher levels of IL-10, IL-17, TNF-α and TGF-β were detected in the 16 week group compared with the 4 and 8 week groups (Figures 3B,3D,3E and3F). Although IL-13, TNF-α and TGF-β levels increased in all groups compared with control samples (Figures 3C,3E and3F), IL-10 levels decreased at 4 weeks after DMBA treatment (620.8 ± 68 pg/mg) and increased to levels higher than that of the control group at 8 weeks (9876 ± 1120 pg/mg) (Figure3B). The highest levels of IL-6 were detected at 4 weeks (14403 ± 3026 pg/mg) compared to the 8 week (4193 ± 1065 pg/mg), 16 week (1673 ± 309.8 pg/mg) and control groups (474.9 ± 11.1 pg/mg) (Figure3A).

Figure 3

Cytokine levels in the tumour microenvironment. IL-6 (A), IL-10 (B), IL-13 (C), IL-17 (D), TNF-α (E) and TGF-β (F) levels were analyzed by ELISA. Results are expressed as the mean ± SEM from each individual mouse analyzed (n=9 mice per group). *P<0.05, **P<0.01 and *** P < 0.001.

In agreement with these data, a significant increase in cytokine levels was detected during SCC development compared with the untreated group (week 0). We verified that the highest levels of the cytokines IL-10, IL-17, TNF-α and TGF-β were present at 16 weeks (Figure3).

Determination of macrophages and neutrophils infiltrating squamous cell carcinoma lesions

To determine if the increased cytokine levels recruited increased numbers of inflammatory cells, we evaluated the number of leukocytes in the lesions (Figure4A). As expected, the number of leukocytes infiltrating the lesions increased over time, increasing from 0.7 ± 0.06x106 in the 4th week to 0.9 ± 0.13x106 in the 8th week and 1.5 ± 0.3x106 in the 16th week (Figure4A). However, significant differences were only detected between the 16-week group and the 4- and 8-week groups (p<0.05, Figure4A).

Figure 4

Inflammatory infiltrates in mouse squamous cell carcinoma. The total number of leukocytes (A) and the number of cells expressing GR1 and F4/80 (B) were determined during the 4th (4W), 8th (8W) and 16th (16W) weeks after DMBA protocol. Results are expressed as the mean ± SEM from each individual mouse analyzed (n=9 mice per group). *P< 0.05 and *** P< 0.001. Representative photomicrograph of GR1+ (green), F4/80+ (red) and IL-17+ cells (red) infiltrating tumour lesions. Representative tumour is shown. Blue, DAPI.

We next analysed the inflammatory infiltrates, assessing the presence of neutrophils and macrophages in chemically treated tissues from the mice at 4, 8 and 16 weeks following DMBA treatment (Figure4B-4C). To determine the neutrophil and macrophage phenotypes present in the tissues infiltrates, the percentage of cells expressing GR-1 and F4/80 were evaluated by flow cytometry (Figure4B). Neutrophils, as characterised by a GR-1+/F4/80- phenotype, were increased at 4 (34.6 ± 2.5%) and 8 weeks (55.9 ± 3.2%) compared with 16 weeks (27.3 ± 3.8%). Macrophages were also present at higher percentages in the 4th (47.7 ± 4.9%) and 8th (35.6 ± 3.2%) week compared to the 16th week (24.3 ± 6.1%) (Figure4B). However, macrophages exhibiting an activated phenotype and characterised by expression of both GR-1 and F4/80 were present at a significantly higher concentration at 16 weeks (57.7 ± 0.9%) than at 4 (20.5 ± 5.7%) or 8 weeks (26.5 ± 5.9%) following DMBA/TPA treatment (Figure4B). Representative photomicrographs show immunofluorescence staining for 4 weeks (Figure4C-D), 8 weeks (Figure4E-F) and 16 weeks (Figure4 G-H) following DMBA application.

Although the milieu of cytokines and oxidative compounds might influence SCC establishment and progression, the lesions only showed correlation with ELA, IL-10 and IL-17 (Table 1).

Table 1 Correlation between lesions and inflammatory mediators during the chemical-induced squamous cell carcinoma development

Neutrophil tissue infiltration was positively and significantly correlated with MPO and NO levels in the epithelial tissues (Table 2). While we did not find any correlation between the presence of neutrophils and papillomas or tumour lesions, macrophages were positively and significantly correlated with both lesions (Tables 2 and s3). In addition, macrophages were positively and significantly correlated with ELA activity and IL-10 and IL-17 levels in epithelial tissues between 0 and 16 weeks (Table 3).

