Skip to main content
Download PDF

Pediatric sepsis inflammatory blood biomarkers that correlate with clinical variables and severity of illness scores

Journal of Inflammation volume 21, Article number: 7 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Sepsis is a dysregulated systemic inflammatory response triggered by infection, resulting in organ dysfunction. A major challenge in clinical pediatrics is to identify sepsis early and then quickly intervene to reduce morbidity and mortality. As blood biomarkers hold promise as early sepsis diagnostic tools, we aimed to measure a large number of blood inflammatory biomarkers from pediatric sepsis patients to determine their predictive ability, as well as their correlations with clinical variables and illness severity scores.

Methods

Pediatric patients that met sepsis criteria were enrolled, and clinical data and blood samples were collected. Fifty-eight inflammatory plasma biomarker concentrations were determined using immunoassays. The data were analyzed with both conventional statistics and machine learning.

Results

Twenty sepsis patients were enrolled (median age 13 years), with infectious pathogens identified in 75%. Vasopressors were administered to 85% of patients, while 55% received invasive ventilation and 20% were ventilated non-invasively. A total of 24 inflammatory biomarkers were significantly different between sepsis patients and age/sex-matched healthy controls. Nine biomarkers (IL-6, IL-8, MCP-1, M-CSF, IL-1RA, hyaluronan, HSP70, MMP3, and MMP10) yielded AUC parameters > 0.9 (95% CIs: 0.837-1.000; p < 0.001). Boruta feature reduction yielded 6 critical biomarkers with their relative importance: IL-8 (12.2%), MCP-1 (11.6%), HSP70 (11.6%), hyaluronan (11.5%), M-CSF (11.5%), and IL-6 (11.5%); combinations of 2 biomarkers yielded AUC values of 1.00 (95% CI: 1.00–1.00; p < 0.001). Specific biomarkers strongly correlated with illness severity scoring, as well as other clinical variables. IL-3 specifically distinguished bacterial versus viral infection (p < 0.005).

Conclusions

Specific inflammatory biomarkers were identified as markers of pediatric sepsis and strongly correlated to both clinical variables and sepsis severity.

Introduction

Sepsis is a dysregulated systemic inflammatory response triggered by an infection that results in biochemical, physiological, and pathological abnormalities throughout the body, including organ dysfunction [1]. One of the challenges in clinical pediatrics is identifying sepsis, particularly in infants and young children [2]. The ability to efficiently recognize and stratify the severity of sepsis is essential, as it remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the pediatric population [3].

At the time of initial presentation, it can be challenging to identify which children will go on to develop sepsis based on their early clinical features. Indeed, approximately 12% of well-appearing febrile infants have potentially life-threatening serious bacterial infections [4]. Not only can sepsis have negative and devastating consequences for patients, but it remains a significant burden to the healthcare system. In fact, it has been estimated that sepsis treatment in the United States healthcare system costs more than 20 billion dollars annually [5].

Biomarkers are measurable compounds in the body that reflect physiologic states or pathologic processes. A diagnostic test for sepsis that uses novel biomarkers in combination with or without clinical signs would contribute to prompt and appropriate targeting of monitoring and treatment for children at the highest risk [6]. To be effective, compounds measured as biomarkers should be sensitive, accurate, and reproducible [7]. To date, only CRP [8] and procalcitonin [9] are helpful markers of infection and inflammation. Inflammatory biomarkers, such as IL-10, MCP-1, TNF-α, and others, have been implicated in the early development of sepsis but have not been well investigated [7]. Rather than endeavoring to identify one biomarker that will prove reliable in all clinical scenarios to diagnose sepsis, research suggests that the use of several biomarkers in tandem may be more sensitive and specific than a single biomarker [10].

In this study, we performed immunoassays to measure 58 blood inflammatory biomarkers from pediatric sepsis patients and age- and sex-matched healthy control subjects, followed by data analyses with both conventional statistics and machine learning. Our specific objectives were: (1) to measure the plasma levels of biomarkers known to be implicated in sepsis in critically ill children admitted to a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU); (2) to compare those same biomarkers with healthy age- and sex-matched control subjects; (3) to determine how biomarker levels vary over two days in the PICU; and (4) to correlate biomarker concentrations with clinically relevant variables.

