Microglia differentiation using a culture system for the expansion of mice non-adherent bone marrow stem cells
© Hinze and Stolzing; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 24 August 2011
Accepted: 2 April 2012
Published: 2 April 2012
Studying primary adult microglia is hampered because of the difficult isolation procedure and the low cell yield. We therefore established a differentiation protocol using a culture system developed for the expansion of non-adherent bone marrow cells.
Non-adherent bone marrow derived stem cells (NA-BMC) are derived by selective adhesion (‘preplating’) and are non adhesive adult stem cells. We investigated the changes in bone marrow cell populations by this repeated selective adhesion and compared the potential of the derived cells to differentiate towards microglia. Cells were differentiated with astrocyte conditioned medium (ACM) and granulocyte-monocyte colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF).
NA-BMC cultures show a steep raise in the fraction of stem cells during the cultivation time and the differentiation potential is of the same quality as established protocols. Around 70% of the cells are microglia defined as being positive for CD11b/CD45 and show phagocytosis activity and oxidative bursts.
The non-adherent cell system has the advantage that is produces stem cell progenitors during expansion and provides good microglial differentiation.
KeywordsNon-adherent stem cells Bone marrow Microglia Differentiation
Microglia are the immune-cells of the brain. They react to inflammatory signals, seek out and phagocytize debris, promote repair and regeneration by excreting growth factors . Microglia might, however, promote neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer or multiple sclerosis by dysregulation and overreaction to chronic inflammatory signals. A suspected loss of their ability to function as debris clearing cells with age or an insufficient renewal of their population in age was described . The role microglia play in these diseases and the possible changes the microglia population undergoes with age are the key to understand and combat the causes of neurodegeneration.
Studies of microglia in vitro use mostly primary microglia from mouse or rat embryos. Human microglia are difficult to obtain and they are often derived from post-mortem donors, posing some extra difficulties concerning cell viability. To study the role of microglia in neurodegeneration it is however necessary to work with adult material as the onset of the disease is age-dependent. The alternative is to use blood or bone marrow derived monocytes to derive microglia . The in vitro generation of microglia may chart the way towards new therapeutic strategies using adult stem cells or to study the function of microglia generated from individuals of all ages and from diseased background to better understand their role in neurodegeneration.
Non-adherent bone marrow cells (NA-BMCs) harbor cells of the hematopoietic lineage . NA-BMCs are known to rescue lethally irradiated mice [3, 4]. Their potential to give rise to microglia could be of use in cell-based therapies of the central nervous system (CNS) . Non-adherent mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) are present in NA-BMC cultures as well . They give rise to fibroblastic, osteoblastic, chondrocytic and adipocytic lineages. They have been found to colonize various tissues like bone marrow, spleen, intestine, kidney and liver.
NA-BMCs might correspond to a naturally circulating population of cells , which carries progenitors of several somatic cell types. In line with this, cells residing in the blood have been differentiated to various cell types  and it is known that peripheral blood monocytes can be differentiated to microglia in vitro . Also, fibroblast-like cells are mobilized from the bone marrow by various effects like cytokines, hypoxia and skin damage [7–10].
MSC are known to regulate microglia and other immune cells [11–14]. Bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells transplanted into the brain result in a reduction of amyloid-ß plaques  - possibly by activation of resident microglia to an amoeboid and phagocytic state. Transplanted MSC have positive effects in neurodegeneration by regulation of the microenvironment and by cell fusion [16, 17]. MSC regulate activation of microglia in co-culture [18, 19]. These findings suggest that inclusion of MSC in a microglia cell population might even be beneficial.
Materials and methods
Animals used for the experiments were C57BL/6 from the MEZ Leipzig and Charles River (Sulzfeld, Germany). They were handled in accordance to local animal ethics regulations.
Bone marrow isolation and culture of NA-BMC
Femurae and tibiae of 2–3 month old C57BL/6 mice were isolated, opened and centrifuged to obtain bone marrow. 107 bone marrow cells were cultivated for 24 h in a 60 mm petri dish and in 10 ml Dulbecco’s modified eagle medium (low glucose) (DMEM, Hyclone Laboratories Inc.), supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) (Invitrogen), 10-8 M dexamethasone and 100 units/ml Penicillin/Streptomycin (Invitrogen). After 24 h the non-adherent cells were flushed off and transferred to a new dish (protocol 2; Figure 1). This 24 h adhesion period was repeated 4 times to derive NA-BMC cells (protocol 1; Figure 1).