Table 2 Correlation between neutrophils and inflammatory mediators during the chemical-induced squamous cell carcinoma development
Table 3 Correlation between F4/80 + GR1 + macrophages and inflammatory mediators during chemical-induced squamous cell carcinoma development


Cancer is a complex, multistage process characterised by molecular alterations regulated by both genetic and epigenetic mechanisms[30]. Because DNA lesions and methylation states are influenced by oxidative species catalysed by MPO, it is logical to assume that an association exists between this enzyme and cancer initiation[3032]. Polymorphisms in the MPO gene promoter region are associated with a reduced risk of cancer[3335]. Here, we demonstrate the presence of neutrophils and activated macrophages during the development of chemically induced squamous cell carcinoma. This cell infiltration was accompanied by myeloperoxidase and elastase activity and the presence of nitric oxide. Both myeloperoxidase (MPO) and elastase (ELA) are enzymes that are abundantly secreted by activated neutrophils, a mechanism that helps these cells to defend against aggression[10, 36]. MPO dimeric alpha-heme halo peroxidase present in azurophilic granules makes up approximately 5% of the dry weight of the neutrophil[37]. Although MPO is correlated with a better prognosis in different types of tumours such as breast cancer[34, 3841], the majority of studies have shown an important role for MPO in cancer progression[2, 9, 11, 31]. It was shown that TPA-stimulated mouse neutrophils exhibit DNA damage resulting from hydrogen peroxide-induced breaks[42]. In support of this finding, we found MPO to be significantly more active in chemically treated mice than in control mice, and we found a positive correlation with neutrophil infiltration.

Both MPO and ELA appeared to contribute to tissue and extracellular matrix degradation, enhancing cancer development by destroying natural barriers against metastasis[43, 44]. Several studies have also described elastinolytic enzyme production by human and rodent mammary tumour cells that facilitates their dissemination[10, 45, 46]. ROS-mediated oxidative tissue damage and ROS-mediated upregulation of the gene expression responsible for recruitment of inflammatory cells can both inhibit tumour growth and support the metastatic growth of tumour cells[5, 24, 25].

Although three types of ELA have been characterised in mammals, only neutrophil elastase (NE) is able to degrade insoluble elastin and hydrolyse other extramatrix proteins, including fibronectin, proteoglycans, and type IV collagen[13, 47, 48]. NE has also been shown to increase cancer cell malignancy through mechanisms that are still unclear[13]. We detected high ELA activity at 4 weeks after DMBA/TPA treatment that persisted until 16 weeks and increased as the lesions grew. It is possible that ELA sources such as macrophages, neutrophils, and cancer cells change during chemically induced SCC development. Our data showed that macrophage but not neutrophil infiltration was correlated with ELA activity in the lesions. This result should be further elucidated in the future.

Because our results indicated the involvement of inflammation during chemically induced SCC development, and a key molecular link between inflammation and tumour promotion and progression is the NF-kB signalling pathway, which is activated by many proinflammatory cytokines[49, 50], we analysed cytokine production in the tumour microenvironment. IL-6 was significantly enhanced at 4 weeks after DBMA/TPA treatment, while IL-10 levels were lowest in these samples (Figure4). IL-6 and TNF-α are the major pro-inflammatory cytokines implicated in inflammation-associated carcinogenesis, enhancing tumour cell growth[51, 52]. Because the highest levels of IL-6 occurred at the onset of SCC induction, it is possible that this cytokine plays a role in cancer establishment in our model. IL-6 has also been shown to inhibit the extrinsic and intrinsic apoptotic pathways of skin cells, supporting the hypothesis that it may contribute to tumourigenesis[53]. Although IL-6 has previously been connected with squamous cell carcinoma bone invasion, which occurs during late stages of the disease[54], the highest concentration of this cytokine was detected at the beginning of DMBA-treatment. TNF-α also has also been proposed to contribute to squamous cell carcinoma tumour initiation and bone invasion[54] by stimulating the production of genotoxic molecules that can lead to DNA damage and mutations, such as NO[55], which is increased in all treated groups (Figure2B)[5658]. Levels of IL-13 were also diminished in chemically treated skin after the 4th week (Figure3C). Because IL-13 can negatively regulate anti-tumour immunity modulating NKT cell function, it may cooperate in cancer development[59].