Methods

Study participants and blood sampling

Consent for research was obtained from the legal guardians of pediatric patients. Patients who met pediatric sepsis criteria were enrolled. Blood was drawn only when clinically required, using citrate as an anticoagulant. Patient characteristics included age, sex, comorbidities, pathogen, source of infection, chest x-ray, mechanical ventilation, hemodynamic support, number of PICU days, and total number of hospital days. Illness severity scores were calculated, including the Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM III) score, the Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 (PIM 2) score, the daily Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction 2 (PELOD-2) score, and the Glasgow Coma scale (GCS). For comparison with sepsis patients, age- and sex-matched healthy control subjects without disease or acute illness were identified from the Translational Research Centre, London, Ontario (www.translationalresearch.ca) [11, 12]. To obtain the plasma, the blood was centrifuged at 1500 × g for 15 min at 4oC. Samples were then frozen and stored at − 80 °C before thawing on ice for experimental use.

Plasma immunoassays

Analyte concentrations of 58 inflammatory analytes were determined using either multiplexed biomarker immunoassay kits according to manufacturers’ instructions (MilliporeSigma, 400 Summit Drive, Burlington, MA) or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). For the former, plasma inflammatory analytes were measured using a Bio-PlexTM 200 Suspension Array system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA), which used Luminex xMAPTM fluorescent bead-based technology (Luminex Corp., Austin, TX). Bioanalyte concentrations were calculated from standard curves using five-parameter logistic regression in Bio Plex Manager 6.1 software. For the latter, the biomarkers measured with ELISA include: syndecan-1 (1:2 dilution; ab46506, Abcam, Cambridge, UK); heparin sulfate (1:10 dilution; HU8718, Biotang Inc., Lexington, MA); chondroitin sulfate (1:2 or 1:50 dilution; HU8720, Biotang Inc.); and hyaluronan (1:8 dilution; DHAYL0, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). Plasma samples were assessed in duplicate, and where sample optical densities (ODs) were above the range of the plate reader, concentrations were estimated by substituting the highest OD value of the plate reader. Plasma biomarker data are presented as pg/mL.

Conventional statistics

Medians with interquartile ranges (IQRs) and frequency (%) were used to report PICU patient baseline characteristics for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Group differences for continuous and categorical variables were examined with Mann-Whitney U tests (or Kruskal Wallis tests, as appropriate) and chi-square tests, respectively. Differences between sepsis patients on PICU Day-1 and Day-2 were examined with Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were estimated for individual analytes to predict sepsis status in comparison to healthy control subjects [13]. Area-under-the-curve (AUC) was calculated as an aggregate measure of analyte performance across all possible classification thresholds, with AUC > 0.7 considered acceptable [14]. Analyte combinations were calculated through logistic regression models with sepsis status as the outcome and representative analytes as the included predictors; the predicted values from the regression models were then saved for use in ROC curve analyses. All analyses were conducted using SPSS version 28 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Heat maps depicting Pearson correlation values between analytes and clinical or biochemical parameters were created in R (http://www.r-project.org) using the ggplot2 version 3.3.3 package. Statistical significance was set at a p-value < 0.01.

Machine learning

For machine learning, a Random Forest classifier based on decision trees was used to classify the sepsis cohort in comparison to the healthy control subjects by their biomarker concentrations. The Boruta feature reduction algorithm was used to identify the most important biomarkers for classifying sepsis [15]. The Boruta algorithm is based on Random Forest classifiers and compares the original biomarker dataset to randomly rearranged versions to determine if a biomarker is better at classifying than chance. The biomarker data were then visualized with a nonlinear dimensionality reduction on the reduced dataset using the t-distributed stochastic nearest neighbor embedding (t-SNE) algorithm. t-SNE assumes that the ‘optimal’ representation of the data lies on a manifold with complex geometry but a low dimension, embedded in the full-dimensional space of the raw data [16].