The non-adherent cells of day 1 (classical replating protocol to derive macrophages, protocol 2) and NA-BMCs from day 4 (protocol 1) were resuspended in 5 ml osteogenic medium (DMEM, 10% FCS, 10-8 M dexamethasone, 50 μg/ml ascorbic acid) in a 60 mm dish. Every 3 days, the medium was changed. After 10 days, the cells were fixed with cold ethanol and alkaline phosphatase (ALP), calcium (Alizarin red), collagen (Sirius red) and methylene blue (total colonies) staining performed. The colony numbers were determined using the program ImageJ.
The cells in 60 mm petri dishes were fixed with cold ethanol for 15 min. They were washed with tap water. Tris (200 mM, pH 8.5) was mixed with naphthol phosphate ASBI (50 μg/ml) and fast red (1 mg/ml) (Fast red was always mixed fresh). 5 ml of the mixture was added to petri dishes. The dishes were shaken for 2 h at room temperature. Afterwards they were washed with tap water and allowed to dry. Photographs of the dishes were taken and colony numbers determined with ImageJ.
Alizarin red staining (Calcium)
Cells were fixed for 15 min with ice-cold ethanol, afterwards washed with tap water. 5 ml of a solution of 1 mg/ml alizarin red in distilled water, pH 5.5 were added. The petri dishes were shaken for 2 h, afterwards washed with tap water and allowed to dry. Images were analyzed for calcium amount using ImageJ.
Sirius red staining (Collagen)
Cells were fixed in ice-cold ethanol for 15 min and washed with tap water. 1 mg/ml sirius red was solved in picric acid. 5 ml of the mixture was added to the cells and the petri dishes shaken for 18 h at room temperature. Then the cells were washed with tap water till red color was completely eluted. The dishes were photographed and analyzed for the amount of collagen (ImageJ).
Methylene blue staining (total colony numbers)
Cells were fixed in ice-cold ethanol for 15 min. They were washed in tap water. 1 mg/ml methylene blue was solved in 10 mM borate buffer, pH 8.8. 5 ml of the mixture was added to the petri dishes and shaken for 30 min. The dishes were washed with tap water until all dye was eluted, photographed and analyzed using ImageJ.
Astrocyte conditioned medium
Astrocyte conditioned medium was produced by incubating medium (DMEM/10% FCS) 24 h with primary astrocyte cultures produced as described by Sievers .
Differentiation towards microglia-like cells
On day 1 (protocol 2) and day 4 (protocol 1), the non-adherent cells were flushed off and transferred to a new dish. Afterwards cells were differentiated for 6 days in 10 ml DMEM/10% FCS, 50% ACM and 20 ng/ml granulocyte-monocyte colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF). Controls were cultured only in DMEM/10% FCS.
Cell were stained for F4/80 (AF488 labelled, eBioscience) (1:250), CD11b/CD45 (AF488 and PE labelled eBioscience) (1:250 and 1:100) and CD34 (PE labelled, Caltag Laboratories) (1:100), CD45 R (RPE labelled, Southern Biotech) (1:100). Cells were trypsinized, centrifuged (300 g for 5 min) and fixed (4% paraformaldehyd). The fixed cells were washed with PBS, incubated for 2 h at 4°C with primary antibody, washed and analysed in a Beckmann Coulter FC 500 Flow cytometer.
3*105 cells were activated with 0.1 μM phorbol myristic acid for 15 min. Then they were incubated in 50 μl DMEM/10% FCS together with 50 μl 1:10 diluted opsonised beads (2.25*107 beads) (Sigma) for 48 h at 37°C, 5% CO2. Cells were trypsinized and resuspended in DPBS (Invitrogen) and fluorescence was measured in a Beckmann Coulter FC 500.
3*105 cells were activated for 15 min with 0.1 μM PMA and controls without PMA. Activated and control cells were incubated with 50 μM DHR123 for additional 15 min. Afterwards the cells were fixed with 4% PFA and fluorescence was measured in a Beckmann Coulter FC 500. Oxidative burst was defined as signal to noise ratio (The ratio of fluorescence of activated to control cells).
Living brain slice cultures
Brains from 2–3 month old C57BL/6 mice were transferred to cold Hank’s buffered salt solution (HBSS)/10% FCS (both Invitrogen). A VT 1000 S vibratome (Leica) was used to cut the brain in 350 μm slices. The slices were culture on a membrane (Millicell CM 0.4 μm, Millipore) at the liquid air interface of medium consisting of 50% DMEM/high glucose (HyClone Laboratories Inc.), 25% horse serum (Invitrogen), 25% HBSS (Invitrogen), 1 μg/ml insulin (Invitrogen), 100units/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin (Invitrogen). The brain slices were cultured for 9 days and the viability of the brain slices was assessed using DAPI/propidium iodide staining. For analysis the slices were scanned using a confocal microscope (TCS SP2, Leica Microsystems).