The dual functions of IL-10 in antitumor immunity and immunoregulation have been recognized for some time[60]. In our study, the low levels of IL-10 detected in tumour initiation phase could be contributed to murine SCC development. IL-10 has been shown to modulate apoptosis and suppress angiogenesis and enhance the production of tumor-toxic molecules (e.g., nitric oxide)[61, 62] and low levels of this cytokine could be favour tumor development. In fact, IL-10 deficient mice were more sensitive to DMBA/TPA induced papilloma[63]. In the promotion and progression phase, we detected a significant enhancement in IL-10 at 8 and 16 weeks after DMBA/TPA treatment. An IL-10 autocrine or paracrine loop might play an important role in tumour cell proliferation and survival through the upregulation of antiapoptotic genes such as BCL-2 or BCL-XL[6466]. In addition, IL-10 inhibits secretion of the proinflammatory cytokines by CD4+ T cells and impairs CD8+ T cells response, whereas tumor clearance can be enhanced in the absence of IL-10[67, 68].

In the 16th week, the cytokines IL-10, IL-17, TGF-β and TNF-α were detected at the highest overall level, creating a chronic inflammation cytokine milieu that may lead to antitumour immunity eradication and accelerated tumour progression. TGF-β enhances tumour invasion and, with TNF-α, affects stromal cells, facilitates angiogenesis, and impairs NK cells, CD8+ T cells and macrophage activity against tumours[58, 69, 70]. Additionally, TGF-β-induced inflammation in precancerous epidermal squamous lesions has been shown to require IL-17[71]. IL-17 has also been associated with different types of cancer and may be expressed by tumour- associated macrophages and neutrophils to a lesser degree[69, 72, 73]. We found significant percentages of GR-1+ macrophages in the tumour tissue at 16 weeks (Figure4B), and this macrophage phenotype has been reported to express IL-12p40 and iNOS[74]. However, GR1+F4/80+ cells have been reported to have negative effects on tumour protection[75]. Neutrophils and GR-1- macrophages were the predominant cell type in lesion tissue at 4 and 8 weeks (Figure4B), and GR-1- macrophages are poor producers of NO[74]. These data suggest that MPO and NO were primarily produced by neutrophils at the start of SCC development and establishment (Table 2). However, ELA seemed to be primarily produced by activated macrophages along with IL-10 and IL-17, correlating with lesion appearance (Table 3).

In summary, the data presented here are in according with previous studies[29], which show that inflammatory mediators activate the remodeling of the tumor microenvironment through recruitment of leukocytes. The data presented here expand previous observation's by demonstrate that DMBA-induced inflammatory mediators are produced in the initial phase of carcinogenesis by activated neutrophils and macrophages. These findings may have broad implications besides providing a better insight into the mechanisms involved in DMBA-induced carcinogenesis. Increase of inflammatory mediators such as NO, active MPO and ELA, which are up-regulated in response to chronic inflammation, can increase mutation rates because induce DNA damage and genomic instability, in addition to enhancing the proliferation of mutated cells[29]. These events are associated with tumor initiation and progression, suggesting that inflammatory mediators may play an important role in initiation and promotion phase of SCC development. These findings represent a significant step towards in carcinogenesis.


Our results suggest that activated neutrophils and macrophages are involved in inflammatory mediator production in tumour microenvironment. These cells may drive some immunity-related skin tissue damage and support cancer establishment.


  1. 1.