Results

Two age- and sex-matched groups of 20 pediatric patients were enrolled in the study, including a group of pediatric patients with sepsis (median age = 13 years) and a group of healthy control subjects (Table 1). Plasma samples were collected from pediatric sepsis patients on days one and two of admission to the PICU. Only 13 sepsis patients remained in the PICU on Day-2. Baseline characteristics of these patients, including PRISMIII score, PIM2 score, daily PELOD-2 score, GCS, comorbidities, and infection data, are found in Table 1. Vasopressors were administered to 17 of the 20 patients (85%); 11 patients (55%) received invasive ventilation by intubation or tracheotomy; and 4 patients (20%) were ventilated non-invasively by BiPAP, CPAP, or high-flow nasal cannula.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of 20 pediatric sepsis patients
Full size table

A total of 58 plasma protein biomarkers were measured using immunoassays, with 24 being statistically significantly different between the two cohorts (Table 2). Medians and IQRs for these biomarkers are shown in descending order of significance and are represented in pg/mL. Most biomarkers had significant elevations in concentration on PICU Day-1 when compared to the healthy controls (n = 21/24; p < 0.01), with only 3 biomarkers decreased in sepsis patients (RANTES, MMP9, and MMP2). A total of 34 of the measured plasma proteins did not reach statistical significance (Supplementary Table 1).

Table 2 Statistically significant plasma biomarker measurements
Full size table

The statistically significant biomarkers measured on PICU Day-1 were first assessed individually to identify their utility as standalone markers of sepsis. ROC curve analyses were performed on the statistically significant biomarkers with AUCs shown in Table 3. AUC values > 0.8 are considered “good”, while values > 0.9 are considered “outstanding” [17]. Nine biomarkers (IL-6, HSP70, MMP3, MCP-1, Hyaluronan, M-CSF, IL-1RA, MMP10, and IL-8) yielded AUC parameters > 0.9 with 95% CIs ranging from 0.84 to 1.00. The p-values for these biomarkers were all < 0.001.

Table 3 Receiver operating curve analyses for predicting PICU day-1 sepsis
Full size table

Machine learning was employed to review the statistically significant biomarkers (as measured on PICU Day-1 and Day-2). The Boruta feature reduction of the leading analytes reduced the number of statistically significant biomarkers to those that were most important (see Fig. 1). On PICU Day-1, of the biomarkers outlined in Table 3, six yielded a biomarker importance in a combined model of > 10%. In descending order, these were IL-8 (12.2%), MCP-1 (11.6%), HSP70 (11.6%), hyaluronan (11.5%), M-CSF (11.5%), and IL-6 (11.5%). On PICU Day-2, the markers shifted, with MCP-1 showing the highest importance (13.7%), followed by IL-18 (12.7%), MMP10 (12.7%), IL-6 (12.4%), M-CSF (12.4%), HSP70 (12.3%), and MMP7 (12.0%), all yielding importance > 10%. Using the combinations of biomarkers in Figs. 1A and C, tSNE plots were constructed (Figs. 1B and D). For PICU Day-1 and Day-2, the tSNE plots showed a clear distinction between the patients with sepsis and the healthy control subjects.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Importance of plasma biomarkers for identifying sepsis on PICUDays 1 and 2. (A) Boruta feature reduction reveals the importance of 15 plasma biomarkers for distinguishing sepsis on PICU Day-1. (B) Subjects plotted in two dimensions, following t-SNE dimensionality reduction of all 15 significant biomarkers, show distinct separation and clustering of sepsis patients on PICU Day-1 versus age- and sex-matched healthy control subjects. (C) Boruta feature reduction reveals the importance of 11 plasma biomarkers for distinguishing sepsis on PICU Day-2. (D) Subjects plotted in two dimensions, following t-SNE dimensionality reduction of all 11 significant biomarkers, show distinct separation and clustering of sepsis patients on PICU Day-2 versus age- and sex-matched healthy control subjects.

Full size image

The aforementioned top biomarkers were used in tandem to identify those that could yield AUC parameters even greater than those outlined in Table 3. For combinations of biomarkers on PICU Day-1, the ROC curve analyses are listed in Table 4. Five combinations yielded AUC values of 1.00 (95% CI: 1.00–1.00, p < 0.001) and included IL-8 with IL-6, MCP-1 with HSP70, MCP-1 with IL-6, HSP70 with Hyaluronan, and Hyaluronan with IL-6.