Invasion of living brain tissue
On day 9 of brain slice culture, differentiated cells were treated with DIO (Invitrogen) for 20 min, washed and seeded on the top of the brain slices. A plastic ring was used to keep the cells from flowing off the slices. Cells and brain tissue were co-cultivated for additional 10 days . After 10 days migration of cells into brain tissue was measured by scanning the slices with a confocal microscope (TCS SP2, Leica Microsystems) to a depth of 160 μm.
Data is presented as means ± SE. SigmaPlot 10.0/SigmaStat 3.5 software (SYSTAT, Erkrath, Germany) was used to perform statistical analysis. For comparison of different groups ANOVA was used.
Cell populations during selective adhesion and differentiation
The numbers of non-adherent cells in culture fell swiftly from day 0 to day 4 of selective adhesion (Figure 1B). From whole bone marrow, after 1 day of selective adhesion 3.5*106 non-adherent cells remained. After 4 days of selective adhesion cell yield was 1.7*106 non-adherent cells.
Marker expression levels
The selection of non-adherent cells by adhesion was combined with differentiation media. Our new cell culture protocol (protocol 1) was compared with the classical approach (protocol 2).
It is difficult to differentiate between macrophages and activated microglia. We used a combination of non-exclusive markers and typical morphology (ramification) as specific signs of microglia (resting macrophages) as suggested by . In addition we used the combination of CD11b/CD45 expression as employed by other groups [22, 23] and the macrophage marker F4/80.
Microglia from cultures of protocol 1 showed the same capacity for an oxidative burst as microglia derived from protocol 2 cultures (Figure 6B). Cytokine supplementation significantly increased oxidative burst in cells derived using protocol 2 - that was present both in supplemented and unsupplemented microglia from protocol 1.
Cells derived from protocol 1 show many small and non-adherent cells and all differentiated cell populations show mixed morphologies as is typical for microglia cultures (Figure 6C-F). Extensive ramification was, however, not visible.
Organotypical brain slices
The cells differentiated with protocol 2 invaded living brain tissue to a depth of up to 80 μm (Figure 6J). Most of the cytokine differentiated cells and the un-supplemented cells migrated into the surface of the slices to a depth of 30 μm.
Cells differentiated from classical derived macrophage showed amoeboid morphology (Figure 6I, J). Cells differentiated from NA-BMCs showed round morphologies (Figure 6G, H). In our qualitative migration experiments cells treated with ACM/GM-CSF or cells derived by protocol 2 migrated deepest (Figure 6J).
Microglia derived from adult material are difficult to obtain. Most studies have been performed on microglia from neonatal sources and cell yields from adult sources are low. In settings where cells would be used clinically, autologous sources are preferable. Bone marrow cells are routinely used for transplantation and contain different stem cell types. We have established here a protocol for the derivation of functional microglia using adult bone marrow providing a source for cell therapy or drug development. It is assumed that in the healthy brain microglia are replenished locally but that under pathological conditions and inflammation bone marrow derived cells can invade the brain and differentiate to microglia .
We used a stem cell cultivation method which was originally developed to expand the undifferentiated stem cell population [3, 25] and tested their use as source for microglia. Repeated selective adhesion, as employed to derive non-adherent bone marrow cells (NA-BMCs), result in a rising capacity of NA-BMCs to form CFU-f. This as well as the high CD34 expression shows that the frequency of stem cells or progenitors increases during time in these cultures. The lymphocyte population in the new suspension cultures (protocol 1) gets diminished by the repeated adhesion and the fraction of immature cells increases. This corresponds to results from other groups showing in rats the increase of CFU-f initiating cells during the repeated re-plating steps . The results for the monocyte lineage were mixed and we can not conclude whether, during the initial culture phase the numbers of progenitors for microglia are diminished or not.
No single marker distinguishes microglia from macrophages. Some publications suggest that CD45 and CD11b together might distinguish between microglia and macrophages . CD45 is a marker for the hematopoietic cells and F4/80 for microglia and macrophages . Our new protocol using non-adherent bone marrow cells showed the same level of differentiation towards microglial cells as protocol 2, based on the classical macrophage differentiation - judged by expression of CD11b+/CD45low and F4/80+, which, together with morphology (ramification), define the microglia population as described by previous studies [22, 23]. Functional microglia derived using the new protocol 1 showed slightly less phagocytosis activity than those of protocol 2, but the burst activity was of the same level.