    Wherry EJ: T cell exhaustion. Nat Immunol. 2011, 12: 492-499.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Mika D, Guruvayoorappan C: Myeloperoxidase: the yin and yang in tumour progression. J Exp Ther Oncol. 2011, 9: 93-100.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Sansone P, Bromberg J: Environment, inflammation, and cancer. Cur Opin Gen Develop. 2011, 21: 80-85. 10.1016/j.gde.2010.11.001.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Grivennikov SI, Greten FR, Karin M: Immunity, inflammation, and cancer. Cell. 2010, 140: 883-899. 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.025.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Nishikawa M: Reactive oxygen species in tumor metastasis. Cancer Lett. 2008, 266: 53-59. 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.02.031.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Wiseman H, Halliwell B: Damage to DNA by reactive oxygen and nitrogen species: role in inflammatory disease and progression to cancer. Biochem J. 1996, 313: 17-29.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Nishikawa M, Hashida M, Takakura Y: Catalase delivery for inhibiting ROS-mediated tissue injury and tumor metastasis. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2009, 61: 319-326. 10.1016/j.addr.2009.01.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Lonkar P, Dedon PC: Reactive species and DNA damage in chronic inflammation: reconciling chemical mechanisms and biological fates. Int J Cancer. 2011, 128: 1999-2009. 10.1002/ijc.25815.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Federico A, Morgillo F, Tuccillo C, Ciardiello F, Loguercio C: Chronic inflammation and oxidative stress in human carcinogenesis. Int J Cancer. 2007, 121: 2381-2386. 10.1002/ijc.23192.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Dale DC, Boxer L, Liles WC: The phagocytes: neutrophils and monocytes. Blood. 2008, 112: 935-945. 10.1182/blood-2007-12-077917.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Stiborová M, Rupertová M, Frei E: Cytochrome P450- and peroxidase-mediated oxidation of anticancer alkaloid ellipticine dictates its anti-tumor efficiency. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011, 1814: 175-185. 10.1016/j.bbapap.2010.05.016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Sun Z, Yang P: Role of imbalance between neutrophil elastase and alpha 1-antitrypsin in cancer development and progression. Lancet Oncol. 2004, 5: 182-190. 10.1016/S1470-2045(04)01414-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Sato T, Takahashi S, Mizumoto T, Harao M, Akizuki M, Takasugi M, Fukutomi T, Yamashita J: Neutrophil elastase and cancer. Surg Oncol. 2006, 15: 217-222. 10.1016/j.suronc.2007.01.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Pai SI, Westra WH: Molecular pathology of head and neck cancer: implications for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. Annu Rev Pathol. 2009, 4: 49-70. 10.1146/annurev.pathol.4.110807.092158.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P: Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005, 55: 74-108. 10.3322/canjclin.55.2.74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Taylor CR, Sober AJ: Sun exposure and skin disease. Annu Rev Med. 1996, 47: 181-191. 10.1146/

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Fortina AB, Piaserico S, Caforio AL, Abeni D, Alaibac M, Angelini A, Iliceto S, Peserico A: Immunosuppressive level and other risk factors for basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma in heart transplant recipients. Arch Dermatol. 2004, 140: 1079-1085. 10.1001/archderm.140.9.1079.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Sluyter R, Halliday GM: Infiltration by inflammatory cells required for solar-simulated ultraviolet radiation enhancement of skin tumor growth. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2001, 50: 151-156. 10.1007/PL00006685.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Lee KD, Lee HS, Jeon CH: Body fluid biomarkers for early detection of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Anticancer Res. 2011, 31: 1161-1167.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Roussos ET, Condeelis JS, Patsialou A: Chemotaxis in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011, 11: 573-587. 10.1038/nrc3078.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Pries R, Nitsch S, Wollenberg B: Role of cytokines in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2006, 6: 1195-1203. 10.1586/14737140.6.9.1195.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Reiners JJ, Pavone A, Maldve R, Fischer SM: 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate-mediated systemic co-promotion in the murine skin multistage carcinogenesis protocol. Carcinogenesis. 1993, 14: 411-415. 10.1093/carcin/14.3.411.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Muller-Decker K, Neufang G, Berger I, Neumann M, Marks F, Furstenberger G: Transgenic cyclooxygenase-2 overexpression sensitises mouse skin for carcinogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99: 12483-12488. 10.1073/pnas.192323799.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Blumberg PM: Protein kinase C as the receptor for the phorbol ester tumor promoters: sixth Rhoads memorial award lecture. Cancer Res. 1988, 48: 1-8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Tauber AI: Protein kinase C and the activation of the human neutrophil NADPH-oxidase. Blood. 1987, 69: 711-720.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    De Larco JE, Wuertz BR, Furcht LT: The potential role of neutrophils in promoting the metastatic phenotype of tumors releasing interleukin-8. Clin Cancer Res. 2004, 10: 4895-4900. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0760.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Waugh DJ, Wilson C: The interleukin-8 pathway in cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2008, 14: 6735-6741. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4843.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Franco M, Bustuoabad OD, di Gianni PD, Goldman A, Pasqualini CD, Ruggiero RA: A serum-mediated mechanism for concomitant resistance shared by immunogenic and non-immunogenic murine tumours. Br J Cancer. 1996, 74: 178-186. 10.1038/bjc.1996.335.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Gasparoto TH, Sipert CR, de Oliveira CE, Porto VC, Santos CF, Campanelli AP, Lara VS: Salivary immunity in elderly individuals presented with Candida-related denture stomatitis. Gerodontology. 2012, 47: 741-748.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Ziech D, Franco R, Pappa A, Panayiotidis MI: Reactive oxygen species (ROS)–induced genetic and epigenetic alterations in human carcinogenesis. Mutat Res. 2011, 711: 167-173. 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2011.02.015.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Ohshima H, Tatemichi M, Sawa T: Chemical basis of inflammation-induced carcinogenesis. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2003, 417: 3-11. 10.1016/S0003-9861(03)00283-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Franco R, Schoneveld O, Georgakilas AG, Panayiotidis MI: Oxidative stress, DNA methylation and carcinogenesis. Cancer Lett. 2008, 266: 6-11. 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.02.026.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Ziech D, Franco R, Georgakilas AG, Georgakila S, Malamou-Mitsi V, Schoneveld O, Pappa A, Panayiotidis MI: The role of reactive oxygen species and oxidative stress in environmental carcinogenesis and biomarker development. Chem Biol Interact. 2010, 188: 334339-