Table 4 ROC analyses of biomarker combinations on PICU day-1 sepsis
Full size table

Statistically significant sepsis biomarkers on PICU Day-1 were correlated with clinically significant variables and severity scores (Fig. 2). Only biomarkers with at least one clinically significant correlation are shown (a total of 22 biomarkers). Age and male sex were negatively correlated with MMP7. Multiple biomarkers demonstrated strong positive correlations with PRISM III and PELOD-2 scores, including G-CSF, IL-1RA, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, MCP-1, M-CSF, MIP-1β, and hyaluronan. In contrast, PIM 2 scores shared positive correlations selectively with MMPs, including MMP3, MMP1, and MMP10. GCS was negatively correlated with G-CSF, IL-6, IL-8, and MCSF. MMP2 negatively correlated, and MMP8 positively correlated, with respiratory-associated variables. HSP70 was negatively correlated with inotrope requirements. PICU stay was positively correlated with elastase 2, NGAL, and MIG, whereas hospital stay was correlated with IL-18, MCP-1, hyaluronan, and MIG.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Significant correlations between PICU Day-1 plasma biomarkers and clinical variables/illness severity scores. Biomarker concentrations on the y-axis correlated with clinical variables and illness severity scores. Abn CXR reflects any infiltrate identified in either lung field on chest x-ray. Resp Source refers to any infectious pathogen identified in the nasopharynx or by respiratory culture. Invasive MV refers to any patient requiring mechanical ventilation via either an endotracheal tube or tracheostomy. LOS refers to the number of days in either the PICU or hospital. * p < 0.05

Full size image

A total of seven plasma biomarkers significantly changed over the first 48 h of PICU admission, with all decreasing on PICU Day-2 (Fig. 3). IL-1RA was the most recovered from its peak elevation on PICU Day-1 (p < 0.01), while IL-6, IL-8, Il-10, M-CSF, MMP1, and Resistin had moderately recovered from their peaks (p < 0.05).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Plasma biomarkers showed significant recovery on PICU Day-2 from their initial peak elevations. Seven plasma biomarkers that were significantly elevated on PICU Day-1 from control levels were significantly decreased by PICU Day-2. Only 13 patients were included for paired analyses and to account for PICU Day-2 discharges where samples were not obtained. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01

Full size image

We investigated whether any biomarkers could distinguish between pathogens. Interestingly, IL-3 was not statistically significant between all sepsis patients and healthy control subjects (p = 0.428; Supplementary Table 1). However, when plasma IL-3 concentrations from sepsis patients were compared between patients with bacterial (median = 0.00 pg/mL; n = 11) versus viral (median = 1.30 pg/mL; n = 3) infections, statistical significance was observed (p < 0.005).

Discussion

In this study, we evaluated the plasma protein concentrations of 58 biomarkers in 20 pediatric sepsis patients admitted to the PICU and compared their biomarker levels to those of 20 age- and sex-matched healthy control subjects. Multiple plasma biomarkers were significantly increased in sepsis patients, with nine biomarkers yielding AUC values of > 0.9 on their respective ROC curves. Moreover, combinations of these biomarkers yielded AUC values of 1.00, with five combinations reaching this parameter: IL-8 & IL-6; MCP-1 & HSP70; MCP-1 & IL-6; HSP70 & Hyaluronan; and Hyaluronan & IL-6. Lastly, many biomarkers were correlated with clinical variables and severity of illness scores, suggesting prognostic utility.

Our patients were similar to other pediatric sepsis studies in demographics, illness severity, and clinical interventions [18, 19]. The inciting pathogens were variable, including bacterial, viral, and fungal, with a primary respiratory source. Systemic inflammation and immune dysfunction are characteristic features of pediatric sepsis [20]. A pro-inflammatory stage occurs early, characterized by the recruitment of leukocytes to infected tissues [21]. Once activated, the recruited cells secrete additional pro-inflammatory cytokines [22], chemokines [23], and reactive oxygen species [24]. Local accumulation of these proinflammatory mediators likely instigates microvascular endothelial injury and glycocalyx shedding (e.g., hyaluronan) [25, 26].

Conventional statistical techniques identified 24 plasma biomarkers that were significantly different in sepsis patients from controls. The majority of elevated biomarkers were either pro-inflammatory cytokines [27, 28] or MMPs [29], zinc-containing endopeptidases capable of degrading extracellular matrix proteins and processing bioactive molecules [30]. While 21 biomarkers increased in sepsis, 3 biomarkers decreased from control levels (RANTES, MMP9, and MMP2). Decreased RANTES (or CCL5), a chemokine that regulates CD8 T-cell responses during viral infection, was also depressed from baseline levels in both neonatal and pediatric sepsis [28, 31]. The expression of several plasma MMPs is altered by sepsis in adults, with elevated MMP9 and depressed MMP2 [32]. The depressed MMP9 measured in pediatric sepsis [33] may represent antibody specificity to latent versus active forms or reflect age-dependent differential sepsis responses.