The lower phagocytosis of cells from protocol 1 might be due to less differentiated and more primitive cells in the supernatant of day 4. It might also be an effect of the longer time in culture before differentiation. That phagocytosis is low in absence of cytokine supplementation is known . Oxidative burst of the differentiated cells is not significantly higher than that of whole bone marrow. Although there are subpopulations in whole bone marrow that do show strong oxidative burst this might point to an immature microglia cell type .
Morphologies were mixed and only few cells showed clearly branches typical for primary resting microglia as one would expect when cells were incubated with astrocyte conditioned medium. The amoeboid and round cell morphology in the co-culture with brain slices indicates an active state in all tested protocols. This might be induced by the apoptotic cells in the slice. It is known that microglia of the brain slices migrate to the surface and phagocytize debris there .
Repeated selective adhesion enriches for stem cells and provides great numbers of microglia, which are functionally active. This protocol provides functional adult microglia which can be used for drug development or cell therapies.
I want to thank for help with confocal microscopy by Prof. Dr. Käs and Undine Dietrich of the Biophysics Group University Leipzig and for help with brain slice cultures by Prof. Dr. Seeger and Gabriele Lindner, Veterinary Anatomy University Leipzig. I thank Moath al Mekhlafi for help with the cell phenotyping.
- Streit WJ: Microglial senescence: does the brain's immune system have an expiration date?. Trends Neurosci. 2006, 29: 506-510. 10.1016/j.tins.2006.07.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sievers J, Parwaresch R, Wottge HU: Blood monocytes and spleen macrophages differentiate into microglia-like cells on monolayers of astrocytes: morphology. Glia. 1994, 12: 245-258. 10.1002/glia.440120402.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang ZL, Tong J, Lu RN, Scutt AM, Goltzman D, Miao DS: Therapeutic potential of non-adherent BM-derived mesenchymal stem cells in tissue regeneration. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2009, 43: 69-81. 10.1038/bmt.2008.260.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fricke S, Fricke C, Oelkrug C, Hilger N, Schonfelder U, Kamprad M, Lehmann J, Boltze J, Emmrich F, Sack U: Characterization of murine non-adherent bone marrow cells leading to recovery of endogenous hematopoiesis. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2010, 67: 4095-4106. 10.1007/s00018-010-0427-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kuznetsov SA, Mankani MH, Gronthos S, Satomura K, Bianco P, Robey PG: Circulating skeletal stem cells. J Cell Biol. 2001, 153: 1133-1140. 10.1083/jcb.153.5.1133.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Leone C, Le Pavec G, Meme W, Porcheray F, Samah B, Dormont D, Gras G: Characterization of human monocyte-derived microglia-like cells. Glia. 2006, 54: 183-192. 10.1002/glia.20372.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kassis I, Zangi L, Rivkin R, Levdansky L, Samuel S, Marx G, Gorodetsky R: Isolation of mesenchymal stem cells from G-CSF-mobilized human peripheral blood using fibrin microbeads. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2006, 37: 967-976. 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705358.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Takahashi T, Kalka C, Masuda H, Chen D, Silver M, Kearney M, Magner M, Isner JM, Asahara T: Ischemia- and cytokine-induced mobilization of bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells for neovascularization. Nat Med. 1999, 5: 434-438. 10.1038/7434.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rochefort GY, Delorme B, Lopez A, Herault O, Bonnet P, Charbord P, Eder V, Domenech J: Multipotential mesenchymal stem cells are mobilized into peripheral blood by hypoxia. Stem Cells. 2006, 24: 2202-2208. 10.1634/stemcells.2006-0164.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mansilla E, Marin GH, Drago H, Sturla F, Salas E, Gardiner C, Bossi S, Lamonega R, Guzman A, Nunez A, et al: Bloodstream cells phenotypically identical to human mesenchymal bone marrow stem cells circulate in large amounts under the influence of acute large skin damage: new evidence for their use in regenerative medicine. Transplant Proc. 2006, 38: 967-969. 10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.02.053.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Djouad F, Plence P, Bony C, Tropel P, Apparailly F, Sany J, Noel D, Jorgensen C: Immunosuppressive effect of mesenchymal stem cells favors tumor growth in allogeneic animals. Blood. 2003, 102: 3837-3844. 10.1182/blood-2003-04-1193.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stagg J: Immune regulation by mesenchymal stem cells: two sides to the coin. Tissue Antigens. 2007, 69: 1-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim J, Hematti P: Mesenchymal stem cell-educated macrophages: a novel type of alternatively activated macrophages. Exp Hematol. 