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    London SJ, Lehman TA, Taylor JA: Myeloperoxidase genetic polymorphism and lung cancer risk. Cancer Res. 1997, 57: 5001-5003.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Cascorbi I, Henning S, Brockmöller J, Gephart J, Meisel C, Müller JM, Loddenkemper R, Roots I: Substantially reduced risk of cancer of the aerodigestive tract in subjects with variant–463A of the myeloperoxidase gene. Cancer Res. 2009, 60: 644-649.

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Korkmaz B, Horwitz MS, Jenne DE, Gauthier F: Neutrophil elastase, proteinase 3, and cathepsin G as therapeutic targets in human diseases. Pharmacol Rev. 2010, 62: 726-759. 10.1124/pr.110.002733.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Schultz J, Kaminker K: Myeloperoxidase of the leukocyte of normal human blood. I. Content and localization. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1962, 96: 465-467. 10.1016/0003-9861(62)90321-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Klebanoff SJ: Myeloperoxidase: Friend and foe. J Leukoc Biol. 2005, 77: 598-625. 10.1189/jlb.1204697.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Ambrosone CB, Barlow WE, Reynolds W, Livingston RB, Yeh IT, Choi JY, Davis W, Rae JM, Tang L, Hutchins LR, Ravdin PM, Martino S: Myeloperoxidase genotypes and enhanced efficacy of chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer in SWOG-8897. J Clin Oncol. 2009, 27: 4973-4979. 10.1200/JCO.2009.21.8669.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Lanza F, Fietta A, Spisani S, Castoldi GL, Traniello S: Does a relationship exist between neutrophil myeloperoxidase deficiency and the occurrence of neoplasms?. J Clin Lab Immunol. 1987, 22: 175-180.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Lanza F, Giuliani AL, Amelotti F, Spisani S, Traniello S, Castoldi G: Depressed neutrophil-mediated tumor cell cytotoxicity in subjects affected by hereditary myeloperoxidase deficiency and secondary neoplasia. Haematologica. 1998, 73: 355-358.

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Weitzman SA, Gordon LI: Inflammation and cancer: role of phagocyte-generated oxidants in carcinogenesis. Blood. 1990, 76: 655-663.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Liotta LA, Stetler-Stevenson WG: Tumor invasion and metastasis: an imbalance of positive and negative regulation. Cancer Res. 1991, 51: 5054-5059.