Using machine learning, six biomarkers (MCP-1, M-CSF, IL-6, MMP3, MMP10, and MMP7) were identified that shared high importance between both groups (PICU Day-1 and PICU Day-2) and may be useful for future studies evaluating biomarkers in pediatric sepsis patients who present later in their course of illness than those captured within this study.

The five biomarker combinations that yielded AUC values of 1.00, are individually known to be associated with sepsis and inflammation. IL-6 is an early pro-inflammatory cytokine that induces the synthesis of acute-phase proteins, stimulates antibody production, affects T-cell development, and promotes the differentiation of non-immune cells [34]. IL-8 and MCP-1 are chemokines that recruit leukocytes [35, 36]. Hyaluronan is a constituent of the microvascular glycocalyx [26] and, in response to inflammatory cytokines, is catalyzed into fragments that promote further inflammation [37]. Unlike proteins involved in inflammatory cascades, HSP70 is released by active secretion or during lysis by necrotic cell death, and its levels are often variable in oxidant states. In addition, HSP70 levels correlate with sepsis mortality [38].

We identified multiple sepsis biomarkers that correlated with clinically significant variables. MMP7, an enzyme that degrades the extracellular matrix [32], was negatively correlated with age and male sex, making this biomarker more likely to be present in pediatric sepsis patients who are young and female. MMP8, a neutrophil collagenase, is positively correlated with a respiratory source of infection [39]. The presence of MMP2 is negatively correlated with having an abnormal finding on a chest x-ray, as well as the need for invasive mechanical ventilation [40]. These findings suggest that patients with higher levels of this biomarker are less likely to have an abnormal chest x-ray and less likely to require invasive mechanical ventilation while hospitalized. Additionally, the presence of HSP70 was negatively correlated with the need for inotropic medication, suggesting that patients with increased HSP70 will have overall greater hemodynamic stability throughout their illness course [41].

Multiple biomarkers infer utility in predicting illness severity when matched to established illness severity scores. The biomarkers with the strongest illness severity correlations were G-CSF, M-CSF, and IL-8. These three biomarkers were each positively correlated with PRISM III scores, initial PELOD-2 scores, and the highest measured PELOD-2 scores. In keeping with their role as sepsis severity biomarkers, each of these biomarkers negatively correlated with GCS on admission. As for other markers of sepsis severity, MMP1, MMP3 [42], and MMP10 were all positively correlated with PIM-2, a score that predicts the risk of death for pediatric patients admitted to intensive care. Given biomarker changes that significantly correlate with illness severity, these biomarkers might be useful for sepsis prognosis.

Biomarkers correlating with PICU length of stay and overall hospital length of stay were also identified. Elastase 2, NGAL, and MIG positively correlated with PICU length of stay, whereas hyaluronan and MIG positively correlated with hospital length of stay. Elastase 2 and NGAL are released by activated neutrophils, MIG is a T-cell lymphocyte chemokine, and hyaluronan is cleaved from the microvascular endothelial glycocalyx. These biomarkers may represent a severe host-pathogen response as well as a prolonged recovery process.

Importantly, IL-3 was noted to be increased in pediatric patients who had a viral agent identified rather than a bacterial infection. IL-3 is produced by activated T-cells and increases innate antiviral immunity by promoting the recruitment of circulating plasma dendritic cells [43]. IL-3 may help distinguish which sepsis patients require antibiotic versus antiviral coverage and aid antimicrobial stewardship.

The importance of this study is highlighted by the number of blood biomarkers measured, together with advanced analytics. Indeed, recent pediatric sepsis biomarker studies focused on only a few biomarkers analyzed with conventional statistics [44,45,46,47]. The machine learning incorporated herein identified the biomarker importance for determining sepsis. We have also taken a novel approach to identify combinations of biomarkers that, when used together, yield potential utility in predicting sepsis severity.