2009, 37: 1445-1453. 10.1016/j.exphem.2009.09.004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Maggini J, Mirkin G, Bognanni I, Holmberg J, Piazzon IM, Nepomnaschy I, Costa H, Canones C, Raiden S, Vermeulen M, Geffner JR: Mouse bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells turn activated macrophages into a regulatory-like profile. PLoS One. 2010, 5: e9252-10.1371/journal.pone.0009252.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee JK, Jin HK, Bae JS: Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells reduce brain amyloid-beta deposition and accelerate the activation of microglia in an acutely induced Alzheimer's disease mouse model. Neurosci Lett. 2009, 450: 136-141. 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.11.059.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bae JS, Furuya S, Ahn SJ, Yi SJ, Hirabayashi Y, Jin HK: Neuroglial activation in Niemann-Pick Type C mice is suppressed by intracerebral transplantation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Neurosci Lett. 2005, 381: 234-236. 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.02.029.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bae JS, Han HS, Youn DH, Carter JE, Modo M, Schuchman EH, Jin HK: Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells promote neuronal networks with functional synaptic transmission after transplantation into mice with neurodegeneration. Stem Cells. 2007, 25: 1307-1316. 10.1634/stemcells.2006-0561.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ooi YY, Ramasamy R, Rahmat Z, Subramaiam H, Tan SW, Abdullah M, Israf DA, Vidyadaran S: Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells modulate BV2 microglia responses to lipopolysaccharide. Int Immunopharmacol. 2010, 10: 1532-1540. 10.1016/j.intimp.2010.09.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhou C, Zhang C, Chi S, Xu Y, Teng J, Wang H, Song Y, Zhao R: Effects of human marrow stromal cells on activation of microglial cells and production of inflammatory factors induced by lipopolysaccharide. Brain Res. 2009, 1269: 23-30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stoppini L, Buchs PA, Muller D: A simple method for organotypic cultures of nervous tissue. J Neurosci Methods. 1991, 37: 173-182. 10.1016/0165-0270(91)90128-M.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Salzman GC, Crowell JM, Martin JC, Trujillo TT, Romero A, Mullaney PF, LaBauve PM: Cell classification by laser light scattering: identification and separation of unstained leukocytes. Acta Cytol. 1975, 19: 374-377.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Servet-Delprat C, Arnaud S, Jurdic P, Nataf S, Grasset MF, Soulas C, Domenget C, Destaing O, Rivollier A, Perret M, et al: Flt3+ macrophage precursors commit sequentially to osteoclasts, dendritic cells and microglia. BMC Immunol. 2002, 3: 15-10.1186/1471-2172-3-15.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ford AL, Goodsall AL, Hickey WF, Sedgwick JD: Normal adult ramified microglia separated from other central nervous system macrophages by flow cytometric sorting. Phenotypic differences defined and direct ex vivo antigen presentation to myelin basic protein-reactive CD4+ T cells compared. J Immunol. 1995, 154: 4309-4321.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Simard AR, Rivest S: Neuroprotective effects of resident microglia following acute brain injury. J Comp Neurol. 2007, 504: 716-729. 10.1002/cne.21469.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fricke S, Ackermann M, Stolzing A, Schimmelpfennig C, Hilger N, Jahns J, Hildebrandt G, Emmrich F, Ruschpler P, Posel C, et al: Allogeneic non-adherent bone marrow cells facilitate hematopoietic recovery but do not lead to allogeneic engraftment. PLoS One. 2009, 4: e6157-10.1371/journal.pone.0006157.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stoll G, Jander S: The role of microglia and macrophages in the pathophysiology of the CNS. Prog Neurobiol. 1999, 58: 233-247. 10.1016/S0301-0082(98)00083-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Austyn JM, Gordon S: F4/80, a monoclonal antibody directed specifically against the mouse macrophage. Eur J Immunol. 1981, 11: 805-815. 10.1002/eji.1830111013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Naito M: Macrophage heterogeneity in development and differentiation. Arch Histol Cytol. 1993, 56: 331-351. 10.1679/aohc.56.331.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Santambrogio L, Belyanskaya SL, Fischer FR, Cipriani B, Brosnan CF, Ricciardi-Castagnoli P, Stern LJ, Strominger JL, Riese R: Developmental plasticity of CNS microglia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001, 98: 6295-6300. 10.1073/pnas.111152498.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Heppner FL, Skutella T, Hailer NP, Haas D, Nitsch R: Activated microglial cells migrate towards sites of excitotoxic neuronal injury inside organotypic hippocampal slice cultures. Eur J Neurosci. 1998, 10: 3284-3290. 10.1046/j.1460-9568.1998.00379.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.