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Nakajima M, Chop AM: Tumor invasion and extracellular matrix degradative enzymes: regulation of activity by organ factors. Semin Cancer Biol. 1991, 2: 115-127.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Zeydel M, Nakagawa S, Biempica L, Takahashi S: Collagenase and elastase production by mouse mammary adenocarcinoma primary cultures and cloned cells. Cancer Res. 1986, 46: 6438-6445.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Grant AJ, Lerro KA, Wu CW: Cell associated elastase activities of rat mammary tumour cells. Bioch. Int. 1990, 22: 1077-1084.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Baugh RJ, Travis J: Human leukocyte granule elastase: rapid isolation and characterization. Biochemistry. 1976, 15: 836-841. 10.1021/bi00649a017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Banda MJ, Werb Z: Mouse macrophage elastase. Bioc J. 1981, 193: 589-605.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Karin M, Greten FR: NF-kB: linking inflammation and immunity to cancer development and progression. Nat Rev Immunol. 2005, 5: 749-759. 10.1038/nri1703.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Karin M: Nuclear factor-kB in cancer development and progression. Nature. 2006, 441: 431-436. 10.1038/nature04870.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Naugler WE, Karin M: The wolf in sheep’s clothing: the role of interleukin-6 in immunity, inflammation and cancer. Trends Mol Med. 2008, 14: 109-119. 10.1016/j.molmed.2007.12.007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Hong DS, Angelo LS, Kurzrock R: Interleukin-6 and its receptor in cancer: implications for translational therapeutics. Cancer. 2007, 110: 1911-1928. 10.1002/cncr.22999.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Tomlins C, Storey A: Cutaneous HPV5 E6 causes increased expression of Osteoprotegerin and Interleukin 6 which contribute to evasion of UV-induced apoptosis. Carcinogenesis. 2010, 31: 2155-2164. 10.1093/carcin/bgq200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Jimi E, Furuta H, Matsuo K, Tominaga K, Takahashi T, Nakanishi O: The cellular and molecular mechanisms of bone invasion by oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Dis. 2011, 17: 462-468. 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2010.01781.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Hussain SP, Hofseth LJ, Harris CC: Radical causes of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003, 3: 276-285. 10.1038/nrc1046.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Huang S, Ullrich SE, Bar-Eli M: Regulation of tumor growth and metastasis by interleukin-10: the melanoma experience. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 1999, 19: 697-703. 10.1089/107999099313532.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Kohno T, Mizukami H, Suzuki M, Saga Y, Takei Y, Shimpo M, Matsushita T, Okada T, Hanazono Y, Kume A, Sato I, Ozawa K: Interleukin-10-mediated inhibition of angiogenesis and tumor growth in mice bearing VEGF-producing ovarian cancer. Cancer Res. 2003, 63: 5091-5094.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Lin WW, Karin M: A cytokine-mediated link between innate immunity, inflammation, and cancer. J Clin Invest. 2007, 117: 1175-1183. 10.1172/JCI31537.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Terabe M, Park JM, Berzofsky JA: Role of IL-13 in regulation of anti-tumor immunity and tumor growth. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2004, 53: 79-85. 10.1007/s00262-003-0445-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Teng MW, Darcy PK, Smyth MJ: Stable IL-10: a new therapeutic that promotes tumor immunity. Cancer Cell. 2011, 20: 691-693. 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.11.020.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Asadullah K, Sterry W, Volk HD: Interleukin-10 therapy–review of a new approach. Pharmacol Rev. 2003, 55: 241-269. 10.1124/pr.55.2.4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Cervenak L, Morbidelli L, Donati D, Donnini S, Kambayashi T, Wilson JL, Axelson H, Castaños-Velez E, Ljunggren HG, Malefyt RD, Granger HJ, Ziche M: Abolished angiogenicity and tumorigenicity of Burkitt lymphoma by interleukin-10. Blood. 2000, 96: 2568-2573.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Mumm JB, Emmerich J, Zhang X, Chan I, Wu L, Mauze S, Blaisdell S, Basham B, Dai J, Grein J, Sheppard C, Hong K: IL-10 elicits IFNγ-dependent tumor immune surveillance. Cancer Cell. 2011, 20: 781-796. 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.11.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Alas S, Emmanouilides C, Bonavida B: Inhibition of interleukin 10 by rituximab results in down-regulation of bcl-2 and sensitization of B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma to apoptosis. Clin Cancer Res. 2001, 7: 709-723.