The clinical relevance of this study is two-fold: first, identification of biomarker combinations may aid earlier recognition of sepsis in children; and second, the biomarker(s) that correlate with clinical variables and illness severity may aid prognostication. Quantitative laboratory and semi-quantitative point-of-care immunoassays could be constructed to measure multiple biomarkers identified here for early sepsis diagnosis, including multiplex, lateral flow, and chip assays. Future studies, using targeted proteomics and machine learning, should measure the plasma proteome in pediatric sepsis to identify novel biomarkers not yet considered, as has been done for adult sepsis [48].

Our study identified combinations of plasma biomarkers that act as significant markers of sepsis. Individually, the identified sepsis biomarkers share commonalities with other inflammatory conditions, including diabetic ketoacidosis [49, 50], trauma [51], and ischemic injury [52]. In contrast, biomarker combinations hold value for disease specificity and may allow for the distinction of sepsis from other inflammatory states, such as those listed above. Nonetheless, several limitations of our study are worthy of discussion. First, our study includes a limited sample size and was conducted at a single center. Despite this, the data yielded robust results even while using conservative statistical methods. Second, the pathogens were variable, with the majority suffering from bacterial illness as compared to viral pathogens [53]. Nonetheless, bacterial infections are amenable to antibiotic treatment, and early recognition and intervention are critical to improving outcomes [53]. Also, IL-3 seemed to distinguish bacterial from viral infections, thereby requiring further study. Despite these caveats, our exploratory data are important for future hypothesis-driven studies in larger populations.

Conclusion

Our data have shown that elevated levels of certain biomarkers (specifically the combinations of IL-8 & IL-6, MCP-1 & HSP70, MCP-1 & IL-6, HSP70 & hyaluronan, and hyaluronan & IL-6) are potential markers of pediatric sepsis, and that elevations in certain biomarkers were correlated with clinical variables and illness severity measurements. These biomarkers are known to play a role in the mechanism of sepsis development [34,35,36,37,38]. As such, the combinations of these biomarkers that have been identified as significant by this study should be further investigated to identify their utility in specifically indicating the development of sepsis in pediatric patients versus other conditions causing inflammation. Furthermore, these biomarkers may also serve as a guide in clinical decision-making, and their early detection may eventually lead to improved outcomes in pediatric patients with sepsis.

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Singer M, et al. The Third International Consensus definitions for Sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315:801–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Milcent K, Gajdos V. Use of procalcitonin assays to predict serious bacterial infection in Young Febrile infants-reply. JAMA Pediatr. 2016;170:623–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pontrelli G, et al. Diagnostic value of soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells in paediatric sepsis: a systematic review. Ital J Pediatr. 2016;42:44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Aronson PL, et al. Variation in care of the febrile young infant < 90 days in US pediatric emergency departments. Pediatrics. 2014;134:667–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim MH, Choi JH. An update on Sepsis biomarkers. Infect Chemother. 2020;52:1–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Quadir AF, Britton PN. Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein as biomarkers for neonatal bacterial infection. J Paediatr Child Health. 2018;54:695–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Barichello T, Generoso JS, Singer M, Dal-Pizzol F. Biomarkers for sepsis: more than just fever and leukocytosis-a narrative review. Crit Care. 2022;26:14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Gabay C, Kushner I. Acute-phase proteins and other systemic responses to inflammation. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:448–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gomez B, et al. Diagnostic value of procalcitonin in well-appearing young febrile infants. Pediatrics. 2012;130:815–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Biron BM, Ayala A, Lomas-Neira JL. Biomarkers for Sepsis: what is and what might be? Biomark Insights. 2015;10:7–17.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Gillio-Meina C, Cepinskas G, Cecchini EL, Fraser DD. Translational research in pediatrics II: blood collection, processing, shipping, and storage. Pediatrics. 2013;131:754–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Brisson AR, Matsui D, Rieder MJ, Fraser DD. Translational research in pediatrics: tissue sampling and biobanking. Pediatrics. 2012;129:153–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hajian-Tilaki K. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for medical diagnostic test evaluation. Casp J Intern Med. 2013;4:627–35.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhu W, Zeng N, Wang N. (2010) Sensitivity, Specificity, Accuracy, Associated Confidence Interval and ROC Analysis with Practical SAS® Implementations. Northeast SAS Users Group Proceedings http://www.lexjansen.com/nesug/nesug10/hl/hl07.pdf.

  15. Kursa MB, Rudnicki WR. Feature selection with the Boruta package. J Stat Softw. 2010;36:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Van der Maaten L, Hinton G. (2008) Visualizing data using t-SNE. J Mach Learn Res 9.