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Sredni B, Weil M, Khomenok G, Lebenthal I, Teitz S, Mardor Y, Ram Z, Orenstein A, Kershenovich A, Michowiz S, Cohen YI, Rappaport ZH: Ammonium trichloro(dioxoethylene-o, o’)tellurate (AS101) sensitizes tumors to chemotherapy by inhibiting the tumor interleukin 10 autocrine loop. Cancer Res. 2004, 64: 1843-1852. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-3179.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Alas S, Bonavida B: Rituximab inactivates signal transducer and activation of transcription 3 (STAT3) activity in B-non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma through inhibition of the interleukin 10 autocrine/paracrine loop and results in down-regulation of Bcl-2 and sensitization to cytotoxic drugs. Cancer Res. 2001, 61: 5137-5144.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Brooks DG, Trifilo MJ, Edelmann KH, Teyton L, McGavern DB, Oldstone MB: Interleukin-10 determines viral clearance or persistence in vivo. Nat Med. 2006, 12: 1301-1309. 10.1038/nm1492.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Vicari AP, Trinchieri G: Interleukin-10 in viral diseases and cancer: exiting the labyrinth?. Immunol Rev. 2004, 202: 223-236. 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.00216.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Numasaki M, Fukushi J, Ono M, Narula SK, Zavodny PJ, Kudo T, Robbins PD, Tahara H, Lotze MT: Interleukin-17 promotes angiogenesis and tumor growth. Blood. 2003, 101: 2620-2627. 10.1182/blood-2002-05-1461.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Tian M, Neil JR, Schiemann WP: Transforming growth factor-β and the hallmarks of cancer. Cell Signal. 2011, 23: 951-962. 10.1016/j.cellsig.2010.10.015.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Mohammed J, Ryscavage A, Perez-Lorenzo R, Gunderson AJ, Blazanin N, Glick AB: TGFβ1-induced inflammation in precancerous epidermal squamous lesions requires IL-17. J Invest Dermatol. 2010, 130: 2295-2303. 10.1038/jid.2010.92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Wilke CM, Kryczek I, Wei S, Zhao E, Wu K, Wang G, Zou W: Th17 cells in cancer: help or hindrance?. Carcinogenesis. 2011, 32: 643-649. 10.1093/carcin/bgr019.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Vykhovanets EV, Maclennan GT, Vykhovanets OV, Gupta S: IL-17 Expression by macrophages is associated with proliferative inflammatory atrophy lesions in prostate cancer patients. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2011, 4: 552-565.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Mordue DG, Sibley LD: A novel population of Gr-1+-activated macrophages induced during acute toxoplasmosis. J Leukoc Biol. 2003, 74: 1015-1025. 10.1189/jlb.0403164.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Liu YY, Sun LC, Wei JJ, Li D, Yuan Y, Yan B, Liang ZH, Zhu HF, Xu Y, Li B, Song CW, Liao SJ: Tumor cell-released TLR4 ligands stimulate Gr-1+CD11b+F4/80+ cells to induce apoptosis of activated T cells. J Immunol. 2010, 185: 2773-2782. 10.4049/jimmunol.1000772.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo - FAPESP [grant 2011/03195-1; scholarship to R.N.R. (2006/01617-8), T.H.G. (2009/14127-7), and E.B.B. (2009/03471-9)]; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES; scholarship to C.E.O.), and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq; scholarship to J.S.S., G.P.G, and A.P.C.).

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Paula Campanelli.

Additional information

Competing interests

Authors declare no conflict of interest.

Authors’ contributions

THG had the overall responsibilities of the experiment design and statistical analysis, the concept and wrote the manuscript. CdO carried out chemical induction of squamous cell carcinoma, histological experiments and counting of inflammatory infiltration in the lesions. LTdF carried out chemical induction of squamous cell carcinoma and counting of inflammatory infiltration in the lesions. CRP and RNR carried out chemical induction of squamous cell carcinoma. ALdScarried out histological experiments and counting of inflammatory infiltration in the lesions. GPG, JSdS and APC had shared the concept and supported the manuscript. APC had overall responsibilities of fund management, experimental design and wrote the manuscript. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gasparoto, T.H., de Oliveira, C.E., de Freitas, L.T. et al. Inflammatory events during murine squamous cell carcinoma development. J Inflamm 9, 46 (2012).

Download citation


  • Elastase
  • Nitric oxide
  • Myeloperoxidase
  • Inflammatory cells
  • Cytokines