  17. Hosmer DW Jr, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant RX. Applied logistic regression. Wiley; 2013.

  18. Zurek J, Vavrina M. Procalcitonin Biomarker kinetics to predict Multiorgan Dysfunction Syndrome in Children with Sepsis and systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Iran J Pediatr. 2015;25:e324.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Han YY, Doughty LA, Kofos D, Sasser H, Carcillo JA. Procalcitonin is persistently increased among children with poor outcome from bacterial sepsis*. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2003;4:21–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bline KE, et al. Novel identification of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in children with septic shock. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2022;23:e555–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bhan C, Dipankar P, Chakraborty P, Sarangi PP. Role of cellular events in the pathophysiology of sepsis. Inflamm Res. 2016;65:853–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Smart L, et al. Endothelial glycocalyx biomarkers increase in patients with infection during Emergency Department treatment. J Crit Care. 2017;42:304–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nowak JE, Wheeler DS, Harmon KK, Wong HR. Admission chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 4 levels predict survival in pediatric septic shock. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2010;11:213–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Kolarova H, Ambruzova B, Svihalkova Sindlerova L, Klinke A, Kubala L. (2014) Modulation of endothelial glycocalyx structure under inflammatory conditions. Mediators Inflamm 2014:694312.

  25. Dogne S, Flamion B. Endothelial glycocalyx impairment in Disease: Focus on Hyaluronan Shedding. Am J Pathol. 2020;190:768–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Patterson EK, Cepinskas G, Fraser DD. Endothelial glycocalyx degradation in critical illness and Injury. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;9:898592.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Angurana SK, Bansal A, Muralidharan J, Aggarwal R, Singhi S. Cytokine levels in critically Ill Children with severe Sepsis and their relation with the severity of illness and mortality. J Intensive Care Med. 2021;36:576–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Frimpong A, et al. Cytokines as potential biomarkers for Differential diagnosis of Sepsis and other Non-septic Disease conditions. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;12:901433.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Wong HR, et al. The pediatric sepsis biomarker risk model. Crit Care. 2012;16:R174.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. de Almeida LGN, et al. Matrix metalloproteinases: from Molecular mechanisms to Physiology, Pathophysiology, and Pharmacology. Pharmacol Rev. 2022;74:712–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Fahmy EM, et al. Assessment of Interleukin-27 and chemokine RANTES as biomarkers for early onset neonatal Sepsis. Egypt J Immunol. 2020;27:9–18.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Yazdan-Ashoori P, et al. Elevated plasma matrix metalloproteinases and their tissue inhibitors in patients with severe sepsis. J Crit Care. 2011;26:556–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Alqahtani MF, et al. Evaluation of new diagnostic biomarkers in Pediatric Sepsis: Matrix Metalloproteinase-9, tissue inhibitor of Metalloproteinase-1, mid-regional pro-atrial natriuretic peptide, and adipocyte fatty-acid binding protein. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0153645.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Tanaka T, Narazaki M, Kishimoto T. IL-6 in inflammation, immunity, and disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2014;6:a016295.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Baggiolini M, Clark-Lewis I. Interleukin-8, a chemotactic and inflammatory cytokine. FEBS Lett. 1992;307:97–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Singh S, Anshita D, Ravichandiran V. MCP-1: function, regulation, and involvement in disease. Int Immunopharmacol. 2021;101:107598.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Kobayashi T, Chanmee T, Itano N. (2020) Hyaluronan: Metabolism and Function. Biomolecules 10.

  38. Gelain DP, et al. Serum heat shock protein 70 levels, oxidant status, and mortality in sepsis. Shock. 2011;35:466–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Brand KH, et al. Use of MMP-8 and MMP-9 to assess disease severity in children with viral lower respiratory tract infections. J Med Virol. 2012;84:1471–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. C, DA-M, et al. MMP-2 and MMP-9 levels in plasma are altered and associated with mortality in COVID-19 patients. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021;142:112067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Bruemmer-Smith S, Stuber F, Schroeder S. Protective functions of intracellular heat-shock protein (HSP) 70-expression in patients with severe sepsis. Intensive Care Med. 2001;27:1835–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Jones TK, et al. Elevated plasma levels of Matrix Metalloproteinase-3 and tissue-inhibitor of Matrix Metalloproteinases-1 associate with Organ Dysfunction and Mortality in Sepsis. Shock. 2022;57:41–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Benard A, et al. Interleukin-3 protects against viral pneumonia in sepsis by enhancing plasmacytoid dendritic cell recruitment into the lungs and T cell priming. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1140630.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Stocker M, et al. Procalcitonin-guided decision making for duration of antibiotic therapy in neonates with suspected early-onset sepsis: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial (NeoPIns). Lancet. 2017;390:871–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Jacobs L, et al. The Pediatric Sepsis Biomarker Risk Model (PERSEVERE) biomarkers predict clinical deterioration and mortality in Immunocompromised Children evaluated for infection. Sci Rep. 2019;9:424.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Ayar G, Atmaca YM, Alisik M, Erel O. Effects of paraoxonase, arylesterase, ceruloplasmin, catalase, and myeloperoxidase activities on prognosis in pediatric patients with sepsis. Clin Biochem. 2017;50:414–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Bolia R, Srivastava A, Marak R, Yachha SK, Poddar U. Role of Procalcitonin and C-Reactive protein as biomarkers of infection in Children with Liver Disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2016;63:406–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Van Nynatten LR, et al. Novel plasma protein biomarkers from critically ill sepsis patients. Clin Proteom. 2022;19:50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Close TE, et al. Diabetic ketoacidosis elicits systemic inflammation associated with cerebrovascular endothelial cell dysfunction. Microcirculation. 2013;20:534–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Omatsu T, et al. CXCL1/CXCL8 (GROalpha/IL-8) in human diabetic ketoacidosis plasma facilitates leukocyte recruitment to cerebrovascular endothelium in vitro. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2014;306:E1077–1084.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Rahbar E, et al. Endothelial glycocalyx shedding and vascular permeability in severely injured trauma patients. J Transl Med. 2015;13:117.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. van Golen RF, et al. The mechanisms and physiological relevance of glycocalyx degradation in hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2014;21:1098–118.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Nascimento-Carvalho AC, Ruuskanen O, Nascimento-Carvalho CM. Comparison of the frequency of bacterial and viral infections among children with community-acquired pneumonia hospitalized across distinct severity categories: a prospective cross-sectional study. BMC Pediatr. 2016;16:105.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the front-line health care providers whom assisted with collection of blood samples from acutely ill sepsis patients.

Funding

DDF received study funding from the London Health Sciences Foundation (https://lhsf.ca/), the London Community Foundation and the AMOSO Innovation Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Pediatrics, Western University, London, ON, Canada

    Sean Leonard, Hailey Guertin, Michael R. Miller & Douglas D. Fraser

  2. Emergency Medicine, Lakeridge Health, Ajax/Oshawa, ON, Canada

    Natalya Odoardi

  3. Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, ON, Canada

    Maitray A. Patel & Mark Daley

  4. Computer Science, Western University, London, ON, Canada

    Mark Daley

  5. Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, ON, Canada

    Gediminas Cepinskas

  6. Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada

    Gediminas Cepinskas & Douglas D. Fraser

  7. Clinical Neurological Sciences, Western University, London, ON, Canada

    Douglas D. Fraser

  8. Physiology & Pharmacology, Western University, London, ON, Canada

    Douglas D. Fraser

  9. Room C2-C82, London Health Sciences Centre, 800 Commissioners Road East, London, ON, N6A 5W9, Canada

    Douglas D. Fraser

Authors
  1. Sean Leonard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hailey Guertin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Natalya Odoardi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michael R. Miller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Maitray A. Patel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mark Daley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Gediminas Cepinskas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Douglas D. Fraser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

DDF conceived and designed the study. DDF, SL, HG, NO and GC collected human samples and clinical data. DDF, MRM, MAP, MD, and GC analyzed all data. LS and DDF wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Douglas D. Fraser.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975. The study was reviewed and approved by the Western University, Human Research Ethics Board (HREB #s 6970; #100036; # 6963).

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Leonard, S., Guertin, H., Odoardi, N. et al. Pediatric sepsis inflammatory blood biomarkers that correlate with clinical variables and severity of illness scores. J Inflamm 21, 7 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12950-024-00379-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12950-024-00379-w

Keywords

Journal of Inflammation

ISSN: 1476-9255

Contact us